|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $30.49 | ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
|
![]()
Megan Fox replacing Sarah Michelle Gellar as Buffy?
Source : http://thesuperficial.com/2009/06/me...sarah_mich.php Your thoughts ? Last edited by Jellybeans; 06-12-2009 at 01:56 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Ugh. I'm a huge Buffy fan (hence the SMG icon). As most die hard cult fans, who are, afterall, responsible for the sheer success of the television show (the movie tanked, obviously), I'm not very keen on a 'remake.' Maybe 20 years from now, but it's still too soon.
I actually kind of like Megan Fox because she seems actually intelligent in interviews (more than just a pretty face) and she has a wicked sense of humor, but if she accepts an offer to play Buffy, I will do what Megatron failed to do! |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I have doubts that this will be successfull; without SMG and without Josh Whedon. The show had a huge cult following for a reason and that was it's success. Changing the formula is not going to work.
I like the idea of Megan Fox being a vampire slayer and maybe in the same universe as Buffy but to be Buffy...? I'll say maybe and wait for more details. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I see her on IMDb.com's news section a lot. She's sitting on a really high horse when she talks about a lot of other celebs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Blu-ray Knight
Jun 2007
|
![]()
Isn't that for a movie?
If that's the case, she wouldn't be replacing Sarah Michelle Gellar... she'd be replacing Kristy Swanson. Logan |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Obviously, if they were to announce this 20 years in the future, I wouldn't really have much of a problem with it. But the tv show ended in 2003, and technically both Whedon and Gellar could still sign off on a movie version if both could agree to return. Sarah didn't originate Buffy but to millions of fans, she IS the definitive Buffy. The Kuzuis have been very greedy. They were listed as executive producers of the television series despite not ever having worked on it. I'm sure they get a percentage of the dvd/merchandising/syndication cut but apparently it isn't enough. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Exactly. Simply call it 'The Slayer' and keep it in the same Buffyverse timeline yet focus on a different Slayer. But they want to cash in on the Buffy name somehow thinking that the rabid fanbase is going to really love a movie with the Buffy character yet no Willow, Xander, Giles, or any of the rest of the support ensemble cast that made the show so great and leagues above the original movie.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Sarah Michelle Gellar | Blu-ray Movies - North America | nothing.sound | 22 | 12-30-2009 06:10 AM |
Sarah Michelle Gellar fans | General Chat | PCiAM | 10 | 04-14-2009 05:51 PM |
|
|