As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.00
3 hrs ago
Dogtooth 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
8 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Creepshow: Complete Series - Seasons 1-4 (Blu-ray)
$68.47
1 day ago
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
Danza Macabra: Volume Four — The Italian Gothic Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$108.99
4 hrs ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$86.13
 
I Know What You Did Last Summer 4K (Blu-ray)
$39.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2007, 03:19 AM   #5521
PrinceLH PrinceLH is offline
Senior Member
 
PrinceLH's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Wink

Quote:
If CE companies can't turn a profit, they won't make a player... this is straight out of Econ-101. And without CE support, the BDA would be just like Toshiba, which is like a man with both impotence and "performance issues"... no matter how much viagra ($) microsoft gives toshiba to prop them up, they still climaxed too soon, and are already rolling over to go to sleep, while blu ray is building a base for better long term performance and market penitration without being artificially propped up.


That last paragraph is nothing short of brilliant. Well done!
While I like to agree with most of this post, I also think that it would be a good time to start moving out the profile 1.0 players for under $300.00. I would love to buy a new 1.1 or 2.0 player and either sell or give my profile 1.0 to a relative and keep the Blu momentum going forward.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 03:33 AM   #5522
blu2 blu2 is offline
Special Member
 
Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman_II View Post
If CE companies can't turn a profit, they won't make a player... this is straight out of Econ-101. And without CE support, the BDA would be just like Toshiba, which is like a man with both impotence and "performance issues"... no matter how much viagra ($) microsoft gives toshiba to prop them up, they still climaxed too soon, and are already rolling over to go to sleep, while blu ray is building a base for better long term performance and market penitration without being artificially propped up.
Obviously we have two very different market penetration strategies at work here. Toshiba's desperate strategy is intended to prime their market for "razor blades" (e.g. their future royaltees) and not "razors". They have no real interest in other CE vendors - it's their baby.

Blu Ray vendors, since many of them gain nothing from royalties, want to make a healthy profit on the hardware side.

It doesn't matter how desperate the HD DVD strategy is however, or whether Sony or some other Blu Ray vendor adopting a similar strategy would screw the other Blu Ray CE vendors. The question is whether Toshiba will successfully flood the market with cheap players and shift media sales.

Honestly we all hope Toshiba's strategy will be impotent, but really it is hard to know what is going to happen over the next six weeks.

There's nothing any of us can do at this point but keep supporting the format and have confidence that the BDA companies will take steps to maintain or grow market share.

If BDA succeeds and ultimately shift the scales definitively that's great.

Worst case, we can probably expect reasonably priced dual format players in a year or so.

Last edited by blu2; 11-19-2007 at 03:38 AM.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 04:07 AM   #5523
T-Wrecks T-Wrecks is offline
Active Member
 
T-Wrecks's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Default I prefer the term "saturation"...

The real question is: "What sales percentage will it take and how long must it be sustained before a neutral studio decides its time to go all in for Blu-ray and cause a siesmic shift that is needed to hasten an end to this war?"

Is it 70/30 for 3 solid months? Is it total sales volume large enough to provide a sample that validates/is convincing statistical information? If so, then what volume must be hit?

We are definitely being blu-wooed as if we are "so very close" to victory by the neutral parties, but I believe this is just another tactic to garner sales until I see the proof.

Thoughts?
 
Old 11-19-2007, 04:13 AM   #5524
Joe Cain Joe Cain is offline
Power Member
 
Joe Cain's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
The Tragic City
79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Wrecks View Post
The real question is: "What sales percentage will it take and how long must it be sustained before a neutral studio decides its time to go all in for Blu-ray and cause a siesmic shift that is needed to hasten an end to this war?"

Is it 70/30 for 3 solid months? Is it total sales volume large enough to provide a sample that validates/is convincing statistical information? If so, then what volume must be hit?

We are definitely being blu-wooed as if we are "so very close" to victory by the neutral parties, but I believe this is just another tactic to garner sales until I see the proof.

Thoughts?
No idea what the actual numbers are, but that sounds right. There have been some posts on the Insiders thread which suggest many parties are waiting for certain milestones to be hit---total units sold, a certain sales ratio advantage over time, and so on. What those targets are and what the hard numbers are is impossible to say, but if the industry wants HDM to succeed I think everyone involved is aware a dual format market won't play in prime time. BD is much closer to hitting any of those targets by virtue of its success to date: if this were the Tour de France, BD has yet to surrender the yellow jersey.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 05:19 AM   #5525
OokieSpookie OokieSpookie is offline
Banned
 
Nov 2007
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Wrecks View Post
The real question is: "What sales percentage will it take and how long must it be sustained before a neutral studio decides its time to go all in for Blu-ray and cause a siesmic shift that is needed to hasten an end to this war?"

Is it 70/30 for 3 solid months? Is it total sales volume large enough to provide a sample that validates/is convincing statistical information? If so, then what volume must be hit?

