|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best iTunes Music Deals
|
Best iTunes Music Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $6.99 | ![]() $6.99 | ![]() $6.99 | ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $19.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Expert Member
Nov 2011
England
|
![]()
Every article i read about ARC boasts that it's better than optical because you only need one cable.
Right now my setup is: Bluray player connected to TV via HDMI. TV connected to soundbar via optical. I don't see how ARC uses less cables than this....it uses the same amount of cables...or am i missing something? |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Champion
Sep 2013
UK
|
![]()
Likewise ARC can only do lossless 2.0 PCM, the rest lossy. So it doesn't actually made any quality difference.
What ARC does is allow a more seamless integration between the TV and the soundbar, such as the soundbar turning itself on with the TV, and vice versa. eARC is the one that does lossless, and both the TV and soundbar need to be compatible with it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
![]() Feb 2020
-
-
-
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|