|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $33.49 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $11.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.33 | ![]() $35.99 15 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
May 2007
|
![]()
I want to add another blu-ray player to the living room and I am currently considering the following:
Pioneer BDP-05FD Sony BDP-S550 PS3 Out of the 3 which would you take in terms of PQ. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
The new Panasonic 55 and 35's have the best PQ of any standalone, but the PS3 is equal to that, according to CNET's review. http://reviews.cnet.com/video-player...?tag=mncol;lst
In short- if you are looking for a new SA, the Panasonic has excellent PQ, but if you have a PS3 you aren't missing anything. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
yeah, i don't know about PQ, but I would say that the newer stand alones will be more flexible like the PS3, given that they will have ethernet ports and can get firmware updates just a easily as the PS3. With the ablility to decode and bitstream HD audio and most have 5.1 to 7.1 analogs outs for people with non-HDMI AVR's, this gives the SA more flexiblilty then the PS3.
PQ, I would want to see some test or a link, Like Aramis stated. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I have the Sony PS3 and a Pioneer BDP-05FD. The Pioneer has a noticeably sharper image than the Sony PS3 (I am using a 100" screen with a JVC RS-1 front projector). If you are planning to use the Pioneer to play audio CDs, you will be pleasantly surprised as the Wolfson DACs used in the Pioneer is killer...
BUT the Pioneer has teething issues (I am using firmware 1.07). 1. it is quite slow in loading, slower than current generation players 2. it is missing internal DTS HD Master decoding 3. layer changing in SD-DVD is abysmal... taking up to three seconds 4. scanning forward and pressing play at a scene does NOT always end you at the scene. 5. HDMI occasionally drops audio when skipping chapters 6. some control issues with SD-DVDs 7. terribly designed remote control 8. player goes into standby mode too quickly... 10-15 seconds the PS3... 1. softer image 2. no analog output 3. bluetooth remote control 4. noisy 5. very quick load times 6. fast response time 7. least problems with compatibility 8. profile 2.0 ready 9. energy hog |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
May 2007
|
![]()
Thanks for your input, I ended up buying the Pioneer.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Pioneer BDP-05FD vs BDP-23FD | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | underglobe | 0 | 09-05-2009 02:30 AM |
Pioneer BDP-05FD & BDP-51FD Thread | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | bluewatergrigsby | 34 | 09-01-2008 04:24 PM |
Sony Bdp-s350 And Bdp-s550 (twice Info Article) | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | HDTV1080P | 7 | 07-19-2008 12:50 PM |
Sony announces players BDP-S350 and BDP-S550 | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | Grubert | 32 | 02-27-2008 03:43 AM |
|
|