We are definitely being blu-wooed as if we are "so very close" to victory by the neutral parties, but I believe this is just another tactic to garner sales until I see the proof.

Thoughts?
I don't think it is a matter of being steady.
I would think that they want to see a steady increase.
If you are selling somewhere between 100k-200k possible players a month plus stand alones it is only natural for them to expect numbers grow week to week and month to month.
Winning week after week is nice and is part of the equation but only part.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 05:42 AM   #5526
Iceman_II Iceman_II is offline
Expert Member
 
Jan 2007
Ft. Worth
2
308
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OokieSpookie View Post
I don't think it is a matter of being steady.
I would think that they want to see a steady increase.
If you are selling somewhere between 100k-200k possible players a month plus stand alones it is only natural for them to expect numbers grow week to week and month to month.
Winning week after week is nice and is part of the equation but only part.
I disagree a bit... you know what they say, figures lie, and liars figure... You can spin the numbers into anything you want, but if you look at them in a vacuum, as total numbers sold increase, the rate of growth in multiples may only need to be constant, but it MUST be higher, much higher in raw numbers to sustain the 2:1 margin, and trust me, the numbers guys in Hollywood know this. The studios are looking for a consistant, year over year steadily increasing income stream. I believe consistancy shows them that, not spikes in sales due to weekly aperitions due to what ever flavor of the month is released. The fact that more people would rather buy blu catalog titles than would rather purchase red catalog titles AND their biggest blockbuster of the year makes the HD-DVD format almost laughable.

(yes, BOTH blu and red had BOGOs that week, so any redbois that are reading this, don't even try to whine about it)
 
Old 11-19-2007, 11:46 AM   #5527
Terjyn Terjyn is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Jul 2007
122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OokieSpookie View Post
I don't think it is a matter of being steady.
I would think that they want to see a steady increase.
If you are selling somewhere between 100k-200k possible players a month plus stand alones it is only natural for them to expect numbers grow week to week and month to month.
Winning week after week is nice and is part of the equation but only part.
There is a steady increase. As the market grows it takes a bigger increase to maintain the same ratio.

This is why the claim that Blu-Ray is "only" keeping a 2:1 ratio is fairly laughable.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 01:25 PM   #5528
UTVOL06 UTVOL06 is offline
Expert Member
 
UTVOL06's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Georgia
7
245
480
83
Default

Quote:
Mendelssohn: A Midsummer Night's Dream (Opus Arte)
Star Trek: The Original Series -- The Complete First Season (Paramount)
Tremors (Universal)
Those are the HD-DVD Releases for the 20th...I think Blu-ray is gonna kill HD with its Die Hard series release.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 01:30 PM   #5529
DealsR4theDevil DealsR4theDevil is offline
Power Member
 
Sep 2007
76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTVOL06 View Post
Those are the HD-DVD Releases for the 20th...I think Blu-ray is gonna kill HD with its Die Hard series release.
Trek fans, and we all know they are crazy about Star Trek, will be getting the season 1 HD DVD because it is a combo DVD/HD DVD and there is no DVD version coming out. Fortunately for us, there are not enough of these people to change the numbers drastically.

What Toshiba should do is not release any Universal or Paramount movies on DVD only on HD DVD/DVD combo discs. That way people would be buying HD DVDs all the time and it would be more about getting an HD DVD player for $99 after their collection built up enough. Honestly I do not know why they would not do this.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 01:44 PM   #5530
BluOgre BluOgre is offline
Senior Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DealsR4theDevil View Post

What Toshiba should do is not release any Universal or Paramount movies on DVD only on HD DVD/DVD combo discs. That way people would be buying HD DVDs all the time and it would be more about getting an HD DVD player for $99 after their collection built up enough. Honestly I do not know why they would not do this.
lol, ok Paramount might be a ***** but they are not a stupid *****. That would be financial suicide for a stuido to do that specially when their intrest in this war stop and ends with that $150 million check. There is no way they would kill their DVD sales (and yes, this would cost them millions upon millions) to boost a format that essentially small potatoes right now. They don't get the royalties so there is no reason to do this.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 01:49 PM   #5531
CptGreedle CptGreedle is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
CptGreedle's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Sworn super-hero now services Atlanta (and suburbs).
128
5
Send a message via AIM to CptGreedle
Default

Paramount only got $50 million, Dreamworks got $100 million.
If Dreamworks changes to a new studio, who knows what will happen.
But right now we should not worry about it.

Paramount made a financially secure decision, at least for instant gratification. I am sure sometime next year they will see how staying neutral would have benefitted them more. But the CEOs are weak greedy people, and obviously have made bad choices before.

