Second Gen iPod Touch and 4th Gen Nano Announced

[Hamburglar]

http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/08/09...en.ipod.touch/

http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/08/09...g.and.classic/

Not much has changed and nothing press worthy but a nice added touch.

[jamclaur]

I saw that this morning. The new nano is looking good. But i'm waiting to see what the new 160+gb classic can do.

[pacificvibes]

I wish they would make a bigger iPod Touch, maybe around 100 GB's. I have the 160 GB. I practically use it has a external hard drive. But yeah make a bigger iPod Touch Apple !!!!

[quexos]

Originally Posted by pacificvibes

I wish they would make a bigger iPod Touch, maybe around 100 GB's. I have the 160 GB. I practically use it has a external hard drive. But yeah make a bigger iPod Touch Apple !!!!

What are you talking about there is no 160GB Ipod Touch. I got the 32GB Ipod Touch and it's the biggest memory available, or has this stuff been overtaken so fast ?

[jamclaur]

Originally Posted by quexos

What are you talking about there is no 160GB Ipod Touch. I got the 32GB Ipod Touch and it's the biggest memory available, or has this stuff been overtaken so fast ?

he said he wished...

[BStecke]

Originally Posted by quexos

What are you talking about there is no 160GB Ipod Touch. I got the 32GB Ipod Touch and it's the biggest memory available, or has this stuff been overtaken so fast ?

Pretty sure he's talking about a 160gb Classic.

Here's a question for current iPod users. Do you guys store your iTunes library on your computer hard drive? I'm thinking of storing everything on an external, but that's kind of a pain when your want to sync everything. I just need to upgrade my hard drive.

[Forrestandjen07]

when that price drop happens, im in

[BStecke]

Originally Posted by Forrestandjen07

ipod touch is a joke

i mean you are insane if you buy a touch 32gig, $500?????????????????


you could get two Zune 80gigs for that price

only thing apealing about the touch is the touch screen

Can't do web browsing/apps on the Zune though. Different strokes.

[Forrestandjen07]

$499 to 399?

are they mad

you could get a ps3, or 360 for that price, i would love a touch screen mp3 player, but DAMN

[Forrestandjen07]

Originally Posted by BStecke

Can't do web browsing/apps on the Zune though. Different strokes.

yea, i wrote what i was thinking and not what wanted to say there lol


but seriously Tho, those prices are mad

[Footloose301]

Originally Posted by Forrestandjen07

$499 to 399?

are they mad

you could get a ps3, or 360 for that price, i would love a touch screen mp3 player, but DAMN

Its not just a touch screen mp3. You need to realize that it has Safari, Maps, and other neat stuff like the Apps Store which has some killer games like Crash Bandicot that I have on my iPhone 3G.

If you only want an mp3 player then go with the regular iPod or get a Zune, or a cheap mp3 player. Fact of the matter is the price can be justified with the features it has. Its nearly a pocket computer and you don't need an AT&T contract, thus the cost of the iPod Touch.

Your PS3 and/or Xbox 360 would look kind of silly sticking out of your pocket walking down the street.

[Forrestandjen07]

Originally Posted by Footloose301

Its not just a touch screen mp3. You need to realize that it has Safari, Maps, and other neat stuff like the Apps Store which has some killer games like Crash Bandicot that I have on my iPhone 3G.

If you only want an mp3 player then go with the regular iPod or get a Zune, or a cheap mp3 player. Fact of the matter is the price can be justified with the features it has. Its nearly a pocket computer and you don't need an AT&T contract, thus the cost of the iPod Touch.

Your PS3 and/or Xbox 360 would look kind of silly sticking out of your pocket walking down the street.

Yea,

But i just cant justify that price. so it has some nifty features, but $400 for a mp3 player with only 32gigs of space???????????

Regardles of what extras it may have, i just dont see how you can justify that price for so little bit of space.

[BStecke]

Originally Posted by Forrestandjen07

Yea,

But i just cant justify that price. so it has some nifty features, but $400 for a mp3 player with only 32gigs of space???????????

Regardles of what extras it may have, i just dont see how you can justify that price for so little bit of space.

Like I said, different strokes. I use about half a gig of the 8 gb I have in my iPhone. It's everything else that makes it worth it.

[LORDs_angellos]

Originally Posted by jamclaur

I saw that this morning. The new nano is looking good. But i'm waiting to see what the new 160+gb classic can do.

Same here. I hope it's not just a consolidation of the 80GB and 160GB models into one 120GB model. It'd better have some new features or I'm not gonna consider buying it. Even so, I'd rather wait for the 80GB iPod Touch.

[xtop]

Originally Posted by LORDs_angellos

Same here. I hope it's not just a consolidation of the 80GB and 160GB models into one 120GB model. It'd better have some new features or I"m not buying it. I'll wait for the 80GB iPod Touch.

64gb touch you mean. not happening this year tho.

the touch is uber cool, still a bit too expensive for me to make the jump tho. be nice if apple added radio

[Forrestandjen07]

Originally Posted by BStecke

Like I said, different strokes. I use about half a gig of the 8 gb I have in my iPhone. It's everything else that makes it worth it.

if you say so

[Oddiophile]

Originally Posted by Forrestandjen07

But i just cant justify that price. so it has some nifty features, but $400 for a mp3 player with only 32gigs of space???????????

If i'm not mistaken the Zune is still using a typical hardrive with spinning platters like the ipod classic, where the ipod touch is using solid state memory just like the iphone.

[Forrestandjen07]

Originally Posted by Oddiophile

If i'm not mistaken the Zune is still using a typical hardrive with spinning platters like the ipod classic, where the ipod touch is using solid state memory just like the iphone.

Maybe, i dont know

But it works great , i got the 80gig for $250 never had a single problem with it

Although the Itunes store is way more advanced than the crappy zune store

i would prefer more space over fancy featuers

[xtop]

Originally Posted by Oddiophile

If i'm not mistaken the Zune is still using a typical hardrive with spinning platters like the ipod classic, where the ipod touch is using solid state memory just like the iphone.

yup, microsoft doesn't have an answer to the touch yet. so you've gotta compare apples to apples

[Forrestandjen07]

Originally Posted by xtop

apples to apples

lol