As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
2 hrs ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
10 hrs ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
12 hrs ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
17 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Death Line 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
2 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
8 hrs ago
Signs 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.00
3 hrs ago
Bloodstained Italy (Blu-ray)
$42.99
5 hrs ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2007, 03:43 PM   #1
Julman Julman is offline
Member
 
Apr 2007
Wink Like the days of DIVX...

If I remember correctly, back in the day of the DVD vs. DIVX format war Paramount supported DIVX hoping to do away with DVD. They lost millions due to their incompetence and lack of technical awareness. DVD is still going strong. When's the last time you heard of someone playing a DIVX disc. Much will be the same with HD-DVD. Paramount will learn the hard way once again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 03:58 PM   #2
BLUE BALLS BLUE BALLS is offline
Banned
 
BLUE BALLS's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
London Ontario Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julman View Post
If I remember correctly, back in the day of the DVD vs. DIVX format war Paramount supported DIVX hoping to do away with DVD. They lost millions due to their incompetence and lack of technical awareness. DVD is still going strong. When's the last time you heard of someone playing a DIVX disc. Much will be the same with HD-DVD. Paramount will learn the hard way once again.
Ya Disney also backed DIVx so one may want to rethink the studio bashing before one steps in the droppings left behind.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 04:13 PM   #3
Matt X Matt X is offline
Senior Member
 
Matt X's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
Default

...along w/the underhanded tactics that supporters of the INFERIOR format pulled. I worked @ CC during that battle, and they were pulling s&*t like tripling the commissions on the DIVX players vs. DVD. some of the sales guys were just about making a buck, but many saw through the BS-----
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 04:21 PM   #4
Julman Julman is offline
Member
 
Apr 2007
Default

True but Disney learned from their mistake and now are backing the right horse. Sadly Paramount has not learned from their million dollar mistakes in the past and now are doomed to repeat it. Much like Circuit City/Divx paying out companies for their support. The same is happening with HD-DVD. Looks like a last ditch effort and history repeating itself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 04:41 PM   #5
BLUE BALLS BLUE BALLS is offline
Banned
 
BLUE BALLS's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
London Ontario Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julman View Post
True but Disney learned from their mistake and now are backing the right horse. Sadly Paramount has not learned from their million dollar mistakes in the past and now are doomed to repeat it. Much like Circuit City/Divx paying out companies for their support. The same is happening with HD-DVD. Looks like a last ditch effort and history repeating itself.
Yes but Disney's CEO even said at teh annual meeting that they would be backing both formats in the coming year. So unless he goes back on the statwement he made to many many shareholders and doesn't care about keeping his lofty perch at TWDC he had best live up to his statement or he may find himself looking for a new position by way of being voted out by the shareholders he made priomises to. I will personally cast my vote to remove him if he goes back on this statement he made to myself and every other shareholder in attendance and by proxy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 04:45 PM   #6
monkyman monkyman is offline
Special Member
 
monkyman's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUE BALLS View Post
Yes but Disney's CEO even said at teh annual meeting that they would be backing both formats in the coming year.

I highly doubt it since they are haveing the Bluray tour as we speak.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 05:01 PM   #7
BLUE BALLS BLUE BALLS is offline
Banned
 
BLUE BALLS's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
London Ontario Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monkyman View Post
I highly doubt it since they are haveing the Bluray tour as we speak.
You are correct they are having a BR tour just remember a tour doesn't mean the be all and end all of support. I can see them releasing BR for the remainder of the year and start with HD DVD support after that. Remember even a CEO is held accountable by shareholders and if they say they are going to do something and then don't to their shareholders there are reprecussions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 04:56 PM   #8
alpinewiz alpinewiz is offline
Member
 
alpinewiz's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
33
55
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUE BALLS View Post
Yes but Disney's CEO even said at teh annual meeting that they would be backing both formats in the coming year. So unless he goes back on the statwement he made to many many shareholders and doesn't care about keeping his lofty perch at TWDC he had best live up to his statement or he may find himself looking for a new position by way of being voted out by the shareholders he made priomises to. I will personally cast my vote to remove him if he goes back on this statement he made to myself and every other shareholder in attendance and by proxy.
If you can please post a link to the notes on that shareholder meeting.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 05:05 PM   #9
BLUE BALLS BLUE BALLS is offline
Banned
 
BLUE BALLS's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
London Ontario Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpinewiz View Post
If you can please post a link to the notes on that shareholder meeting.
I wouldn't even know where to begin to look for any minutes that would have been taken from teh meeting. I guess we could start with Disney directly I am sure they must have taken minutes and notes at the meeting but not 100% sure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 07:29 PM   #10
Chris Gerhard Chris Gerhard is offline
Banned
 
