|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $134.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Guys, my retorts are subjective, but feel free to chime in. (i'm domerdel, red guy is Nfinity). If i've missed some points, feel free to respond.
http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/08...007/1#c8044625 Please note: not trying to advertise another site here, this can be an internal discussion among the blu-ray camp (whom i support), but just trying to put more heads together, and come up with a better response than my subject preferences. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
Bring up the fact that if he is viewing ANY MATERIAL ON BOTH FORMATS that it will undoubtedly look identical because it was encoded and finalized to the limitations of HD-DVD. In order to really get a sense of which format is better, we will all have to wait for a neutral studio to treat identical material as seperate encoding processes. You could try watching something like 'Casino Royale' or 'Pirates Of The Caribbean' BDs next to the 'Transformers' HD-DVD when it releases to get an idea of each formats quality, but it just can't be fairly compared as they aren't the same material. Until the segragation of material occurs for the encoding of neutral material, his comparative arguement is moot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Active Member
|
![]()
you can see my long, drawn out, over analyzed subjective opinion in the thread, but who's got the right to taunt me for my consumer choice? And I don't feel even remotely stupid or hesitant for choosing blu-ray because of it's roadmap'ed technology. Red's got, Pip/interactive, great, works for now, we went the other route, larger storage (bigger lens aperture) and higher bit rates, extras follow... doesn't that make sense?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Active Member
|
![]()
another factor (mentioned in thread of EHD), is that M$ and toshiba went with the lowest common denominator in disc size, which limits encoding, thus you can never tell the difference in a neutral movie title.... ah, i just feel like we're all having the same argument on both sides, that the red team is just not getting why we made our choices and exploits small issues making them into bigger ones that needed to be.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Active Member
|
![]()
Here's a good point by richard, thanks!
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Vote for Blu-ray.com in the Engadget HD poll | General Chat | Galley | 29 | 03-03-2009 02:35 PM |
Engadget: Niveus servers go Blu-ray exclusive | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | w_tanoto | 13 | 02-16-2008 03:55 AM |
Engadget Blu-ray Warner Bros. Poll | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | bbg | 101 | 12-19-2007 10:02 AM |
Vote for Blu-ray on Engadget HD | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Leon Kennedy | 25 | 12-14-2007 02:57 PM |
|
|