|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $35.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $35.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.00 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.48 | ![]() $35.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.33 |
![]() |
#2181 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Debate ammunition for you ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2182 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2183 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Context - You mean Stewart was wrong? http://blog.chron.com/techblog/2008/...5-inches-wide/ And the future is actually 1.6” diagonal ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2184 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I also want my smartwatch in 3D. Just for the immersion. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2187 | ||
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#2188 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Ok, so this is odd...
I'm surfing Amazon Cyber Monday deals and I see they are trying to pedal a Samsung 4K tv. What struck me as odd was in the main headline.... "free 4K content with Samsung 4K tv". So I click on the link and come to this: http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html/ref=gb1h_tit_c-2_1282_27cabfb3?docId=1001481851&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DE R&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_s=cent er-2&pf_rd_r=1Z34AHYDJB18RBFBYB7R&pf_rd_i=1288710011& pf_rd_p=1682211282 You click on details within that and come to a Samsung rebate page with zero details: http://4kmovies.samsungrebate.com/ Looks like two disc boxes? I thought poorly marketed 1080p Blu-rays from a 4K master perhaps? That would be pretty shady in my opinion. However, you click on "faqs" and one of them reads near the end: I just registered. When will I receive my content box?Wait, what? Content box? ..... Hard drive? ![]() Does anyone else have IMAX movies on a hard drive from Samsung or anyone else? What are the details on this? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2189 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2192 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Seem to recall reading the press announcement from Samsung back in early November. I think they’re sending out the content to consumers vis-a-vie the 500GB model - http://www.seagate.com/www-content/s...xternal-ds.pdf
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2193 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Varg’s link to digitaltrends is depicting the ventral aspect of a manta ray. ![]() Any fellow divers out there? What’s dee name of dem little yellow fishies in the top right hand corner? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2194 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2196 |
Banned
|
![]()
I figured it was a good idea back in the spring to take word of a possible BDA announcement of a 4k BD standard before the end of the year with a shaker of salt. Do we have any news since the Singulus 100Gb disc production line news from September?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2197 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
I would say that the only remotely related news (which, to my knowledge, hasn’t been reported on any of the consumer forums or by the audio/video journalists) is that this autumn the Hollywood studios proposed using the XYZ color space for encoding which has evolved into a formal project in SMPTE. If the project is successful, the intent is to complete this standard by March 2014 so it can then be sent onto the JCT-VC and the compression groups. While it hasn't been officially stated, this project appears to be the standards groundwork for signals going to the Dolby HDR monitors with an intention towards making the next generation Blu-ray format have this same capability. We shall see. The whole color space issue is a very complex subject from both a technical and business implementation standpoint. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2198 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
For example…a fun utility for color scientists - http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/plugins/color-inspector.html#!
Anyway, so what is the significance of all this discussion over these past pages about HFR, HDR, wider color space, color subsampling and increased bit depth?...other than to put everyone to sleep. Well, we want UHD-1 to progress in terms of improved picture and audio quality….most assuredly to settle out at something better than 8-bit 4k @ 60fps, *non-immersive* audio. The *fly in the ointment* is that these enhanced parameters to basic vanilla 4k come with varying degrees of implementation and economic drawbacks. Sure, everyone wants the ‘ultimate’ 4k standards (like Joe K.), but the real challenge is to determine how much improvement you will get by upgrading certain parameters and at what economic cost (i.e. the practicality of it all). For instance, I would say that about half of all UHD-1 contributing engineers and scientists feel that HDR will bring better picture quality than HFR; whereas, the other half feels the exact opposite. Then you have to consider which feature would be the most expensive to offer, at the time. Then there’s colorimetry and different perspectives about that - https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...ry#post8249641 TV manufacturers want the cheapest solution (for them). Hollywood studios envision cost savings (for them) by applying much the same work already involved with mastering for D-Cinema (XYZ components) but extending that to TV production and home delivery….kind of ignoring/downplaying any possible substantial hardware upgrades (more powerful processing, etc.) needed to make it all happen by the consumer electronics industry. ITU sees BT.2020 colorimetry as a practical compromise between 709 and XYZ. And of course, let’s not forget to applaud (rather than condemn) our early adopters of 4k devices (Geoff, etc.) for it is upon their spending backs that the 4k evolution will proceed ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2199 |
Banned
|
![]()
Re ^^ Is it your surmise/understanding that there is as much of a divide as you mention in your fourth para ("Sure, everyone wants . . .") over the other matter of going to market with a format based on "ultimate 4k" standards versus "vanilla 4k"? FWIW my sense of it is that by the time debates over "ultimate 4k" parameters as you've described them get resolved much less a standard codified, the ship may have sailed even farther from port on packaged media entirely.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2200 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|