|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $82.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $22.95 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.59 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $41.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $20.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $101.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $7.00 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.96 8 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1721 |
Member
Dec 2007
St. Paul, MN
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1722 |
Special Member
|
![]()
"There you go, Penton-Man is still busy working.
Quote: Originally Posted by Penton-Man View Post Hey guys, I’ve told you time and again don’t call me at work. One lady[Weinstein or Universal] wants highlights and another new customer[Universal or Weinstein] just walked in and wants a color change. I’m busy! Take advantage of kjack and talkstr8t while they’re here. Later." I think in regards to this, Universal would be the highlights to go neutral, Weinstein would be the color change since they were red exclusive and would flip outright to Blu exclusive. |
![]() |
#1724 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Now, for a question to all insiders, esp. Maxpower since he seems to be the most accessible: I've read rumors that Paramounts exclusive contract is pretty iron-clad, so will they just have to wait it out? For whatever you know, how will contractual obligations affect the HD DVD-exclusive studios from moving to a better laser aperture in a more timely fashion? Thank you for all the work tonight. |
|
![]() |
#1725 | |
Member
|
![]()
Does anyone care to comment on this latest revelation...
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#1726 |
Senior Member
Sep 2007
|
![]()
Funny because I thought I saw a link where they were covered by it.
|
![]() |
#1727 | |
Senior Member
Jul 2007
|
![]() Quote:
--- so i'm half way through my Chimay Red in celebration. god bless those trappist monks. |
|
![]() |
#1729 |
Special Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1731 |
Senior Member
Sep 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1732 |
Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1733 |
Member
Jan 2008
Spring, Texas
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1734 |
Senior Member
Jul 2007
|
![]()
man that's just wrong
![]() +1 on all the thanks to the insiders. i've learned quite a lot and don't think i've ever religiously checked a site as much as this over the last few months. this site and the insiders are why i have a ps3 and blu-ray movies. and why i've been able to sell several other folks on blu (no kidding! i want commission ![]() |
![]() |
#1735 |
Active Member
Nov 2006
|
![]()
Shocked, but extremely glad about Warner seeing the light
![]() And what impeccable timing! There sure is going to be a lot of free seats at the two hour HD DVD event. I feel sorry for the HD DVD presenters who will have to stand there looking silly. If the timing wasn't a deliberate measure to ensure maximum effect against HD DVD, I'd be surprised. Warner is truly blu. Million thanks to Penton-man, paidgeek, kjack, maxpower, drmpeg, talk, RBFilms and all the other insiders for your valiant efforts, and effectiveness. In the end, I'm relieved that a format is winning because of its fundamental merits. And not because of meaningless points such as earliness, or disc yields. Not because of negative campaigning. Not because of lies. |
![]() |
#1737 |
Senior Member
Jul 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1738 |
Active Member
Oct 2006
Wisconsin
|
![]()
Some smart guy on KlipschCorner.com had this to say. Hey insiders, maybe you can help promote an obviously Blu-Ray biased site...
"Nearly a year ago, on my personal blog, I wrote that I thought Blu-Ray was looking good. As a perfection-seeking home theater enthusiast, the future of packaged High Defintion media is something that I felt concerned me and the industry closely. I wrote that Blu-Ray was better technology because more storage space + higher maximum bitrates for audio+video ultimately meant a better home theater experience. I also wrote that I felt Blu-Ray actually had a chance to win in the marketplace and I spelled out why. Today, Warner announced that they would be dropping HD-DVD support to be Blu-Ray exclusive. As one of the most successful studios in current day terms, with some of the most successful catalog titles from the past ten years, this is a pretty big blow to HD-DVD. Looking back at sales numbers, all of the highest selling HD-DVD titles have come from Warner with the notable exception of Transformers. The Matrix, Batman Begins, 300, Harry Potter, V for Vendetta; these have been the big sellers and they are Warner titles. Warner owns New Line who will surely follow suit and have said as much in the past. This means that the LOTR movies will be Blu-Ray exclusive. Some Blu-Ray fanboys have claimed that this is essentially the end of the format war. As a fellow BD Fanboy I am inclined to agree. Some HD-DVD fanboys have said that HD packaged media will just be a small niche product and suffer the fate of DVD-Audio vs. SACD. I am inclined to disagree. Some extremely rabid fanboys have said they are now going back to upconverted DVDs or waiting for HD downloads, refusing to join their hated Blu enemy. This last position is hardest to understand on a number of levels. Ten years ago, if you had told me the unwashed masses would be siding with Microsoft and calling Sony the big bad company they couldn't support on priciple, I would have laughed in your face. I half expect Apple to be the next "big bad out of fashion ugly corporate face" next. Anyway, to get the kind of audio and video quality of say, Pirates of the Carribean on Blu-Ray today, it would take most people 3-5 days to finish the download. I really think we are several years out before even the most cutting edge households have this kind of bandwidth, let alone average movie watching folks. I personally own several movies on DVD and Blu-Ray. Doing back-to-back comparisons of upconverted Pirates of the Carribean, Black Hawk Down, Bram Stoker's Dracula, against their native 1080p counterparts, I cannot fathom anyone choosing upconverted DVD over true high definition source material. It should be noted that while color gradients and resolution can be extrapolated to produce an image that is better than the data on disc, I know of no sound upconversion. Sound is half of the movie experience. This notion of never getting into Blu-Ray due purely to Sour Grapes seems both immature and telling. Had Warner gone the other way, I would have been stopping by Best Buy on the way home to see if the high end 1080p Toshiba HD-DVD players were in stock, and I would have picked up some Universal published guilty pleasures (Pitch Black, Chronicles of Riddick) to go with it. Sure, I would have been upset that my analysis was incorrect, but I like high definition audio and sound, so I would have to go with the best format with the best chance of succeeding in the marketplace. I have a feeling Warner's decision will cause the entire High Definition Packaged Media pie to grow in size. Will Blu-Ray succeed DVD? I don't know, I hope so. Either way I'll be enjoying 1080p video and uncompressed LPCM audio for some time to come, and if you pick up a Blu-Ray player so can you. " |
![]() |
#1739 | |
Active Member
Oct 2006
|
![]() Quote:
Welcome! |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Archived: Insiders Thread | Insider Discussion | Deciazulado | 7061 | 12-16-2007 05:22 PM |
|
|