As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
3 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
19 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
19 hrs ago
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
1 day ago
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Display Theory and Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2007, 02:16 PM   #1
radagast radagast is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
radagast's Avatar
 
May 2007
Indianapolis
Default 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio

Sony is bringing an OLED tv soon with 1,000,000 to 1 contrast ratio.

http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/News...x?NewsId=21516
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:22 PM   #2
tron3 tron3 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
tron3's Avatar
 
Aug 2004
New Jersey
3
Default

NICE! But the estimated 30,000 hour life translates into 3.52 years of constant use. Or 10.27 years if you run it 8 hours a day. 13.7 years if you run it 6 hours a day. That is only IF the estimated life is correct.

Been waiting for OLED TV for a long time, but considering the size and price, I'm not going to let that stop me from buying LCD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:30 PM   #3
radagast radagast is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
radagast's Avatar
 
May 2007
Indianapolis
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tron3 View Post
NICE! But the estimated 30,000 hour life translates into 3.52 years of constant use. Or 10.27 years if you run it 8 hours a day. 13.7 years if you run it 6 hours a day. That is only IF the estimated life is correct.
I believe the figures for est. life. It's a new technology. You know "early adopters". Remember how far other technologies have come. I am quite confident that Sony will, in time, extend the life of the technology.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 03:42 PM   #4
daisuke149 daisuke149 is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tron3 View Post
NICE! But the estimated 30,000 hour life translates into 3.52 years of constant use. Or 10.27 years if you run it 8 hours a day. 13.7 years if you run it 6 hours a day. That is only IF the estimated life is correct.

Been waiting for OLED TV for a long time, but considering the size and price, I'm not going to let that stop me from buying LCD.

ur forgetting a few things

the samsung is now 100,000 to 1.. not 500k..

also sony doesnt inflate their contrast like samsung does. also being a new tech waittill u seeit.. : ) u may be suprised
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 09:26 PM   #5
Blu-Light Blu-Light is offline
Expert Member
 
Oct 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tron3 View Post
NICE! But the estimated 30,000 hour life translates into 3.52 years of constant use. Or 10.27 years if you run it 8 hours a day. 13.7 years if you run it 6 hours a day. That is only IF the estimated life is correct.

Been waiting for OLED TV for a long time, but considering the size and price, I'm not going to let that stop me from buying LCD.
If you watch your TV 8 hours a day you need some serious help!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 06:03 AM   #6
JonD7 JonD7 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
JonD7's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Cali
86
251
Send a message via AIM to JonD7 Send a message via MSN to JonD7 Send a message via Yahoo to JonD7
Default

ah yeah, sounds like this would be great for a PSP 2, haha

I uh... I watch tv for more then 8 hours a day actually... *cough*
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 03:29 PM   #7
Blu Tiger Blu Tiger is offline
Special Member
 
Blu Tiger's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Denver, CO
725
27
Default

So will OLEDs be better than pioneer's new plasma technology? Anyone?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 07:30 PM   #8
welwynnick welwynnick is offline
Senior Member
 
Sep 2007
Default

For those that don't realise, darinp2 is probably the World authority on this subject, and I'd agree that six zeros contrast IS worth pursuing. I would probably be happy with five for now, but if six can be achieved from the first production example of a new technology, then I think we can wave a happy goodbye to years of disappointing digital displays that couod never turn the light source off completely.

There is a very flattering review of the new Pioneer in ultimateavmag.com, but ground-breaking though it is (about 5k on/off and 2600 ANSI), it's still a long way short of what prototype OLEDs have been achieving at recent shows and exhibitions.

Launch price aside, I think the only thing people will be able to complain about is how they just spent on old technology. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't welcome it with open arms and appreciate the real and worthwhile improvements it does bring. I was rooting for SED myself, but there you go. I just hope I got the blue laser disc thing right.....

Nick
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 08:10 PM   #9
HMtheJJ HMtheJJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Jun 2007
56
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu Tiger View Post
So will OLEDs be better than pioneer's new plasma technology? Anyone?


LCD and plasma is considered old tech comparing to OLED, so yes it is much better!!! also another reason why SONY's been using OLED display on their small sized MP3 Walkmans.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:23 PM   #10
Blu-ray Fanatic Blu-ray Fanatic is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Blu-ray Fanatic's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
San Antonio
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radagast View Post
Sony is bringing an OLED tv soon with 1,000,000 to 1 contrast ratio.

http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/News...x?NewsId=21516
Don't believe everything you hear or read. Samsung has tv's similar like that with 500,000:1 contrast ratio. Do not be deceived by the numbers. I asked someone who knew this stuff and said do not believe any of that. Stick to the tvs that have 18,000:1 or less
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:29 PM   #11
tron3 tron3 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
tron3's Avatar
 
Aug 2004
New Jersey
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-ray Fanatic View Post
Don't believe everything you hear or read. Samsung has tv's similar like that with 500,000:1 contrast ratio. Do not be deceived by the numbers. I asked someone who knew this stuff and said do not believe any of that. Stick to the tvs that have 18,000:1 or less
I don't see why we need THAT MUCH contrast that Sony claims. Doesn't too much contrast usually ruin the picture? OLED's being what they are, self lighting organic LED, I can see it having ultra high contrast. After all, the glow comes straight off the picture, not being passed through layers of LCD.

