|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $16.05 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $40.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.95 53 min ago
| ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $22.49 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $22.49 13 min ago
| ![]() $29.49 | ![]() $29.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $5.29 5 hrs ago
|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Not sure what is scarier, 2000 years or 12mbps 4k |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Nov 2014
|
![]()
The math on that seems off considering 100 GB is the biggest UHD disc offered?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Feb 2015
jscoggins is blu-ray_girl_fan
|
![]()
12mbps? yikes
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
The raison d'etre for the original M-Disc was that CD-R and DVD-R used organic dyes which degrade over short periods of time, especially in the presence of UV light.
BD-R HTL use an inorganic metallic layer which is entirely different from the old organic dyes. They're extremely stable over time. There is a reason why M-Disc BD-Rs or BD-XLs can be burned in a standard burner. They're note hugely different and their talk of a 'rock like layer' or creating physical pits on the disc is purely creative marketing. Not to mention 2000 years is a very crude mathematical extrapolation based on the error rates in the study. They've done nothing to address the longevity of the actual discs themselves. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Oct 2007
|
![]()
The math in that article is very wrong. A bit rate of 12 Megabits per second with a runtime of 80 minutes only adds up to 7.2 GB.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Active Member
|
![]()
As nobody will be around to prove it right or wrong, i've just invented a blu ray disc that will last 20 million years. Give or take a decade.
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Esteban BD (02-20-2015) |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
2000 years is insanely dubious. Yet I'm sure there are plenty of DVD discs still good that are going on 20 years. Pretty much my entire CD collection still seems good after 20+ years. Even by current standards, pushing it out to 40 or 50 as a lifespan is perfectly believable - and if they developed some "ultra-long lifespan" disc that goes 100 years I might believe it. Just not 2000, that is far too long to comprehend (and pointless, really, save for hardcore/permanent archiving purposes). Regardless of the theoretical lifespan, manufacturing defects and random failures will always undermine a certain % of discs. There is no such thing as a fault-free manufacturing process. For that reason no archivists would ever just count on their 1 disc, they would have multiple copies and probably multiple different storage mediums. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|