Avengers: Infinity War (2018)

[Sean B.]

Originally Posted by jayman3

Maybe it'll leak during Comic-Con this week

Originally Posted by Tony208

Put it before ragnarok and get some more box office.

Originally Posted by Gamma_Winstead

No trailer for this one then I take it?

I don't expect the teaser trailer to be released online until October at the earliest, December at the latest. Maybe it will be released online in October considering that the teaser trailers for The Avengers, and Avengers: Age of Ultron were released online in October 2011 and October 2014. That's unless it comes out online in December considering that Iron Man 2 and Thor and GotG Vol2(all of those are May releases), had teaser trailers that were released online in December before the year of their theatrical releases.

[CyberpunkCentral]

lol, I already have seen the trailer for The Avengers: Infinity War.
It looks okay. Doesn't look as epic as the Infinity Gauntlet comic, though. It's just half of The Avengers and the Guardians of the Galaxy fighting Thanos is all. It's not like Infinity Gauntlet is the only comic that Thanos has appeared in. =/

[solarrdadd]

[NARMAK]

Originally Posted by Batmon77

Like Civil War?

Originally Posted by yeslek

With that there wasnt a loss of trust, it was a massive disagreement.

losing trust would be huge

Like mentioned above, it wasn't so much a full on Hero vs Hero like the real Civil War and let's be honest, compared to the actual Civil War comic story, this was an appalling attempt because that comic story had so many amazing moments they simply never did and followed a much different narrative.

Can you imagine if they'd actually shown Peter Parker getting almost murdered and then saved like he does by The Punisher or the many other gruesome moments.

Civil War the MCU movie was more of a slap and tickle without any real danger of anybody killing another apart from maybe Black Panther and Bucky. All the rest were aiming to disable each other. Heck, even mid "fight" you see Black Widow and Hawkeye cracking jokes.

That's kind of why I respect Batman v Superman more in that respect. Batman had a genuine animosity towards Superman during the movie that manifested itself in a proper fight that was gonna lead to him killing Superman. Civil War never even had a hint of that for the "Hero vs Hero".

The Skrulls being involved in a story line creates a great opportunity because unlike the MCU Civil War, a disguised Skrull wouldn't have any qualms of killing a true hero. So they're all gonna fear and mistrust each other.

[CyberpunkCentral]

Tony Stark was a total dick in the Civil War comic.

[Batmon77]

Originally Posted by NARMAK

Like mentioned above, it wasn't so much a full on Hero vs Hero like the real Civil War and let's be honest, compared to the actual Civil War comic story, this was an appalling attempt because that comic story had so many amazing moments they simply never did and followed a much different narrative.

Can you imagine if they'd actually shown Peter Parker getting almost murdered and then saved like he does by The Punisher or the many other gruesome moments.

Civil War the MCU movie was more of a slap and tickle without any real danger of anybody killing another apart from maybe Black Panther and Bucky. All the rest were aiming to disable each other. Heck, even mid "fight" you see Black Widow and Hawkeye cracking jokes.

That's kind of why I respect Batman v Superman more in that respect. Batman had a genuine animosity towards Superman during the movie that manifested itself in a proper fight that was gonna lead to him killing Superman. Civil War never even had a hint of that for the "Hero vs Hero".

The Skrulls being involved in a story line creates a great opportunity because unlike the MCU Civil War, a disguised Skrull wouldn't have any qualms of killing a true hero. So they're all gonna fear and mistrust each other.

You actually thought Captain America: Civil War was going to be like the comic???

Iron Man wasnt angry at Steve and Bucky for killing his parents?

That was way more convincing than Bruce vs Clark who made up after "Martha", then fought Doomsday together. Not much tension or consequence.

Captain America gave up his shield and costume and Bucky lost his arm after the Iron Man fight.

[NARMAK]

Originally Posted by Batmon77

You actually thought Captain America: Civil War was going to be like the comic???

Iron Man wasnt angry at Steve and Bucky for killing his parents?

That was way more convincing than Bruce vs Clark who made up after "Martha", then fought Doomsday together. Not much tension or consequence.

Captain America gave up his shield and costume and Bucky lost his arm after the Iron Man fight.

Also, I didn't think it was going to be like the comic given there hadn't been enough set up in order to do that sort of movie proper justice.