I'd like to see the picture in person. Must be phenominal.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:31 PM   #12
SS316SRV SS316SRV is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
SS316SRV's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Appleton, WI
74
Default

Contrast ratios are pretty fishy measures. Nobody has ever sat down and counted a contrast ratio. This technology will take a couple of years before it is fully accepted, just like the SXRD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:35 PM   #13
radagast radagast is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
radagast's Avatar
 
May 2007
Indianapolis
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tron3 View Post
I don't see why we need THAT MUCH contrast that Sony claims. Doesn't too much contrast usually ruin the picture?
Why would it ruin the picture? It would just mean that any material or programming that had less contrast would be reproduced accurately.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:44 PM   #14
Sonny Sonny is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Sonny's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
8
6
1
Default

11 inch screen
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 03:12 PM   #15
DezNutz DezNutz is offline
Expert Member
 
DezNutz's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
8
24
Default

It is a new technology, and Sony is being the pioneer again. This technology will replace both LCD and Plasmas within 6-8 years.

There is a couple problems with the new technology, one being they cannot mass produce a screen larger than 14" right now, and the other is the "limited" life span of the technology. Both of these will improve with years of development and use, hell LCD has similiar size restrictions when it was first introduced.

What I love about it, is that it is thin, uses less power, has wider viewing angles, and best picture quality best contrast rates ect...

I see this technology really growing in small portable electronics, think laptops, cell phones, even PSP's... as tehy are thinner screens than anything out there, and use less power while providing a better picture, perfect for portable electronics..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 04:59 PM   #16
Kristin Simard Kristin Simard is offline
Special Member
 
Kristin Simard's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny View Post
11 inch screen
That was my thought. All this fuss for an 11 inch screen!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 07:29 PM   #17
darinp2 darinp2 is offline
Expert Member
 
May 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tron3 View Post
I don't see why we need THAT MUCH contrast that Sony claims. Doesn't too much contrast usually ruin the picture?
High contrast ratio can bring out details that would be hard to see with lower CR displays, so with images that contain a lot of garbage that was left there because it wasn't seen, it could be bad thing. Much like mastering audio content on crappy speakers and then playing it on great speakers and hearing garbage that was left in. This is one of the reasons I want the content to me mastered as well as possible and for people encoding to use displays that show them the problems. As higher quality displays that can show more detail come out there will be more incentive to make sure the sources are up to par for them.

With a display that is capable of huge CR a person could set it up to lower if they wanted to.

Real life has a huge CR range.

--Darin
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:33 PM   #18
radagast radagast is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
radagast's Avatar
 
May 2007
Indianapolis
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-ray Fanatic View Post
Don't believe everything you hear or read. Samsung has tv's similar like that with 500,000:1 contrast ratio. Do not be deceived by the numbers. I asked someone who knew this stuff and said do not believe any of that. Stick to the tvs that have 18,000:1 or less
Well I remember reading a trade show report about SEDs being shown that also have a contrast ratio that high. The reporters said that it had the most amazing picture of ANY TV at the show. So I have to wonder why ANYONE would say stick to TVs of 18,000:1 or LESS. LESS??? You have to be kidding. 1000:1 is less. That would suck.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 03:16 AM   #19
HMtheJJ HMtheJJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Jun 2007
56
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-ray Fanatic View Post
Don't believe everything you hear or read. Samsung has tv's similar like that with 500,000:1 contrast ratio. Do not be deceived by the numbers. I asked someone who knew this stuff and said do not believe any of that. Stick to the tvs that have 18,000:1 or less


lol, whoever told u that.... blah!!!

i saw the TV at the SONY show and after speaking with SONY General Manager it's goin to be one AMAZING TV!!! i liked it but too small tho, i'll wait for a 70 inch or 200 hopefully one day since it's so light and thin.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 12:08 AM   #20
HMtheJJ HMtheJJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Jun 2007
56
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-ray Fanatic View Post
Don't believe everything you hear or read. Samsung has tv's similar like that with 500,000:1 contrast ratio. Do not be deceived by the numbers. I asked someone who knew this stuff and said do not believe any of that. Stick to the tvs that have 18,000:1 or less


and don't listen to those ppl who has no idea what they are talkin about!!!

I saw this TV at SONY Tokyo and the SONY show here in Vancouver, Amazing PQ, i'm not interested in it at this moment simply cuz of its size, but once SONY can make 52 up, i'll start buying regardless the price, This is for sure the next Gen after LCD, PQ can blow you away!!!
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Display Theory and Discussion

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Sony's 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio 27-inch OLED HDTV OLED TVs flabzilla 45 08-22-2009 10:06 AM
LG’s PQ60D TV with unbelievable 1,000,000,000:1 contrast ratio and 600HZ refresh rate Display Theory and Discussion HDTV1080P 6 01-21-2009 05:00 PM
Hitachi Boasts 8,000,000:1 Contrast Ratio Home Theater General Discussion J_UNTITLED 8 10-04-2007 04:39 PM
35,000:1 contrast ratio for the new Japan Sony VPL-VW60 Home Theater General Discussion HDTV1080P 15 09-09-2007 08:24 PM
New Sharp 120hz Lcd With 4ms And 15:000:1 Contrast Ratio Home Theater General Discussion HDTV1080P 4 06-01-2007 12:14 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:04 AM.