|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $35.94 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.60 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $101.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.68 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.54 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.10 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $48.44 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 |
![]() |
#324 | |
Expert Member
|
![]()
Am really interested for Glory, it already had a great transfer but for such a stunningly shot film 4k could do miracles. Also would like Spiderman as the old transfer is a bit rough around the edges, though I assumed that was because of the 2k DI it had. Not sure whether if the whole movie went through a DI but if it did I am wondering if Sony upscaled all the effects scenes and re-rendered them in 4k. Spiderman 2 already had 4k DI and it looks pitch perfect on Blu-ray. And as for Ghostbusters I'm sure the transfer will be better, the first release looked grainy because 1080p is too less to render the fine anamorphic grain. And at 4k an anamorphic film is actually 6k as the full 1:33:1 35mm frame is scanned at 4k then unsqueezed to 2:39:1 digitally putting out 6k Res Final Files. And in that process the grain is very fine and beautifully resolved, like in the exemplary transfers of Thin Red Line, Apocalyse Now, Blade Runner, Bridge on the River Kwai, Blade Runner and Jaws. Though I'm not personally buying it as it's not a film I'm that fond of, didn't buy the first release either.
Another film that would really benifit from 4k is Close Encounters of the Third Kind, the first release is incredibly grainy which I'm sure a 4k Transfer would do a better job at rendering. And I agree that Universal could earn a good buck taking this initiative themselves. They should re release 2/4th of their catalog releases which are crap with new scans, separte discs for the extras and nice fat digibooks and and a few steelbooks for the UK Market. Quote:
Same thing with Total Recall and Amazing Spiderman, just more damn bitrate. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#325 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#326 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Why shouldn't they do this for all Blu-ray's, max out the video bitrate, give us either an uncompressed or lossless audio track, then stick (if any) special features onto a single 25GB or 50GB disc. Get rid of this DVD, Digital copy crap, and give us the best of what Blu-ray can provide. At the end of the day we are buying Blu-ray's to watch the film, why should it look and sound inferior. I would rather pay £15 for quality rather than quantity.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#327 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#328 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#333 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]()
Most of these we've already seen in 1080p using the 4K masters since they are recent releases. That was my point earlier. There shouldn't hardly a difference, if any.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#334 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Will all these 4k releases have a higher resolution than 1080p? I thought the current release of Taxi Driver was mastered in 4k? Also curious to see what the reviews will be like, some of these have already been given a 5/5 in picture and audio quality so I wonder how they'll grade these.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#335 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#336 | |
Banned
Feb 2012
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#337 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#338 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]()
But these aren't for 4K displays. Sony is simply stating these 1080p BD releases were taken from 4K masters, which most already on their initial release. A 4K physical format has not been finalized as of yet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#340 |
Banned
Feb 2012
|
![]()
If it's confusing a lot of the people here, I can only imagine how bewildered Average Joe Moviewatcher will be when these hit the stands!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|