|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $22.49 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $44.73 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $86.13 | ![]() $96.99 | ![]() $39.99 | ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#144 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
To most it is, but there are a few of us that use good old Analogue 7.1 connections
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#146 |
Blu-ray Ninja
May 2010
Denmark
|
![]()
Me too!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#147 |
Blu-ray Ninja
May 2010
Denmark
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#148 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I think they said at the latest, but I expect to see one before the end of the year, fingers crossed anyway, as I want a Sony player.
Hopefully the price will have come down a little by then too. I know new tech is normally priced high, but this is still essentially blu-ray, just a better version, so the player prices are a little higher than had hoped really. I mean, I was expecting around £300-£400 but wasn't expecting it going back up to £600-£700, like when DVD first came out. |
![]() |
![]() |
#149 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
As I've said before, I considered paying £400 for Panasonic's high-end regular BD player (BDT700) so bolting on another 200 sovs for UHD playback is a no-brainer. Chuck in two movies and that'll do me! Mid-april, here I come! |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#151 |
Junior Member
Nov 2008
|
![]()
3D is long dead.
Samsung and LG are saying that, soon every big company will follow too. |
![]() |
![]() |
#152 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
UHD player: ![]() 5 year old DMT-BDT310 (background is poster's own ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#153 |
Member
Feb 2016
|
![]()
The cellowrap looks to still be present on the top of the player, hence the ultra-gloss. You can see areas where it has been peeled toward the back and more obviously toward the front. (Forgive image repetition, as I haven't figured out how to *SPOILER* the hyperlinks, yet.
![]() Last edited by LuminousMotion; 03-02-2016 at 05:10 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#154 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#156 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#157 |
Special Member
|
![]()
How does it handle Dolby ATMOS and DTS X? I have just bought some speakers I intend to use as ATMOS channels as such I want the player to be able to pass the DTSX/ATMOS to the receiver for it to decode, ideally the sound will be a minimum of 5.1.4 or greater with no loss of quality.
I would rather buy this player instead of the Samsung player mainly because of the problems I have heard the Samsung player has, also the included titles suit me far better than The Martian. |
![]() |
![]() |
#158 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
AFAIK Dolby Atmos and DTS X formats are bitstreamed as extensions to the respective lossless Dolby/DTS formats, so as long as the player squirts TrueHD and DTS-HD over HDMI to a compatible amp (true of most players made for, ooh, the last 8 or 9 years) then it's fine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#160 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Sorry for forgetting the link, im mobile at the moment.
But the price has been announced for the Panasonic uhd player and it's roughly 25-40%cheaper than predicted. One of those European sites has the launch price at 600 instead of the leaked 1000 and is launching mid april |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|