|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 3D Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $14.99 | ![]() $18.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $11.99 | ![]() $9.55 | ![]() $18.15 | ![]() $9.55 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $9.37 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Well, it's official LG dropped 3D from all of it's 2017 TVs:
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/lg-3d-201701044397.htm I thought they saw the light. They would have been unique to keep it as it's been said that the cost for them using passive filters is minimal. My stomach dropped a bit as I'm a big 3D fan and have been since 2010 and before. Last edited by Jbug; 01-04-2017 at 05:00 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Sad...
Hopefully Sony will stick to 3D with their 2017 and beyond models. I don't know what these manufacturers are thinking: "Oh, lots of people still watch 3D with their large collection of 3D Blu-rays but our TVs don't support 3D. It doesn't cost that much more but our TVs still don't support 3D. The Force Awakens 3D and Rogue One 3D you say? Hmm...nope, our TVs will not support 3D" Last edited by DJR662; 01-04-2017 at 05:07 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I hope they continue with the OLED TVs they are supposed to be showing at 2017 CES. Passive and OLED are a marriage that should not be broken up. I know LG has their reasons but this is bad news for 3D lovers.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | ilovenola2 (01-05-2017) |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]()
well this sucks, Samsung, now LG, who's next.
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | ilovenola2 (01-05-2017) |
![]() |
#7 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.avsforum.com/lg-oled-tvs-at-ces-2017/ |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Moderator
|
![]()
Sony probably...
This news makes me sick to my stomach. I can understand dumping curved screens, but passive 3D that costs nothing and everyone says looks amazing? Sounds like a stitch-up of some kind. It's a year or two before I need to upgrade but I guess I'll just have to buy one for my mother or something... Last edited by the13thman; 01-04-2017 at 06:07 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | ilovenola2 (01-05-2017), levcore (01-05-2017) |
![]() |
#11 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Hopefully my lg3d tv doesnt go bad.... Its crazy how they leaving folk hanging
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | ilovenola2 (01-05-2017) |
![]() |
#13 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Its no use trying to keep up with every new feature. They will **** the consumer over for money as always. Im still pissed I got my lg 4k tv in 2014 now that hdr is out and it doens have it. With that said I have a great passive 3d picture that now folk wont have. So Ima appreciate that andjust get a 4k oled with hdr anddolby vision later.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Oct 2011
|
![]()
Sharp still offers 3D if I'm not mistaken. On their Aquos line... although I believe its active 3D
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | bud_brigman (01-04-2017) |
![]() |
#19 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Wow, this is one of those times I hate when I'm right. I saw the writing on the wall and picked up a 65UH8500 this year even though I could barely afford it.
After Samsung ditched 3D I knew I'd better go ahead and get one if I wanted a TV that does both 4K and 3D. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | ilovenola2 (01-05-2017) |
![]() |
#20 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|