As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$45.00
13 hrs ago
Nobody 2 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.95
9 hrs ago
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
1 day ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Weapons (Blu-ray)
$22.95
1 day ago
Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.99
21 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
I Love Lucy: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$47.49
8 hrs ago
Elio (Blu-ray)
$24.89
19 hrs ago
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$101.99
 
Longlegs 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.60
1 day ago
Aeon Flux 4K (Blu-ray)
$26.59
13 hrs ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2012, 02:07 PM   #3981
iamsometal iamsometal is offline
Expert Member
 
iamsometal's Avatar
 
Oct 2009
Charlotte, NC
161
626
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thephantomcat View Post
They aren't a "high priced label". $30 dollars is actually lower than allot of new releases MSRP. It's not TT fault we're all used to picking up movies at Walmarts Bargain Bin.
$30 for a bare-bones release is most definitely high priced, regardless of how many units are pressed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:12 PM   #3982
prozacnation1978 prozacnation1978 is offline
Banned
 
Oct 2010
san diego california
Default

Saw it last night. Wasn't as bad as I thought it would be
But for 35 bucks. Safe to say I won't get another twilight time release

If they do a recall. I will probably send it back. If not I am cool with it

The movie wasn't as good as I saw it last
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:14 PM   #3983
Tybo28 Tybo28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Tybo28's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
Williamsport, Pennsylvania
45
1175
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thephantomcat View Post
They aren't a "high priced label". $30 dollars is actually lower than allot of new releases MSRP. It's not TT fault we're all used to picking up movies at Walmarts Bargain Bin.
Uh, $30 for a featureless blu ray is pretty expensive. Don't know where you're shopping? Ive never paid msrp in my life. Id think the majority of people who would buy movies that expensive would be...fans. the same people upset about this release. What exactly have we established here? TT is a company that charges top dollar, has no involvement in their releases or interest in the films they release, does no research, accepts whatever the studio gives them, but questions their customers? I can't believe the mega store hasn't opened yet... Personally, unlike this blu ray, I think they're showing their true colors. Don't have much else to say about the subject. We'll have to agree to disagree.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:15 PM   #3984
thephantomcat thephantomcat is offline
Expert Member
 
thephantomcat's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
445
302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamsometal View Post
$30 for a bare-bones release is most definitely high priced, regardless of how many units are pressed.
You see, this is why people come off as whiners. You undestand that Units Sold x Price - Cost = Profit, right? So the number of units pressed is VERY important when it comes to detirmining cost.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:18 PM   #3985
MifuneFan MifuneFan is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
MifuneFan's Avatar
 
Mar 2012
New York City
27
1143
69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thephantomcat View Post
You see, this is why people come off as whiners. You undestand that Units Sold x Price - Cost = Profit, right? So the number of units pressed is VERY important when it comes to detirmining cost.
You might want to take a little break there. You're getting a little too defensive over a company you don't even work for.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:19 PM   #3986
UNCMT9 UNCMT9 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
UNCMT9's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Knoxville, TN
191
3
Default

Have you guys solved the world's problems yet?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:20 PM   #3987
metropolis metropolis is offline
Member
 
Oct 2009
4
Default

Seems Twilight Time have a few plants in this thread. They know no logic other than defend at all costs!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:22 PM   #3988
UNCMT9 UNCMT9 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
UNCMT9's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Knoxville, TN
191
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by metropolis View Post
Seems Twilight Time have a few plants in this thread. They know no logic other than defend at all costs!!
To be fair, what if it's Sony's fault? This isn't a witchhunt. People are so anxious to blame someone, they won't even wait until the truth is known.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:24 PM   #3989
metropolis metropolis is offline
Member
 
Oct 2009
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNCMT9 View Post
To be fair, what if it's Sony's fault? This isn't a witchhunt. People are so anxious to blame someone, they won't even wait until the truth is known.
Pretty clear that BOTH are responsible for the product, don't you think?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:24 PM   #3990
Tybo28 Tybo28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Tybo28's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
Williamsport, Pennsylvania
45
1175
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by metropolis View Post
Pretty clear that BOTH are responsible for the product, don't you think?
Yes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:25 PM   #3991
iamsometal iamsometal is offline
Expert Member
 
iamsometal's Avatar
 
Oct 2009
Charlotte, NC
161
626
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thephantomcat View Post
You see, this is why people come off as whiners. You undestand that Units Sold x Price - Cost = Profit, right? So the number of units pressed is VERY important when it comes to detirmining cost.
You're turning this into a completely different argument. We're not talking about cost of manufacturing and TT's profit. We're talking about the price they're charging collectors for a bare-bones release. The fact is, TT charges a premium for a collectible disc. End of story.

