|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $82.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.95 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $47.49 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.59 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $23.60 1 day ago
| ![]() $101.99 | ![]() $41.99 15 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#5801 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
The big catalog releases have already had their initial BD releases. There is no longer a Star Wars or Indiana Jones box set waiting in the wings. Disney has released most of their golden classics with a few exceptions. So don't get depressed about disc sales. If the yearly movie BO is bad because of bad product it's not realistic to think consumers will pay top dollar for it when on disc. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5802 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
Apr 2011
|
![]() Quote:
in regards to what Tok said about the lack of big releases, I have to agree. I think that is why they are jumping onto things like 3D for home - it gives them an excuse to re-release something. I mean, Wizard of Oz had 2 major releases in 5 years, same with Casablanca. Star Wars and Star Trek were both released on bluray less than 5 years ago and were re-released again recently. Right now, anything big that isn't new has pretty much been released already. Sure there are still movies that people want that are not out yet but nothing huge. that is going to impact sales. and even the re-releases are not helping that much - people hate when studios double-dip so are you going to buy that second release just because it is in 3D? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5803 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
Theatrical windows used be a year. Then it was reduced to six months, then to four months and even that is frequently violated. The theatres were smart enough to refuse to show a movie last year that was going to be day and date available streaming. There are movie executives pushing for simultaneous release in all media, but I think this is an extremely self-destructive impulse. They think they want it because it would save marketing dollars and it would potentially improve cash flow which would raise their stock price (and their bonuses) in the short term, but destroy the business in the long term, because IMO, movies would no longer seem 'important'. The one thing actually saving theatres in the U.S. right now is the still relatively poor economy. In many places, the building or land that the theatre occupies couldn't be used for anything else, because no developer is willing to invest. But as I've posted before, where real-estate is hot, theatres are gone. In NYC, which used to be the biggest movie-town in the country (at one time, NYC had 29 theatres with more than 2800 seats each), no longer has a single movie theatre on Broadway between 20th and 66th streets and has lost many theatres over the last decade with the Union Square 14 and the Cinema 1,2,3 rumored to be next. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5804 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Apr 2011
|
![]()
I think part of it is that movies are for the most part no longer an experience. you went to the theatre to see something you couldn't see at home on tv but that has now changed. with vhs, you were able to start bringing the movies home to watch but you had to wait. now because of the money involved, studios are bringing them out sooner and sooner. tv isn't immune to this - look how many times a series or seasons ends and you can find that season in store to buy within a week. but the other part is that movies were, for lack of a better term, more mature than tv was. it was a more realistic take on life compared to tv. but that has changed over the years and shows on tv are doing things that you could only do in movies in the past. I think that is hurting theatres now as there are few big movies/experiences out there and I think eventually we will have the direct streaming instead of releasing into theatres. I think once that starts happening, then optical media is in trouble as why would a studio stream it and then go through the hassle of releasing a bluray when they can just let people download that same file and take it with them anywhere?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5805 |
Banned
|
![]()
Why would that matter. Movies in theaters also get physical media releases just because movies gets streamed instead of going to theaters does not mean that physical media is in trouble. Its just streaming and theaters that gets reversed. That has nothing to do with physical or optical media.
Besides i dont think that will ever happen. To think theaters will go away is just crazy because that will never happen |
![]() |
![]() |
#5806 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
![]() FWIW, we have been looking into the purchase of a 2014 Chrysler T&C Limited mini-van. It comes with a CD\DVD\Blu-ray player and two monitors. Does not do a thing for me but for some it may have appeal. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5807 |
Active Member
Sep 2013
|
![]()
I have been secretly buying UV/iTunes copies from forums for cheap. Usually 3-4 bucks a movie. It is a pretty good deal if you ask me.
I just read that Blockbuster is closing, so I wonder what these former members are going to do, are they just going to switch to Redbox or perhaps move over to streaming. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5809 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5810 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I predict that as streaming adoption increases, caps will get worse and worse and eventually only the 5 richest kings in Europe will be able to afford to stream video on the internet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5811 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Some of the heavy users of Netflix over at AVS have changed their settings for lower quality video, a few said they paid the difference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5813 |
Member
|
![]()
That's why everyone needs to support physical media. If it goes away, look out, you will be paying more than you ever did for Blu-ray and the quality will be crap.
I'm thankful for my collection and at least I know I will have it in the future to enjoy all my favorite movies without having to pay for them and being able to watch them whenever I want, etc. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5814 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5815 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5817 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Actually Google and Verizon has halted ALL of their expansion plans for fiber. IIRC Google will finish the Austin TX install but that will end it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5818 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I can't believe that some think these big corporations are going to play nice with consumers. It's all about profit. Google and none of the others are going to give ISP services away for free.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5819 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]()
Well, another store is ceasing to sell optical media online i believe. Sainsburys in the UK will only sell blurays from their retail stores and not online store from next year I understand. This is a worrying trend. I use amazon, but if they decide to cease selling blurays etc.. We are screwed. I can see a scenario where potentially, Amazon could dictate the market. Amazon may (in my opinion) push downloads and streaming and stop producing blurays to ensure their goal. Just my theory of course.
Regardless, soon online stores for optical media is going to be as rare as high street stores. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5820 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
I doubt that Amazon would ever quit selling optical media as one of their goals is to compete with "brick and mortar" competitors like Best Buy/Future Shop, Walmart, and Target and they do make a high percentage of their profits from the sale of electronics and optical media. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
4-k uhd, blu-ray, ds9, failure, frustrated, oar, star trek deep space nine |
|
|