As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 hr ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
16 hrs ago
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
3 hrs ago
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
17 hrs ago
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


View Poll Results: Would you pay $5-$10 more for a Warner or Paramount Super bit 50GB disc?
Yes willing to pay more for the best possible picture and sound that an entire 50GB disc can hold. 57 78.08%
No I am happy with the Warner and Paramount quality now and would not pay more for better quality. 16 21.92%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2007, 04:06 AM   #1
HDTV1080P HDTV1080P is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Jan 2007
205
Default Would you pay $5-$10 more for a Warner or Paramount Super bit 50GB disc?

Hopefully one day Warner and Paramount will maximize 1080P transfers with 4K scans and offer BLU-RAY owners discs with high bit rate MPEG-4/AVC or VC-1 that fills the entire 50GB disc up. Then the picture and sound quality will be much better compared to the HD-DVD format.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 04:12 AM   #2
KenThompson KenThompson is offline
Power Member
 
KenThompson's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
B.C. Canada
Default

The better picture was what HD was suppose to be about. Bought best tv and player, just need the movies. There would have to be an improvement in overall pq to justify the extra $ but willing to buy if its there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 04:53 AM   #3
dmxoneiuv dmxoneiuv is offline
Active Member
 
May 2007
12
465
21
20
Arrow why pay more? its never enough is it

i dont think we should have to pay any more than we already are for them to use up the full disc, but at the same time, u know most of us from the forums are willing. whats the max amount you'd pay for a 1 disc blu-ray movie...i think i mightve bought a few at $39.99 when i first bought my ps3 at bestbuy so i could get a few movies to go along. i bought planet earth thru the warner bro.'s website with that promo deal, but even retail, i'd say its worth $99.99!
ah, enough rambling
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 06:59 AM   #4
jbuttler007 jbuttler007 is offline
Active Member
 
Mar 2007
Ayase-Shi, Japan
Default

Not me, since hi def will be the norm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 04:21 PM   #5
Blu Tiger Blu Tiger is offline
Special Member
 
Blu Tiger's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Denver, CO
725
27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KenThompson View Post
Bought best tv and player
What tv would that be? I would pay extra for the best quaility. I shouldn't have to though.

Last edited by Blu Tiger; 06-06-2007 at 04:25 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 08:02 PM   #6
HDTV1080P HDTV1080P is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Jan 2007
205
Default

Currently so far what this poll has shown is that over 75% of movie collectors that voted would be willing to pay an extra $5-$10 for movies from Warner and Paramount that had the extra touch of quality that the HD-DVD format can not offer. We can only hope one day that Warner and Paramount fills up the 50GB discs with the highest bit rate possible for picture and sound quality. Having 5.1-7.1 PCM sound tracks with high bit rate MPEG-4/AVC or VC-1 has a market.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 08:24 PM   #7
donricouga donricouga is offline
Senior Member
 
donricouga's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Atlanta, GA
138
9
1
Send a message via Yahoo to donricouga
Default

I would pay but these superbit discs should be the norm. I would be very upset if I had to pay $30-$40 anytime i wanted a movie
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2007, 03:47 PM   #8
bluflu bluflu is offline
Special Member
 
bluflu's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Default Here's an idea

How about we all chip-in $5 to $10 and buy Universal and Warner.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2007, 03:36 PM   #9
MasterXeus MasterXeus is offline
Power Member
 
Mar 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTV1080P View Post
[SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times New Roman] Currently so far what this poll has shown is that over 75% of movie collectors that voted would be willing to pay an extra $5-$10 for movies from Warner and Paramount that had the extra touch of quality that the HD-DVD format can not offer.
I'm not going to vote, I don't this is a very good poll. This poll needs at least one more option.

Option 3 No, I'm not willing to pay more, but want the best possible picture and sound that an entire 50 GB Disc can hold.

I'm sure the % would be different if this option was added.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 09:10 AM   #10
Canada Canada is online now
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Canada's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Victoria, BC
17
305
1201
37
42
Default

I would not pay for a superbit Blu-Ray they use enough space on the 50 Gigs to get great picture and sound, although 25 gigs is another story. The only way I would update a previous Blu-Ray Title was if it had better audio codecs or newer video codecs.

Last edited by Canada; 06-26-2007 at 02:46 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 09:38 AM   #11
HDJK HDJK is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
HDJK's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
Switzerland
2
Default

There is a third option missing: I would not pay more for a superbit edition because if Warner got it right, there would be no need for a SBE
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 10:06 AM   #12
degas degas is online now
Senior Member
 
Jan 2007
1317
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HDJK View Post
There is a third option missing: I would not pay more for a superbit edition because if Warner got it right, there would be no need for a SBE
Exactly!
If anything it should be cheaper, since they don't have to put in work for the IME/extras stuff.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 10:40 AM   #13
The Don The Don is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Apr 2006
12
2
Default

the idea of blu-ray is that it is clearly superior to the DVD SB version....but it also includes the extras....the one thing that SB HAS TO exclude..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 11:20 AM   #14
dobyblue dobyblue is offline
Super Moderator
 
dobyblue's Avatar
 
Jul 2006
Ontario, Canada
71
55
655
15
Default

Whomever is doing BVHE's VC-1 encodings, that's who I wish was doing Warner's.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 12:58 PM   #15
JTK JTK is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
JTK's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HDJK View Post
There is a third option missing: I would not pay more for a superbit edition because if Warner got it right, there would be no need for a SBE
Bingo! I shouldn't have to pay more for what the product was supposed to be in the first place.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 01:13 PM   #16
MatrixS2000 MatrixS2000 is offline
Power Member
 
MatrixS2000's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Toronto, Canada
48
305
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HDJK View Post
There is a third option missing: I would not pay more for a superbit edition because if Warner got it right, there would be no need for a SBE
I agree - why would I pay more for them to do the job properly?

Other studios are doing it properly at the same price - so I will just support them until WB/Paramount clues in....
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 01:16 PM   #17
Shin-Ra Shin-Ra is offline
Super Moderator
 
Shin-Ra's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
5
1
Default

Same price, use the full 50GB.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 02:22 PM   #18
BLu-Balls BLu-Balls is offline
Expert Member
 
BLu-Balls's Avatar
 
Dec 2006
TO Canada
867
1
10
Default

I would rather sacrifice the shitty special features that saturate the disc before giving the studios another bleeding cent for hi-def. We already are paying a premium.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Paramount website has removed the HD-DVD bit Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Chevypower 11 03-04-2008 09:56 PM
Warner no pay off to go Blu! Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology splax23 16 01-05-2008 03:51 AM
what if Microsoft pay warner to stay red? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology yellowblanket 29 12-14-2007 08:49 AM
Microsoft: We Didn't Pay Paramount for HD DVD Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology HDTV1080P 20 08-29-2007 07:40 PM
How much would you pay to have Transformers and other Paramount films on blu-ray now? Blu-ray Movies - North America tron3 53 08-29-2007 03:42 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:37 AM.