|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best iTunes Movie Deals
|
Best iTunes Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $12.99 | ![]() $12.99 | ![]() $12.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $7.99 | ![]() $14.97 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $19.99 | ![]() $4.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Looks like Lionsgate is for sale current bidders.
amazon, CBS and Verizon. I guess if amazon buys them we will get Lionsgate stuff in MA. If CBS buys I assume UV will continue and if Verizon wins who the hell knows. http://deadline.com/2018/01/lionsgat...om-1202244991/ |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | danfindlay (01-18-2018), etmassey (01-18-2018), flyry (01-19-2018), gabby98 (01-18-2018), jmb1381 (01-18-2018), master gandhi (01-19-2018), plateoshrimp (01-18-2018), Reggie Hammond (01-19-2018), SlayersCouncil (01-18-2018), Undeadcow (01-18-2018), UVZombie (01-18-2018) |
![]() |
#2 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
All of of the other movies Amazon studios puts out are by smaller studios so that's why they're not MA. But this is all beside the point ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Special Member
|
![]()
All i was saying is that being Amazon does not equal MA. I don't see how that is proving his point. Nothing that Amazon has put out at this point is MA. Lions Gate is not MA. Amazon plus Lions Gate does automatically = MA. At this point it looks to be the opposite. I think they will eventually come around (same with paramount and MGM), but I fail to see the connection with Amazon buying lions gate and it magically becoming MA. I think we are just going to have to disagree on this point.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
I don't know why you're bringing up their studio output which at this point have all been under smaller studios. UV is dying quickly so Lionsgate Paramount and MGM going MA seems inevitable. Last edited by flyry; 01-19-2018 at 04:50 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Yes. Amazon Studios uses a variety of distributors. By order of use: Sony, Lionsgate, Broad Green Pictures, PBS, and Universal. They don't distribute anything themselves. I don't see how buying Lionsgate would make it more likely they would join MA.
If UV failed because retailers didn't want to bear the costs and MA rectified that by putting the burden on the studios, enabling MA for Lionsgate might bring costs that Amazon wants to avoid. It could actually prevent Lionsgate from joining MA. Right now Lionsgate is in the business of selling movies. If they're bought by Amazon, they become in the business of building up Amazon Prime Video. Why encourage people to watch all that sweet Lionsgate content at other providers? It's going to come down to Amazon's motives and we don't know them. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
If they followed your line of thinking then would they really have joined MA at all? In the grand scheme of things Lionsgate has a C level catalog. True it may not make it more likely they join MA but it's fun to play along. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Presumably Amazon wants the Lionsgate catalog to beef up their Prime Video selection. The same way Disney wants Fox's catalog. How would joining MA help that cause?
Let's say being part of a locker system is a 25 cent expense per entitlement to insert, maintain, etc. Someone has to pay that. UV tried to split the bill between studio and retailer 50-50 and that failed. I'm presuming MA is absorbing the lion's share of that 25 cent expense now, and those costs are carried by the studios. Amazon, as a retailer, joined MA because it didn't cost much and through better marketing they could gain more customers than they lose. Amazon, as a studio, would now have to pay for millions of entitlements to be MA enabled. They didn't join UV because they didn't want to pay. How does paying even more per title gain them more customers? For either EST or Prime Video? I'm not saying Amazon wouldn't join MA if they bought Lionsgate. But I don't see why Lionsgate would be more likely to join MA if bought by Amazon, and it's potentially less likely because of costs involved that don't further their presumed goal of building up Prime Video. I think the best scenario is if Lionsgate is already in the process of joining MA so it won't get nixed by Amazon. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|