Steve didn't kill Tony's parents but he knew they were killed by Hydra and not by Bucky until he'd watched that video. Also, Batman didn't 'magically' make up and that debate has been to death and there's usually the side that found it worked for them and those that didn't. It worked for me.

Also, Steve sent Tony a nice little letter and burner phone at the end, so I'm not sure there was much consequence there.

If anybody thought Batman v Superman would end up with one dying, clearly you don't realise what the movie was doing or gonna be used for.

[Batmon77]

Originally Posted by NARMAK

Also, I didn't think it was going to be like the comic given there hadn't been enough set up in order to do that sort of movie proper justice.

So why did u use the comic as a comparison?

Steve didn't kill Tony's parents but he knew they were killed by Hydra and not by Bucky until he'd watched that video.

Duh

Also, Batman didn't 'magically' make up and that debate has been to death and there's usually the side that found it worked for them and those that didn't. It worked for me.

It worked for me too, but there was no trust broken between Bruce and Clark, which is what you highlighted for the Hero vs Hero/Skrull story,

Also, Steve sent Tony a nice little letter and burner phone at the end, so I'm not sure there was much consequence there.

Steve left the Avengers. Batman joined Superman and WW within minutes.

If anybody thought Batman v Superman would end up with one dying, clearly you don't realise what the movie was doing or gonna be used for.

____________

[CyberpunkCentral]

Tony Stark is a hypocrite. Bucky unintentionally killed Tony's parents, yet how many lives did Tony took due to his technology and weapons?

[Batmon77]

Originally Posted by CyberpunkCentral

Tony Stark is a hypocrite. Bucky unintentionally killed Tony's parents, yet how many lives did Tony took due to his technology and weapons?

Selling weapons and using them are not the same.

He did feel guilty about it, but I wouldnt sit him at the same table as a brainwashed assassin.

Are u saying Bucky's assassinations are a mistake? He remembers all his kills.

[Rodney-2187]

I think Steve knew Bucky killed Tony's parents before he watched that video. He didn't look very surprised. He probably learned it from the file Natasha gave him at the end of The Winter Soldier.

[R3P0]

Originally Posted by rodneyfaile

I think Steve knew Bucky killed Tony's parents before he watched that video. He didn't look very surprised. He probably learned it from the file Natasha gave him at the end of The Winter Soldier.

He did if you rewatch that scene Tony looks right at him and goes you knew to which Steve replied yes

[CyberpunkCentral]

Originally Posted by Batmon77

Selling weapons and using them are not the same.

He did feel guilty about it, but I wouldnt sit him at the same table as a brainwashed assassin.

Are u saying Bucky's assassinations are a mistake? He remembers all his kills.

[Batmon77]

Originally Posted by rodneyfaile

I think Steve knew Bucky killed Tony's parents before he watched that video. He didn't look very surprised. He probably learned it from the file Natasha gave him at the end of The Winter Soldier.

Arnim Zola showed that Hydra was involved in Starks death, during the history montage in the bunker.

[Rodney-2187]

Originally Posted by Batmon77

Arnim Zola showed that Hydra was involved in Starks death, during the history montage in the bunker.

I'm betting the file Natasha gave him from Kiev had even more information than that.

[Batmon77]

Originally Posted by CyberpunkCentral

He admits Ultron is his fault, but he did not intentionally created a murder-bot.

You dont blame Hank Pym of Ultron in the comic either.

[Batmon77]

Originally Posted by rodneyfaile

I'm betting the file Natasha gave him from Kiev had even more information than that.

Yeah, Zola didnt say who the actual assassin was or how they killed Stark.

[CyberpunkCentral]

Originally Posted by Batmon77

He admits Ultron is his fault, but he did not intentionally created a murder-bot.

You dont blame Hank Pym of Ultron in the comic either.

Just like how Bucky didn't intentionally kill Tony's parents, despite the fact that he remembers the events?

Also Hank Pym is bat-shit crazy in the comics.

[Batmon77]

Originally Posted by CyberpunkCentral

Just like how Bucky didn't intentionally kill Tony's parents, despite the fact that he remembers the events?

Also Hank Pym is bat-shit crazy in the comics.

You equate Hydra's brainwashing w/ Ultron's creation?

[CyberpunkCentral]

Originally Posted by Batmon77

You equate Hydra's brainwashing w/ Ultron's creation?

If both leads to death, then yes.