|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.97 1 hr ago
| ![]() $35.99 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#5421 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Juntos num só ritmo (All in one rhythm) Derb, if to you, the whole pitch (field) looks grey-ish - http://www.colourblindawareness.org/...our-blindness/ (except for 2014 FIFA World Cup logo that is), I’m hoping you don’t drive ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5422 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5423 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5424 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
The post company that did the DI for the feature motion picture (OAS:TNC) as described to Kris Deering here – https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...s#post10107534 is currently working on an episodic television show to be produced entirely in HDR.
Have a Happy 4th folks. ![]() Root for our women tomorrow. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5425 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5426 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
![]() No color blindness here though I do have laser eyes which was over "corrected" then 20/20 vision so I see detail more accurately represented from distances further away & up close. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5427 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5428 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5429 | |
Blu-ray Count
Jul 2007
Montreal, Canada
|
![]() Quote:
![]() instead of "I had laser eye surgery" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5431 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Well, with WCG alone coming to UHD, there will be a *modest* improvement to the color, but people shouldn’t expect too much out of WCG (by itself) with a lot of motion pictures. Think about it, in the past when you’ve ventured to a D-Cinema (without the kids) to watch theatrical movies over the years, have you ever walked out after the show thinking/remarking… ‘wow, those colors of that theatrical motion picture presentation looked soooo much better than what I normally see with my Blu-ray movies at home’. I think not. Where WCG can more readily make imagery look more colorful (saturated), if the filmmaker, with the help of the colorist, chooses to exploit the potential, that is, is when the P3 gamut is combined or augmented by the brightness of HDR. Heck, even the colors of Rec. 709 when augmented by HDR can look better than Rec. 709 SDR. Best way to think of the concept is rather than thinking about color gamuts in terms of CIE chromaticity charts and plotted triangles of 709, P3, 2020 as typically depicted for illustrative comparisons.... https://ascmag.com/blog is to envision more of a 3D volumetric appearance, considering both color and intensity (brightness) in order to show the resultant color potential of a particular gamut when you add the brightness of HDR to the traditional intensity. For example, here a pic of P3 color volume in SDR range (~ 0-100 nits) with nits being on the y axis if the numbers are difficult for some to read - ![]() Now, here a pic of HDR P3 color volume boundaries (the larger green cubic like structure enveloping SDR P3) which are roughly possible when grading in HDR (Dolby) displaying on a Pulsar monitor. (in this case, Dolby is calling it EDR which stands for Extended Dynamic Range but that’s just semantics) ![]() ^ you can chop off the top of it a little to the 1,000 nit mark to simulate what some high end LCD consumer displays would be capable of showing. Proof of concept (more brightness = better colors) some folks might ask? Well, as evidenced by the glorious colors of the HDR video clip as seen running on the Sony HDR-capable reference monitor at NAB 2015 described here Albeit, to be precise, with the Sony monitor employing a different EOTF to facilitate the HDR imagery rather than Dolby’s solution and having a max luminance of around 1,000 nits which is admittedly far less than the Dolby Pulsar, but I think the color+brightness proof of concept still easily holds. Last edited by Penton-Man; 10-19-2018 at 02:48 AM. Reason: reposted original pics after the free imaging hosting service I use changed urls/servers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5432 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5434 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5438 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5439 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I thought it good to post a little bit about HDR’s value to color, since that aspect appears undiscovered by the mass media that now blogs about high dynamic range in regards to helping only/primarily with contrast. Furthermore, with hands-on, err, should I perhaps say eyes-on practice even by early HDR feature film/episodic television show content creators, the whole thing is quite disruptive (mostly in a good ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5440 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Very disappointed to see Ant-man with 1.85:1 and a 2K DI. Even worse to see Terminator Genisys with a 2K DI, at least it is a 2.40:1. Both films have Dolby Atmos so hopefully the BD release will have the same, DTS:X will be OK as well.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|