|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $44.99 | ![]() $27.13 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $27.57 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 47 min ago
| ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $30.50 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 |
![]() |
#1 | ||
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
Walt Disney has announced that beginning next month they plan on offering different discs for the rental outlets and retail venues. This announcement comes on the heels of 20th Century Fox and their plan to curb lost sales to the sale of previously viewed titles. Disney will begin in June with the release of Morning Light, Confessions of a Shopaholicand Jonas Brothers: The Concert Experiencewill be released in premium versions with value-added material for the retail market and bare-bones offerings for rental, according to retail and distribution executives.
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Link |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
My Hastings store has recently done this with the Fox Blu-ray releases of The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008), Bride Wars, Marley & Me, and Notorious. They all have the words "Rental Exclusive" either on the top or bottom of the cover artwork. Still, this is no surprise for me either.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
May 2009
|
![]()
What's the point?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Jedi
|
![]()
Well the point is some people just want the movie...kind of. Makes sense to release movie-only copies to rental stores so they don't have to pay as much. Then if someone wants stuff besides JUST the movie, they can buy a copy of it.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
May 2009
|
![]()
The reason the studios are starting to do this is because they want to push the versions for sale and not make the used rental copies an attractive cheaper alternative. They feel that people will see the rental copies as stripped down versions and will opt to spend the extra money and get the "good" version. I don't think it will have much impact as some people just want to pay less for their copies and used copies offer an affordable alternative. Most that buy used rentals will just deal without the features while true movies fans and buffs will buy the new full featured versions when they come out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
|
![]()
I personally think having a "stripped down" version is a good idea. Most of the people I know don't watch as many movies as I do. Well, let's be honest, no one I know watches as many movies as I do. But, my point is that most people don't watch the extras. Only people like us, people that spend time on forums discussing movies truly care about extras. I am not saying that only people on forums care about extras, but you see where I am going with this. John Q and Jane Q public can't tell the difference between Blu-ray and DVD or VHS for that matter. So, they won't care that the movie they rent or purchase doesn't have the extras.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
This is normal here in Norway as well. Has been done ever since the VHS era. The reason is that it's illegal to rent retail-versions.
A rental outlet has to pay 4-5 times the price of a retail version. If there was no markings on the cover, rental outlets would instead just buy a retail version from across the street. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
It serves two purposes. First is to prevent piracy. There are too many people out there who rent DVDs (and now Blu-rays) and rip the entire disc. The technology is out there to make perfect copies, so they save money, though break the law.
The second is to increase title sales. Renting no longer will yield an extras packed edition, so if you really want the extras, you have to buy it. I wouldn't expect it to become common practice to see these versions show up on store shelves. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]() Quote:
2. Yeah, it's an incentive to not buy the rental copies. I know it will be annoyance to some, but I realized over time that I never watch Special features anyways so as long as they don't compromise AQ/PQ it won't make a difference. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Active Member
|
![]()
While it is theoretically possible that more space could be allotted to a main feature if space isn't being used for special features, but I doubt any time would be wasted / money spent on making a higher bitrate transfer for a rental title.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
^Now that would be a great idea!
Yep, I would imagine they just copy and paste the movie-only files onto another disc. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
US versions vs Canadian versions = the same? | Blu-ray Movies - North America | substance | 5 | 03-02-2010 07:59 PM |
Amazon.co.uk B1G1 Disney offer | Region B Deals | tom pain | 10 | 10-16-2009 08:18 PM |
Star wars theatrical versions vs the Revised versions | Movies | sowecrazy | 43 | 05-29-2008 02:29 PM |
Disney Blu-ray offer..? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Viiincent | 2 | 10-13-2007 07:57 AM |
|
|