HDTVTEST (Vincent Teoh) Discussion Thread - Page 21 - Blu-ray Forum

Auditor55 · 02-14-2021, 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scottishguy

Why don't you just show some integrity and honesty and admit you are Quantum.

Are you serious, I'm twice Quantum's age, he's a kid. With that said, out of the mouth of babes comes wisdom, I thank him for exposing those Youtube frauds.

Scottishguy · 02-14-2021, 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Auditor55

Are you serious, I'm twice Quantum's age, he's a kid. With that said, out of the mouth of babes comes wisdom, I thank him for exposing those Youtube frauds.

If your twice his age, you really should be thinking twice about what he is saying.

Or you are Quantum.

Who needs evidence, right?

wxman2003 · 02-14-2021, 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Auditor55

Are you serious, I'm twice Quantum's age, he's a kid. With that said, out of the mouth of babes comes wisdom, I thank him for exposing those Youtube frauds.

I DO BLU · 02-14-2021, 02:02 AM

Auditor55 · 02-14-2021, 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scottishguy

If your twice his age, you really should be thinking twice about what he is saying.

Or you are Quantum.

Who needs evidence, right?

Why? He did in fact expose Vincent, now you can see it. As I said, read the comments on the video he posted. I'm not Quantum but I do share his disdain for dishonesty.

Scottishguy · 02-14-2021, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I DO BLU

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sMz22elLGEk

And who else has out there really has this much of an issue with Vincent? Who else would take the opportunity to discredit Vincent in a thread dedicated to his YouTube?

And Who would also writes posts like Quantum writes comments on YouTube.

Scottishguy · 02-14-2021, 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Auditor55

Why? He did in fact expose Vincent, now you can see it. As I said, read the comments on the video he posted. I'm not Quantum but I do share his disdain for dishonesty.

You share so much in common with Quantum, you might just be Quantum. We have deduced this. You even seem to be in the same time zone as him as well.

Scottishguy · 02-14-2021, 02:15 AM

Lifted this from Quantum TVs "blog" on Facebook

Quote:

They disabled comments again! Nothing to see here. Nothing at all. Don't ever question them, even with ratings like this, and disabled comments. THIS is why people don't like you know what.

Is it just me, or does that read like an Auditor55 post?

Auditor55 · 02-14-2021, 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scottishguy

You share so much in common with Quantum, you might just be Quantum. We have deduced this. You even seem to be in the same time zone as him as well.

He's in Florida and I'm in California.

I DO BLU · 02-14-2021, 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Auditor55

Why? He did in fact expose Vincent, now you can see it. As I said, read the comments on the video he posted. I'm not Quantum but I do share his disdain for dishonesty.

Curious on what he exposed Vincent on. My issue with Vincent is when he called fake HDR when it was what the director intended. Now quantum says it’s washed out colors he is full of crap and if you want your tv on torch mode go with quantum and his $5 settings.

I DO BLU · 02-14-2021, 02:33 AM

motorheadache95 · 02-14-2021, 02:43 AM

Um... all Vincent did was say the CX OLED doesn't quite resolve high-nit detail as well as brighter LCD's. He even included a montage of him mentioning this in old reviews.

Who cares? I have a C6 OLED that only goes to like, 500-something nits and HDR looks great on it. I don't care if it's not THE BEST at everything. It's just something to consider when you want to buy a new TV and where your priorities are in terms of PQ. I like the picture of OLED so if I was going to buy a new TV soon, I'd probably get the C1 when it came out over an LCD. But I'd rather my C6 last me at least a few more years, and then who knows?

wxman2003 · 02-14-2021, 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by motorheadache95

Um... all Vincent did was say the CX OLED doesn't quite resolve high-nit detail as well as brighter LCD's. He even included a montage of him mentioning this in old reviews.

Who cares? I have a C6 OLED that only goes to like, 500-something nits and HDR looks great on it. I don't care if it's not THE BEST at everything. It's just something to consider when you want to buy a new TV and where your priorities are in terms of PQ. I like the picture of OLED so if I was going to buy a new TV soon, I'd probably get the C1 when it came out over an LCD. But I'd rather my C6 last me at least a few more years, and then who knows?

Actually you will be surprised that the C6 peaks out around 650 nits in HDR. Not much lower than current models.

https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/c6-oled

Fendergopher · 02-14-2021, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wxman2003

Actually you will be surprised that the C6 peaks out around 650 nits in HDR. Not much lower than current models.

https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/c6-oled

Each individual unit will vary in peak brightness, those measurements of their particular model isn't 100% reliable, not to mention how different picture settings will affect peak brightness as well.

wxman2003 · 02-14-2021, 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fendergopher

Each individual unit will vary in peak brightness, those measurements of their particular model isn't 100% reliable, not to mention how different picture settings will affect peak brightness as well.

