|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $7.50 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $13.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $32.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $28.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $16.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $82.99 |
![]() |
#2681 | |
Junior Member
Sep 2007
|
![]() Quote:
By my recollection, his constant insistence about BD replication issues, even after BD insiders stated otherwise, led to a feeding frenzy on the HD-DVD side that resulted in the BLU insiders leaving AVS in disgust. He should have had the good sense to know when to backoff. Instead he got intoxicated by all his new found HDDVD friends and decided he would make a name for himself. He has succeeded at that. I am not sure why there is talk here about letting him back. Has he asked to be let back in ? Let him contact the MODS and let them decide. ![]() |
|
![]() |
#2682 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#2683 |
Senior Member
Feb 2007
|
![]()
I don't see why DV should be made an insider since he appa. regurgitates talking-points fed him. As one mod already stated, his own sources are better than DV's and our other insiders are without compare.
DV can sign up as a member and individuals can then welcome/ignore him, but I hope no one is thinking of giving him insider status. For what inside info exactly? He is a movie reviewer but the man clearly spent more time harping on about replication rather than PQ and AQ of the two formats. I do not see how he has contributed anything to our appreciation of HDM other than by leaking nielsens 2 days early. 2c |
![]() |
#2684 | |
Senior Member
Feb 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Are you aware of any formal statement made by the HD DVD promo group on recent events (unless the remarks by Ken Graffeo was the HD DVD statement)? They did promise one recently but I haven't seen it. |
|
![]() |
#2685 | |
Member
Sep 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#2686 | ||
Senior Member
Feb 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
#2687 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Speaking of Paramount, any Star Trek fans in the house? ![]() "History is replete with turning points, Lieutenant. You must have faith." |
|
![]() |
#2688 |
Special Member
Dec 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2689 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
LOL . What damn phonies |
|
![]() |
#2690 | |||
Senior Member
Feb 2007
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.betanews.com/article/HD_D...ors/1199974983 Quote:
Quote:
![]() Last edited by Fozziwig; 01-12-2008 at 01:28 PM. |
|||
![]() |
#2691 | |
Special Member
Jun 2007
|
![]() Quote:
To err is human; to forgive, divine, but to forgive and forget is the best way to get burned twice. I say no. |
|
![]() |
#2692 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
A question for any insider who knows the answer:
I'm curious about how QC works for disc replication. We're told yields are around 80% for BD-50s, but anecdotal evidence suggests faulty discs reaching retail are few and far between. My scientific mind would like to know how exactly the testing of each disc is done to so accurately reject 20% of manufactured discs. I can see that each disc could be read in a drive to compare the data against reference data, but I would expect that to take too long to be done with every disc. |
![]() |
#2693 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Mar 2007
|
![]()
Basically, we're in a holding pattern until late Jan.
![]() |
![]() |
#2694 |
Power Member
![]() Aug 2007
North Potomac, MD
|
![]()
I think the HD DVD PRG now is about as functional as a dog going around in circles trying to catch its tail. Then again my apologies to the dog since it at least has an objective.
![]() |
![]() |
#2695 | |
Active Member
Jan 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Edit:I missed Wick earlier post, I apologize. I should not have posted this here. Last edited by shug7272; 01-12-2008 at 03:39 PM. |
|
![]() |
#2696 | |
Active Member
Jul 2007
|
![]()
I wasn't here when DV was and from some of the links people have put up, I'm very glad of that. What perplexes me at this point is Wicky laid it out for everyone about as plain as you can put it. The guy is not welcome back, at least in this lifetime. Why is this still a point of discussion?
We've got a great bunch of "real" insiders here with Max, Penton, Talk and the rest. Not only do they provide some great info current and background and generally speaking do so with a unique delivery. I enjoy reading their stuff anyway. The ship is sailing on smooth waters, there's no reason to rock the boat by bringing the riff-raff aboard. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#2697 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
Our insiders are awesome, but in some ways this website has turned into some kind of personality cult. Conflicts between insiders shouldn't be a reason to keep someone from participating here. |
|
![]() |
#2698 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#2700 |
Active Member
|
![]()
DV is not an insider, he's a wannabe and a troublemaker. I don't know if he creates FUD himself or if his low-level "sources" are playing him for a fool, and I don't care. I don't want him here ever, period.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Archived: Insiders Thread | Insider Discussion | Deciazulado | 7061 | 12-16-2007 05:22 PM |
|
|