As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
3 hrs ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
11 hrs ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
13 hrs ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
17 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Death Line 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
3 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
9 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Signs 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.00
3 hrs ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
 
Bloodstained Italy (Blu-ray)
$42.99
5 hrs ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Audio > Speakers
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2009, 10:53 PM   #1
lakingshockey lakingshockey is offline
Active Member
 
lakingshockey's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
9
164
12
Default Energy C-300s vs. Polk Monitor 50 vs. Polk T90e

Hi guys, I have a couple quick questions. regarding tower speakers. I'm looking to buy a pair of tower speakers to start off my home theater. The three models that i'm considering are:

Energy C-300 - ~$260 for a pair
Polk Monitor 50s - ~$180 for a pair
Polk T90e - ~$260 for a pair

From what i've read, the Polk T90e's are basically the European versions of the Monitor 60s.

Anyways, I'm looking for some advice? The monitor 50s would be a lot more budget friendly. Are the T90e's and the C-300 worth the extra money?

Also, my dad is giving me a center channel for free. Its an NHT VS 1.4. Would this be tambour matched to any of these floorstanding speakers. Here's a link to the specs for the NHT:

http://reviews.cnet.com/separate-spe...?tag=mncol;lst

For reference, I'm planning on getting either a Marantz 4002 or Onkyo 606 receiver to go with them. Thanks in advance for your help.

Last edited by lakingshockey; 01-23-2009 at 11:05 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 11:08 PM   #2
ozzman ozzman is offline
Power Member
 
ozzman's Avatar
 
May 2008
St. Catharines ONT
37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lakingshockey View Post
Hi guys, I have a couple quick questions. regarding tower speakers. I'm looking to buy a pair of tower speakers to start off my home theater. The three models that i'm considering are:

Energy C-300 - ~$260 for a pair
Polk Monitor 50s - ~$180 for a pair
Polk T90e - ~$260 for a pair

From what i've read, the Polk T90e's are basically the European versions of the Monitor 60s.

Anyways, I'm looking for some advice? The monitor 50s would be a lot more budget friendly. Are the T90e's and the C-300 worth the extra money?

For reference, I'm planning on getting either a Marantz 4002 or Onkyo 606 receiver to go with them. Thanks in advance for your help.
On paper,It looks like Polk is the winner But i will say,Personally i would go with Energy.I think there better made and better quality.Remember specs aint everthing.Go try to listen to both the speakers.

also Remember this is just my opinion and what i would grab between the 3 you have listed.I have owned Energy and keep them in high regard

http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=ENC300

http://www.polkaudio.com/homeaudio/specs/t90e/

Last edited by ozzman; 01-23-2009 at 11:11 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 11:31 PM   #3
lakingshockey lakingshockey is offline
Active Member
 
lakingshockey's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
9
164
12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzman View Post
On paper,It looks like Polk is the winner But i will say,Personally i would go with Energy.I think there better made and better quality.Remember specs aint everthing.Go try to listen to both the speakers.

also Remember this is just my opinion and what i would grab between the 3 you have listed.I have owned Energy and keep them in high regard

http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=ENC300

http://www.polkaudio.com/homeaudio/specs/t90e/
Thanks for your reply Ozzman. I'd love to audition the speakers but there are no audio stores around where I live that carry any of these speakers (or any good speakers for that matter).
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 11:39 PM   #4
ozzman ozzman is offline
Power Member
 
ozzman's Avatar
 
May 2008
St. Catharines ONT
37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lakingshockey View Post
Thanks for your reply Ozzman. I'd love to audition the speakers but there are no audio stores around where I live that carry any of these speakers (or any good speakers for that matter).
Ahhh, Man That sucks
It so hard to just take opinions and go with it, instead of just listening for yourself.
I hope you get more replys and you can weight it out

Well You have one Vote For Energy

Last edited by ozzman; 01-23-2009 at 11:50 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 11:42 PM   #5
Audiophile_At_Birth Audiophile_At_Birth is offline
Special Member
 
Audiophile_At_Birth's Avatar
 
Nov 2008
El Paso, TX
31
8
235
1
Default

Heard the polks... They sound good, but I opted for the monitor 70s instead because they offered better bass response. Haven't heard the engery ones, but like Ozz said, trust your ears. However that's not the case with you. I'll will tell you this. The polk T-90s have the better specs of the three...BUT those compared to the Monitor 50s...

