List of 4K film transfers on Blu-ray shot on film (non-digitally shot)

[Pieter V]

Additionally, TF1 are finalizing and planning to introduce a new 4K restoration of Christian-Jaque's classic film The Black Tulip (1964) with Alain Delon

https://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=15259

This Blu-ray from Concorde Video, features the new 4K restoration. Got this confirmed by e-mailing Conorde Video.

[L'armée des ombres]

Originally Posted by Pieter V

https://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=15259

This Blu-ray from Concorde Video, features the new 4K restoration. Got this confirmed by e-mailing Conorde Video.

Added

[amoergosum]

Originally Posted by zzap64

Groundhog Day is also available to buy in Ultra HD (4K).
http://www.amazon.com/Groundhog-Day-Ultra-Richard-Henzel/dp/B00Q0CSDW4

The Japanese Blu-ray of Groundhog Day released on Dec 03 2014 is sourced from this 4K remaster.
http://www.caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergl...n=1&lossless=1

I'd love to see a screenshot comparison between the 4K download and the JP Blu-ray.

[Pieter V]

Credits to 'Home Theater Forum', for sourcing this out for me.

So there you have it, Munich is 4K.

[L'armée des ombres]

Originally Posted by Pieter V

Credits to 'Home Theater Forum', for sourcing this out for me.

So there you have it, Munich is 4K.

You leave no stone unturned Pieter.....added

[Pieter V]

Thanks. Doing my best.

[Pieter V]

Both digital and Film shot.

Sound Mix Dolby Digital | Dolby Atmos | Datasat | Auro 11.1
Color Color
Aspect Ratio 1.90 : 1 (IMAX version)
2.35 : 1
Camera Panavision Panaflex Platinum, Panavision Primo Lenses
Panavision Panaflex System 65 Studio, Panavision System 65 Lenses
Red Epic Dragon
Red Epic M-X
Laboratory Company 3 (digital intermediate)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak)
65 mm (Kodak)
Redcode RAW
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format)
Panavision Super 70 (source format) (some scenes)
Redcode RAW (5K) (source format)
Redcode RAW (6K) (source format)
Super 35 (source format)
Printed Film Format D-Cinema (also 3-D version)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0369610/...ef_=tt_dt_spec

[jscoggins]

Is the IMAX version constant or VAR?

[Pieter V]

[jscoggins]

Originally Posted by Pieter V

[Show spoiler]j/k

[Scorpion Soldier]

Originally Posted by jscoggins

Is the IMAX version constant or VAR?

No confirmation as of yet, but I'd expect a constant 1.90:1 AR for the IMAX 3D version.

[UniSol GR77]

Originally Posted by Pieter V

https://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=15259

This Blu-ray from Concorde Video, features the new 4K restoration. Got this confirmed by e-mailing Conorde Video.

Magic! 4K

[Geoff D]

That's funny, I just checked those JW specs on IMDB before clicking on this thread. I could've sworn that they said they were shooting partially on IMAX, but clearly that's not the case. It's a bit of a mishmash, what with 35mm, 5-perf 65mm, and RED in 5K and 6K.

VERY pleased to see it's getting a 4K finish though, I think that's a first for any simultaneous 2D/3D finish outside of a Sony release. (Though the 3D version may still end up as a 2K deliverable.)

[PeterTHX]

Originally Posted by Scorpion Soldier

No confirmation as of yet, but I'd expect a constant 1.90:1 AR for the IMAX 3D version.

If portions were shot 70MM and anamorphic 35MM then the IMAX version would be cropped.

[BozQ]

Originally Posted by PeterTHX

If portions were shot 70MM and anamorphic 35MM then the IMAX version would be cropped.

If we go according to the details on imdb, 35mm wasn't filmed anamorphic.

But this was shot over so many camera systems, we won't know exactly if the IMAX version is cropped or opened up. My money's in cropped though.

[jscoggins]

Well, the first three were 1.85:1.

I just look at YouTube clips, and they all looked like they're about 1.90:1.

Here we go: they opted for the univisium ratio, 2.00:1.

http://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-...-details-cast/

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=143

[PeterTHX]

Originally Posted by BozQ

If we go according to the details on imdb, 35mm wasn't filmed anamorphic.

Ironic how the film's cinematographer professes his love of anamorphic here:
http://motion.kodak.com/motion/Publi...#ixzz30yDjbs3E

[Geoff D]

Originally Posted by jscoggins

Well, the first three were 1.85:1.

I just look at YouTube clips, and they all looked like they're about 1.90:1.

Here we go: they opted for the univisium ratio, 2.00:1.

http://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-...-details-cast/

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=143

Ah, I thought there was something off about the ratio in the clips, being clearly wider than 1.85 but not enough for 2.35, that's why I checked the specs (about the same time that everyone else did, clearly! ). The RED Dragon shoots raw 6K at 2:1, 65mm will give 2.20, 4-perf Super 35 will give a nice tall negative, this movie's all over the place photographically.

Storaro's probably dancing a jig right about now. Don't get me wrongo, I don't mind 2:1 if it's composed for that (as Trevorrow said, it's damned close to the 1.90 IMAX digital ratio) but cropping 2.35 movies to get there is NOT cool, Vittorio. Not cool.

[BozQ]

Originally Posted by PeterTHX

Ironic how the film's cinematographer professes his love of anamorphic here:
http://motion.kodak.com/motion/Publi...#ixzz30yDjbs3E

Not ironic. Just maybe the details on imdb aren't accurate. I'm not surprised.

But thanks for the article!

[Geoff D]

I should think the specs are correct, they're using flat format(s) as opposed to anamorphic in order to give the captured image a nice balance between height and width (as Peter said, there's no going back with anamorphic, it's widescreen or bust with that format).

The specs suggest it'll be matted to 2.35 for regular DCPs though, so it'll probably be a typical IMAX joint: looks okay in the action scenes but with too much headroom in the talky bits. That's what I hate about all these modern multi-aspect shows: effective composition is taking a back seat to filling da screen.