True, but the 2016 models E6, G6 and C6 consistently hit 600 nits or higher in HDR after calibration which was measured by several people over on AVS back in 2016 when these models came out. The B6 with the lack of the 3D filter was closer to 700 nits. 600 nits was considered the low end on the 2016 models.

Of course, almost 5 years later, with normal usage, none of them will likely hit 600 nits anymore due to pixel degradation and aging. That peak brightness will probably only be hit within the first year on any OLED tv.

Darkmninya · 02-14-2021, 11:14 AM

who the hell watch's 400 Nits HDR? Oled goes to 650Nits currently , what he is comparing is absolutely bullshit and pure Marketing

The better comparison would be 1000Nits vs 650Nits with Tone Mapping. But he won't make that video because Like I said hugely paid by LG, Samsung or somebody

Scottishguy · 02-14-2021, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkmninya

who the hell watch's 400 Nits HDR? Oled goes to 650Nits currently , what he is comparing is absolutely bullshit and pure Marketing.

He is probably paid By LG to make this video

The better comparison would be 1000Nits vs 650Nits with Tone Mapping. But he won't make that video because Like I said hugely paid by LG.

Well this is interesting.

Scottishguy · 02-14-2021, 03:32 PM

Not long after I start accusing Auditor of being Quantum, does a random sock turn up ranting and raving about Vincent.

How unsurprisingly amateurish. Anyone can tell that because the first account got compromised, you thought that using a second one to reinforce this pack of lies would succeed. But in fact all it's achieved is showing how frightened you are not to be exposed and, thus. Has ironically lead to yourself being closer to exposure.

So, if this is indeed the case. Just give up Quantum, as you've tried and failed to hijack this thread in your unhealthy obsession to ruin Vincents professional reputation.

And I hope as a result of this, you've realised you aren't anywhere near as intelligent as you might think you are pal.

I DO BLU · 02-14-2021, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scottishguy

Not long after I start accusing Auditor of being Quantum, does a random sock turn up ranting and raving about Vincent.

How unsurprisingly amateurish. Anyone can tell that because the first account got compromised, you thought that using a second one to reinforce this pack of lies would succeed. But in fact all it's achieved is showing how frightened you are not to be exposed and, thus. Has ironically lead to yourself being closer to exposure.

So, if this is indeed the case. Just give up Quantum, as you've tried and failed to hijack this thread in your unhealthy obsession to ruin Vincents professional reputation.

And I hope as a result of this, you've realised you aren't anywhere near as intelligent as you might think you are pal.

Look at the video above of his burn in scare real professional

wxman2003 · 02-14-2021, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkmninya

who the hell watch's 400 Nits HDR? Oled goes to 650Nits currently , what he is comparing is absolutely bullshit and pure Marketing

The better comparison would be 1000Nits vs 650Nits with Tone Mapping. But he won't make that video because Like I said hugely paid by LG, Samsung or somebody

I think we know who you are. The exact same post on AVS. Almost word for word.

https://www.avsforum.com/threads/202...#post-60500621

02-14-2021, 11:14 AM	#416
Darkmninya Member Member since:Feb 2020	who the hell watch's 400 Nits HDR? Oled goes to 650Nits currently , what he is comparing is absolutely bullshit and pure Marketing The better comparison would be 1000Nits vs 650Nits with Tone Mapping. But he won't make that video because Like I said hugely paid by LG, Samsung or somebody Last edited by Darkmninya; 02-14-2021 at 11:34 AM.

02-14-2021, 02:43 AM	#412
motorheadache95 Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Jul 2009	Um... all Vincent did was say the CX OLED doesn't quite resolve high-nit detail as well as brighter LCD's. He even included a montage of him mentioning this in old reviews. Who cares? I have a C6 OLED that only goes to like, 500-something nits and HDR looks great on it. I don't care if it's not THE BEST at everything. It's just something to consider when you want to buy a new TV and where your priorities are in terms of PQ. I like the picture of OLED so if I was going to buy a new TV soon, I'd probably get the C1 when it came out over an LCD. But I'd rather my C6 last me at least a few more years, and then who knows?

02-14-2021, 03:32 PM	#418
Scottishguy Banned Member since:Apr 2019 4K collection:134 Blu-ray collection:1989 DVD collection:26 Trading Score:1	Not long after I start accusing Auditor of being Quantum, does a random sock turn up ranting and raving about Vincent. How unsurprisingly amateurish. Anyone can tell that because the first account got compromised, you thought that using a second one to reinforce this pack of lies would succeed. But in fact all it's achieved is showing how frightened you are not to be exposed and, thus. Has ironically lead to yourself being closer to exposure. So, if this is indeed the case. Just give up Quantum, as you've tried and failed to hijack this thread in your unhealthy obsession to ruin Vincents professional reputation. And I hope as a result of this, you've realised you aren't anywhere near as intelligent as you might think you are pal.

Best 4K Blu-ray Deals