Let me start out by saying I had monitor 50s as fronts and was impressed with them. Obviously anything is better than the HTiB speakers I had. Then my dad said you could always use those as surrounds when you upgrade to larger towers. He had a good point, and I'm tight on space so I opted for Monitor 40s which I used as fronts until I got my M70s and now I use the 40s as surrounds. The Monitor 60s or T-90s compared to the 50s in your case, the Monitor 60s sounded so much more clear and better than the Monitor 50s when I auditioned them. I think it is worth the extra dough if money isn't an issue. The M60s (T-90s) are great for movies and music and I think you would get more out of them than the 50s.

You'll want a good sub eventually though as the T-90s will lack in bass
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 11:51 PM   #6
lakingshockey lakingshockey is offline
Active Member
 
lakingshockey's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
9
164
12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Audiophile_At_Birth View Post
Heard the polks... They sound good, but I opted for the monitor 70s instead because they offered better bass response. Haven't heard the engery ones, but like Ozz said, trust your ears. However that's not the case with you. I'll will tell you this. The polk T-90s have the better specs of the three...BUT those compared to the Monitor 50s...

Let me start out by saying I had monitor 50s as fronts and was impressed with them. Obviously anything is better than the HTiB speakers I had. Then my dad said you could always use those as surrounds when you upgrade to larger towers. He had a good point, and I'm tight on space so I opted for Monitor 40s which I used as fronts until I got my M70s and now I use the 40s as surrounds. The Monitor 60s or T-90s compared to the 50s in your case, the Monitor 60s sounded so much more clear and better than the Monitor 50s when I auditioned them. I think it is worth the extra dough if money isn't an issue. The M60s (T-90s) are great for movies and music and I think you would get more out of them than the 50s.

You'll want a good sub eventually though as the T-90s will lack in bass
Thanks for your reply. I'm planning on adding a subwoofer a little later. I currently live in a dorm, so I'm trying to stay conservative

I think i'm between the T90s and the C-300s. I just can't make a decision! Knowing my luck, both of them will be out of stock by the time i decide.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 11:59 PM   #7
lakingshockey lakingshockey is offline
Active Member
 
lakingshockey's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
9
164
12
Default

hmmm. i just found the c-300s in black (which would asthetically work better with my setup than cherry) for $250 shipped. I think I might be ready to go for it. Any other suggestions?!?!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2009, 12:29 AM   #8
Audiophile_At_Birth Audiophile_At_Birth is offline
Special Member
 
Audiophile_At_Birth's Avatar
 
Nov 2008
El Paso, TX
31
8
235
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lakingshockey View Post
Thanks for your reply. I'm planning on adding a subwoofer a little later. I currently live in a dorm, so I'm trying to stay conservative

I think i'm between the T90s and the C-300s. I just can't make a decision! Knowing my luck, both of them will be out of stock by the time i decide.
You should buy the biggest loudest Sub, and at nine in the morning when everyone is hung over from the night before, you should play some heavy bass songs...That's sure to make you a popular guy around campus.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Audio > Speakers

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Polk Monitor 60's vs. Polk T90e's Speakers redlikefire02 29 03-13-2009 03:45 PM
Any difference between Polk T90e and Monitor 60's? Speakers Footloose301 7 02-17-2009 02:14 AM
Polk T90e Speakers RandDawg 0 01-15-2009 01:44 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 PM.