By chance do you work for TT, or are friends with someone that does? Just wondering.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:25 PM   #3992
UNCMT9 UNCMT9 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
UNCMT9's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Knoxville, TN
191
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by metropolis View Post
Pretty clear that BOTH are responsible for the product, don't you think?
Probably. Who knows. Only time will tell.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:28 PM   #3993
thephantomcat thephantomcat is offline
Expert Member
 
thephantomcat's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
445
302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MifuneFan View Post
You might want to take a little break there. You're getting a little too defensive over a company you don't even work for.
Oh, I'm the one that needs to take a break? There are people who've been on here complaining about the same exact thing non-stop for 24 hours even though they've already been told that Sony is being contacted as soon as possible and an answer will be forth coming, but I'm the one who needs to take a break? And from what? I'd say the people throwing around words like butt kisser and plants are the one's who need to calm down. Cause if someone has an opinion different than their's, they are disingeniolus.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:30 PM   #3994
psicon psicon is offline
Expert Member
 
Jun 2009
1389
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thephantomcat View Post
You see, this is why people come off as whiners. You undestand that Units Sold x Price - Cost = Profit, right? So the number of units pressed is VERY important when it comes to detirmining cost.
Ah, finally I understand why Troma had such an astronomically high list price of $29.99 for their limited 1 blu, 2 DVD, 1 CD release of Father's Day. Sure they had 2000 extra to make a profit on, but that super expensive individual numbering must have eaten into that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:30 PM   #3995
Ill_Be_Back Ill_Be_Back is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Ill_Be_Back's Avatar
 
Mar 2012
Northern Ireland
35
Default

I can't believe how many pages have spawned since I have been away about 30 pages have been added since last night...
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:32 PM   #3996
Cortiz Cortiz is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Cortiz's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Out there, past them trees
489
Default

I have an idea....why don't we stop making assumptions and wait until there's ACTUALLY AN OFFICIAL WORD?

Last edited by Cortiz; 10-01-2012 at 02:36 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:33 PM   #3997
UNCMT9 UNCMT9 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
UNCMT9's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Knoxville, TN
191
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cortiz View Post
I have an idea....what don't we stop making assumptions and wait until there's ACTUALLY AN OFFICIAL WORD?
That means that all those placing blame on someone would actually have to eat crow.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:35 PM   #3998
AgentOrange AgentOrange is online now
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Jul 2011
382
2619
69
3
10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNCMT9 View Post
Probably. Who knows. Only time will tell.
The point is even if it is Sony's fault, that is not really an excuse for Twilight Time to not fix it. I don't think people care who's 'fault' it is, if there's a problem they just want it corrected to the way the film should appear. It's irrelevant whether it was introduced in the "telecine process" or during the authoring/duplication of the discs. Unless it was a change absolutely approved by the director/cinematographer, which is hard to believe at this point, then it needs to be corrected.

Sony and Twilight Time can fight with each internally as far as recouping their contract costs (i.e. if it's Sony's mistake they should cover some of Twilight Time's lost expenses), but at the end of the day it's up to Twilight Time to please it's customers who are essentially "special ordering" items from the directly. Even understanding they are a small operation, it's too bad. They don't get to just retain the profits off a faulty disc and do nothing about it. They still have an obligation to "make things right" with their product.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:36 PM   #3999
MifuneFan MifuneFan is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
MifuneFan's Avatar
 
Mar 2012
New York City
27
1143
69
Default

I found this apologist review quite amusing
Quote:
Night Of The Living Dead - Twilight Time Blu Ray Review!

Night Of The Living Dead (1990) sure does bring back a lot of memories for me. It was this very film that firmly implanted my love of horror. This was also the first film that I was allowed to stay up past my 8PM bedtime to see. (Awwww) This mark on the timeline of my life, turned me into the horror-loving night-owl that I am today.

When I learned that ‘Twilight Time’ were planning a limited Blu Ray release of this film, I knew I HAD to own it! Being the proud owner of two other TT titles, I knew they would use an amazing print, as they have a reputation for obtaining the best available prints for their releases. I’m proud to say that they did just that....kinda. The print is amazing, with its clean picture and beautiful film grain. HOWEVER, If you compare it to the 1999 DVD print, you will notice that there are some differences. Yes, the Print used for the Blu Ray release is cleaner than that used for the DVD. You no longer see all the dirt, and film-gunk. But the print is also significantly darker, and the color is all wrong. This really isn’t a huge deal for me. I mean I'm not going to lose sleep over it. But it would have been nice had the color been corrected to the way it was presented on the DVD.
I’ve included two comparison stills below, as well as some other BR stills that give you an idea of the quality of the BR.

n conclusion, I am glad that I get to add the Blu Ray of this film to my collection. Even with the darker picture and oh-so-wrong color. It is absolutely one of my favorite films. A "Thank You" goes out to the people at Twilight Time / Screen Archives Entertainment for giving us this film in Blu Ray format. They may not have gotten it right this time, but they DID try. I know a lot of people are angry about this release, and it's completely understandable. Hopefully this will be a lesson-learned for T.T. I don't know if anything will be done to correct this issue, but hopefully the future titles that are to be released will not disappoint as this one apparently has.
Thanks Twilight Time, next time for sure you'll get it right!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 02:36 PM   #4000
thephantomcat thephantomcat is offline
Expert Member
 
thephantomcat's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
445
302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamsometal View Post
You're turning this into a completely different argument. We're not talking about cost of manufacturing and TT's profit. We're talking about the price they're charging collectors for a bare-bones release. The fact is, TT charges a premium for a collectible disc. End of story.

By chance do you work for TT, or are friends with someone that does? Just wondering.
No. Oh, my God....

And it doesn't matter if it comes with no special features or 20 hours of special features. They have to keep the lights on and that what detirmines the price. Special features are extras and were first intended to attract consumers to make the switch to a new format. Why do you think they are removing special features from DVDs and only including them on the Blu-rays? To entice people to switch. Twilight Time isn't trying to convert anyone. Besides, you were the one that brought up the issue of price.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 AM.