|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $37.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $23.89 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $19.99 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
Johnny Handsome has just been released by Lionsgate (7/27/10).
"John Sedley is a petty gangster whose facial deformities earned him the nickname "Johnny Handsome." When Johnny and a friend are double-crossed during a robbery by two partners, his friend is killed and Johnny is sent to prison. There, a sympathetic surgeon makes a deal to give Johnny a new face - and a new shot at life. Once on the outside, Johnny discovers that staying straight isn't easy. But his new look does open one door for Johnny - revenge." johnny.jpg Johnny Handsome Blu-ray Review |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
|
![]()
Love the movie ( is there a Mickey Rourke film I don`t ? ) sadly only region A. Hopefully region B will be better in PQ wise .... not a perfect movie but Mickey does again great performance, as does Morgan Freeman
[Show spoiler] Lance could have been replaced with more "credible" and better actor and film would have turn out better. [Show spoiler] , as in so many other movies before and after ...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Great movie. It was my #1 of that year. Walter Hill doesn't get the respect he deserves. I will definitely be getting this as this will mark this first time it was ever released in Widescreen, and having it on BR is ideal...but the COVER ART SUCKS! Couldn't they at least mirror the poster for this?!?!
![]() They really need to hire better marketing creatives. -UJ |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]()
I watched Johnny Handsome over the weekend, for the first time ever. There aren't enough Ellen Barkin pics out there for sure.
[Show spoiler] She was great in the film, so was rest of the cast. Rourke certainly deserves a lot more credit. There were instances on some early scenes dealing with certain photography techniques used that the image seemed really poor. The film deserved some more disc space possibly. Though many scenes looked really detailed and good. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|