We will just have to wait and see what happens.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 11:51 PM   #5532
ryoohki ryoohki is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
ryoohki's Avatar
 
May 2007
6
6
8
5
Default

Prepared for screwed up numbers in 2 weeks, there's no version of the Remastered Star Trek TOS on DVD, just the HD DVD Combo, and knowing Star Trek Fan, it will indeed do influence this.

remember there's like MILLIONS of DVD Player owner in NA...
 
Old 11-20-2007, 12:03 AM   #5533
user friendly user friendly is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
The Great White North
7
87
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CptGreedle View Post
Paramount made a financially secure decision, at least for instant gratification. I am sure sometime next year they will see how staying neutral would have benefitted them more. But the CEOs are weak greedy people, and obviously have made bad choices before.
There's no way that staying neutral would have benefited them more, it's the main reason they didn't stay neutral. Do you realize how many movies they would have to make in the time frame of 18 months, to make $150m?

This was an amazing deal for Dreamworks/Paramount and it was only for 18 months. They shafted the BD fans but it's not that important too them at this point. Basically, they're waiting for the contract to end so they can get back in the HDM race. First movie to come, I can almost see it now, Transformers on BD.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 12:05 AM   #5534
atomik kinder atomik kinder is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Jun 2007
Omaha NE
-
-
-
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryoohki View Post
Prepared for screwed up numbers in 2 weeks, there's no version of the Remastered Star Trek TOS on DVD, just the HD DVD Combo, and knowing Star Trek Fan, it will indeed do influence this.

remember there's like MILLIONS of DVD Player owner in NA...
I highly doubt that. It isn't even selling well on Amazon where people tend to buy box sets and double disc sets over the standard issue dvds. All the Trek fans already have their original UNTOUCHED sets. They don't want something that has been messed around with. It ain't gonna happen.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 02:28 AM   #5535
gear gear is offline
Active Member
 
gear's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atomik kinder View Post
I highly doubt that. It isn't even selling well on Amazon where people tend to buy box sets and double disc sets over the standard issue dvds. All the Trek fans already have their original UNTOUCHED sets. They don't want something that has been messed around with. It ain't gonna happen.
I agree this set was already been introduced back at the end of 2004. Sure they cleaned it up, but how many people will pay $125 for something they already own and see on TV every week in reruns.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 02:29 AM   #5536
sj001 sj001 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
sj001's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Rochester, NY
317
17
5
Default

Speaking of Neilsen numbers... does anyone know if they will be released this Friday due to Thanksgiving and all?
 
Old 11-20-2007, 04:35 AM   #5537
OokieSpookie OokieSpookie is offline
Banned
 
Nov 2007
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gear View Post
I agree this set was already been introduced back at the end of 2004. Sure they cleaned it up, but how many people will pay $125 for something they already own and see on TV every week in reruns.
You do realize that this is the remastered versions where they fixed and added effects and all of that right?
As far as I am aware they have never been released yet other than showing once a week at like 11pm on some back woods tv stations.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 04:59 AM   #5538
UltimateFighter UltimateFighter is offline
Active Member
 
UltimateFighter's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Snohomish, WA
1
11
Default Could BD lose the Nov 27 week in sales?

Is anybody else worried about this?

We've got:

I Know Who Killed Me
Jin-Roh: The Wolf Brigade
The Omega Man
Paprika

VS. the following from HD-DVD

Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy
Hot Rod
Mr. Bean's Holiday
Old School
The Omega Man

I'm actually worried about this I hope we have some more BOGO's to dish out or a ton of residual sales.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 05:03 AM   #5539
dakota81 dakota81 is offline
Expert Member
 
Apr 2007
Default

No one can buy any other movie than that list next week? And are you suggesting the BDA actually needs to give away free movies just for the satisfaction? Why are you worried?
 
Old 11-20-2007, 05:10 AM   #5540
UltimateFighter UltimateFighter is offline
Active Member
 
UltimateFighter's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Snohomish, WA
1
11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dakota81 View Post
No one can buy any other movie than that list next week?
Of course they can. That's why I was hoping for a large amount of residual sales!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dakota81 View Post
Why are you worried?
Because new releases tend to be the main driver of sales for their respective week. Our new release lineup sucks for that week and it worries me that our sales leverage over HD-DVD for that week may slip. Nothing that would affect the SI or YTD#'s but a weekly win for HD-DVD in the holiday season is not something I want them to be able to claim.
 
Closed Thread
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
100:0 ? Nielsen/VideoScan Weekly (Post-War) Sales Numbers Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology marzetta7 670 05-23-2008 05:49 PM
Can someone create a Nielsen/Videoscan thread that no one can post on? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Blu4ever 2 11-16-2007 08:25 PM
Nielsen/VideoScan Numbers sticky? Feedback Forum Helicon 2 05-14-2007 09:17 PM
Nielsen VideoScan for week ended April 1 Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Merlins 21 04-08-2007 02:08 PM
Nielsen VideoScan for week ended March 18 Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Merlins 28 03-24-2007 05:57 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:04 PM.