|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $67.11 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.37 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.00 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.32 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $37.99 | ![]() $27.54 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $29.96 |
![]() |
#61 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I've read some reviews of the VS disc and the 88 disc (from different sites/reviewers so ofc take that with a huge grain of salt), but the reviews of the VS disc mentioned deep blacks while a review of the 88 mentioned some raised gamma and lower contrast in the darker scenes. Anyone who's seen both disc able to confirm?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
Are you referring to this review? https://www.avforums.com/reviews/mur...-review.22811/ If so, these are a couple of a good excerpts regarding the black levels, with which I tend to agree: "...but it never once feels like anything other than a 1980s colour grading brought to a shiny and digital life... Murder-Rock looks exactly like it should: a hazy, dream-like film shot over forty years ago on a low budget. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t look fabulous…because it does." I have only seen screengrabs of the VS disc, but in those grabs blacks looked intentionally lowered. In other words, they may look inkier, but not necessarily accurate and faithful to the original photography or theatrical look. Pick your poison, I suppose. In the end, I am sure they both have their pros and cons. I am personally extremely happy with the 88 release. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Sleazeaddict (08-12-2025), whysleep (08-03-2025) |
![]() |
#63 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
While you're at it, I did find this online: https://slow.pics/c/CYv3l0tA It's a comparison between the Scorpion and the VS. If you're able do you think you'd be able to note how the 88 compares to any of these caps? I noticed the grading's a little different between the Scorpion and VS, so aside from the VS having possibly lowered blacks than the 88, if there could be any difference in color too? |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | whysleep (08-04-2025) |
![]() |
#65 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Sounds like the 88 disc is a pretty safe bet. It was my assumption before either disc came out that they'd probably perform better than the VS. Has there ever been a situation where a VS release outdid something from 88? I feel like it's always 88 > VS.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Sleazeaddict (08-12-2025) |
![]() |
#66 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
There are some nice releases from VS, but in general 88 Films are really good.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
VS did release the UHD of Ebola Syndrome though. Whereas 88 Films only did the BD... a year after the BD. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
@DaylightsEnd has previously declared 88 as pretty much always besting Severin, I wonder if with releases like A Blade in the Dark and potentially Murder Rock , we might be able to say the same about VS too. (If 88 is better than Severin and VS, it's interesting that so far Celluloid Dreams has bested 88. We could potentially be seeing CD > 88 > Severin/VS) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Active Member
|
![]()
They're a very, very new label (like they only have two releases) that specialize in Italian giallo. So far they've done Case of the Bloody Iris and Short Night of Glass Dolls and both have been totally stellar 4K's. Especially in the case of Glass Dolls, which came out at the same time as 88's, it totally took the win, both in encode and color grading which was far more faithful to the original. Someone from CD made a very long, very detailed post in that release's thread about the way they approached grading the film and the reasons for it which really shows that they're taking the time to make each release special. Their next upcoming 4K will be Black Belly of the Tarantula.
Last edited by Yosef Quilty; 08-11-2025 at 02:28 AM. Reason: grammar |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | DaylightsEnd (08-11-2025) |
![]() |
#72 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
A Blade in the Dark is an interesting release. Both 88 and VS put out killer releases, once again proving that 16mm film is awesome on the 4k uhd platform. At that time, VS was consistently putting out uhd releases with pretty boosted/saturated color palettes (their norm), hotter skin tones, and pushed contrast, whereas 88 has always been a bit more conservative in their color palettes. Both releases were technically equal, with the choice coming down to personal preference on their different mastering styles. VS also used a gorgeous, very high-quality 45-degree slash-cut hard box case that is among my favorite packaging of any uhd. This is what I observed at the time between the two releases.... https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...9&postcount=45 The PQ between the competing VS and 88 releases of The Amityville Horror 4k uhd are also technically very close. Both are great mastering jobs. Both used the same color palette and saturation. 88 may have the slight advantage in the encode, but if so it's very slight. The real advantage there was 88 using the og audio, not a difference in pq. I do own both the 88 and VS Murder Rock 4k uhd releases. I watched the VS release and it's pretty phenomenal. I still have to do a direct comparison to the 88 Murder Rock uhd disc. It's pretty high on my to-do list. Last edited by DaylightsEnd; 08-11-2025 at 02:35 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
I wouldn't hesitate to buy any of CD's future releases. They have their hearts in the right place, and their heads screws on straight. Just like Indicator/Powerhouse. These are do-right boutiques. Every single uhd title released by Indicator to date has been absolutely top-shelf and wholly definitive in all respects, technically and artistically impeccable. And 88 is starting to forge its name on that block as well, as it continues to gain experience and grow its uhd catalog. I'm pleased that VS has more recently calmed down its color saturation, and has improved their own encodes on the format, as their recent uhd releases of Let's Scare Jessica to Death and Murder Rock are pretty stunning. Last edited by DaylightsEnd; 08-11-2025 at 02:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | DaylightsEnd (08-11-2025) |
![]() |
#75 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
I want to clarify that I'm not just slamming on Severin when I do these comparisons. I buy, and keep, all of their 4k uhd releases, and enjoy them. They easily best all prior blu ray releases, and in many respects are very, very good. They stand on their own. Their releases of The Church 4k, the Sect 4k, and Spider Labyrinth 4k, in particular, are excellent. The strict comparisons, though, once you get to the finite details that rule the uhd world, are fairly narrowly governed. Comparing encodes is detail work requiring a decently large high-quality display for best results. Unless an encode is so fatally flawed as to cause noticeable distractions like bad macroblocking, we're getting down to degrees of proficiency, more or less, and many collectors never even look this closely at a uhd in the first place. I'm not trying to pick on any one boutique, but Severin should really consider spending the time and money to implement more debris and damage cleanup in their uhd masters, and up their compression game slightly, to play in the same space that some of their competitors are beginning to dominate in repeatedly. Indicator, for example, uses Fidelity In Motion exclusively for their top-shelf encoding/compression services, which isn't cheap, but is incredibly worth-while. Arrow uses FiM largely as well for their uhd encodes, but on occasions when they don't use FiM, you can always easily tell that the compression could've, and should've, been better, if they'd spent the money on it (Don't Torture a Ducking 4k uhd cough cough).
Last edited by DaylightsEnd; 08-11-2025 at 03:13 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Okay, after doing some slap-dash comparison work, it seems like there might actually be a fairly substantial difference between the two discs, namely in the color grade.
While I don't have either disc, I have been able to find matching(ish) screenshots from both releases. IMPORTANTLY: These are NOT meant to represent things like encode, these are not proper screenGRABS, just screenSHOTS I've taken from Mondo and the VS site. VS VS 1.jpg 88 88 1.jpg VS VS 3.jpg 88 88 3.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
Labels like Celluloid Dreams and Second Sight really can't be compared to VS/88/Severin because their output is so low. It's like I've said before, if you spend 3 months making a paper airplane, it's expected your paper airplane will be more refined than someone who makes one in 3 minutes. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
Power Member
Mar 2011
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
88 films |
|
|