Feb 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julman View Post
True but Disney learned from their mistake and now are backing the right horse. Sadly Paramount has not learned from their million dollar mistakes in the past and now are doomed to repeat it. Much like Circuit City/Divx paying out companies for their support. The same is happening with HD-DVD. Looks like a last ditch effort and history repeating itself.
If Paramount has received a $150,000,000 payment/incentive package, how do you figure they have not learned from their mistake? Paramount would never and I mean never make $150,000,000 profit from the sales of Blu-ray discs. How could they turn this deal down and if the same deal is offered to Warner, how can they turn it down? I don't hold anything against Paramount for making this business decision. The really puzzling part is how in the world does the $150,000,000 get recouped by the companies that paid it? There just isn't that kind of market possible, particularly as long as the format war continues. I would like to see the return on investment calculation for that deal in a few years.

Chris
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 07:37 PM   #11
EricJ EricJ is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
The Paradise of New England
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Gerhard View Post
If Paramount has received a $150,000,000 payment/incentive package, how do you figure they have not learned from their mistake? Paramount would never and I mean never make $150,000,000 profit from the sales of Blu-ray discs. How could they turn this deal down and if the same deal is offered to Warner, how can they turn it down?
They can turn it down when it suddenly gets a lot of bad industry press they, um, didn't expect it to, not to mention buzzings about having your company investigated by the SEC, legitimate deal or not.

There are easy ways of doing things, and there are hard ways, and one of the easy ways is to wait and see what happens to somebody else.

(Also, Warner's only continuing to support HD to keep their TotalHD dual-disk investments alive, a bit of money they would also ironically lose if they gave up Blu tomorrow--
Whether Microsoft likes it or not, Warner's forced to be neutral, because they just don't have much darn choice.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:11 PM   #12
BigB88 BigB88 is offline
Active Member
 
BigB88's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Gerhard View Post
If Paramount has received a $150,000,000 payment/incentive package, how do you figure they have not learned from their mistake? Paramount would never and I mean never make $150,000,000 profit from the sales of Blu-ray discs. How could they turn this deal down and if the same deal is offered to Warner, how can they turn it down? I don't hold anything against Paramount for making this business decision. The really puzzling part is how in the world does the $150,000,000 get recouped by the companies that paid it? There just isn't that kind of market possible, particularly as long as the format war continues. I would like to see the return on investment calculation for that deal in a few years.

Chris
Paramount is already suffering, they are getting bad press, talent is beginning to move against them and all for a couple of bucks in the short term. The long term implications could be catostrophic for them. The majority of people in this country (and in others) don't like Corporate greed and this is exactly what this is. You are going to witness a pretty substantial backlash because Paramount didn't make this move for any reason but Corporate greed. IMHO, they are going to lose way more then 150 million.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 09:34 PM   #13
EricJ EricJ is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
The Paradise of New England
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigB88 View Post
Paramount is already suffering, they are getting bad press, talent is beginning to move against them and all for a couple of bucks in the short term. The long term implications could be catostrophic for them. The majority of people in this country (and in others) don't like Corporate greed and this is exactly what this is. You are going to witness a pretty substantial backlash because Paramount didn't make this move for any reason but Corporate greed. IMHO, they are going to lose way more then 150 million.
And again, before we bash the messenger, keep in mind Dreamworks, Nickelodeon and MTV would have been much more lucrative HD cash-cows for Microsoft to gain a foothold in, and more public jewels in the crown to covet--
(We seem to see a lot of promotion over Transformers and Shrek3, both DW films, but no handsprings over Stardust or Hot Rod...)

And the only way Micro could have gotten HD's hands on Dreamworks and Nickelodeon and MTV and SNL Films and Paramount would have been to do exactly what companies do, Microsoft included--Go to the Source. Namely Viacom.
All Paramount is guilty of doing is giving in to their corporate masters, and toeing the press-statement line...The Mountain may be taking the blame, but good detectives don't fall for the decoy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 04:44 PM   #14
mikem471 mikem471 is offline
Banned
 
mikem471's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUE BALLS View Post
Ya Disney also backed DIVx so one may want to rethink the studio bashing before one steps in the droppings left behind.
What are you still doing here, asswipe? Are you that much of a nerd that as soon as the Paramount announcement was made you had to rush over to this site? Piss off
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
30 Days of Night Sequel: Dark Days Movies MyBlu-rayBrotherEd 92 10-13-2010 02:04 PM
When 3-5 business days turns into 13 days Retail/Shopping DIGITALBATH 4 02-26-2010 01:36 AM
Divx? PS3 PEDXING 2 03-02-2008 03:21 AM
Divx Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology scott87 2 05-24-2007 09:14 AM
DivX Blu-ray Players and Recorders yossi1983 3 07-20-2005 12:01 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 PM.