As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$67.11
3 hrs ago
Halloween III: Season of the Witch 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.37
6 hrs ago
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.00
17 hrs ago
Outland 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.32
14 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.54
3 hrs ago
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
 
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
 
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-22-2013, 05:42 PM   #14
Penton-Man Penton-Man is offline
Retired Hollywood Insider
 
Penton-Man's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoetMB View Post
The difference in a movie theatre is that with 2K and a large screen, you get the "screen-door" effect, especially with brightly lit scenes. You don't get that with 4K (or certainly not as much) no matter how crappy the bit rate is...
True, at least depending upon how close you sit to the screen but, keep in mind you’re trading one *evil* (screen-door effect, stairstep jaggies, etc.) for another *evil* (softening due to bit starvation), if frugal bit rates were to be employed in the later situation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoetMB View Post
...And why would they encode a 4K DCP with a frugally encoded bit rate in the first place? As long as it fits on the hard disk, the only issue is the amount of time it takes to upload the DCP, right?
That’s not a small issue, where time = money in any field/profession. For more, see the last paragraph here - https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...er#post7684634

Plus, the smaller the total GB of the movie, the less costly it is to store it long term, and, for instance, replicate it (time factored in again), for something such as a repertory showing several years after the first run exhibition.

If all of the above factors were considered irrelevant then in order to automatically ensure maximal picture quality of all the imagery on the largest of theatrical screens one would be seeing near maximum constant encoding bit rate for 4K DCP (and a resultant file size of roughly 230 GBytes (image only) for just a 2hr. long feature), which we’re not seeing in practice with the deliverables. On the contrary, it seems DCP file sizes of the features themselves have been getting smaller over time.

However, if saving money any which way you can is of some priority, then when you carefully consider the pieces of the entire process, there are subtle incentives to make DCPs as small as possible. Question is how small before astute audiences can notice a decrease in quality? That’s a tough call because you would have to have seen how sharp the original material (the DCDM’s .tiff files) was. Hopefully, the JPEG2000 encoding rates are high enough to remain visually lossless to the original content on the biggest of D-Cinema screens and audiences are getting close to what the filmmakers saw in the D.I. suites….as intended.
  Reply With Quote
 
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 AM.