As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
5 hrs ago
I Know What You Did Last Summer 4K (Blu-ray)
$39.99
10 hrs ago
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
17 hrs ago
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
11 hrs ago
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$80.68
21 hrs ago
Batman 4-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
 
Batman 4K (Blu-ray)
$10.49
11 hrs ago
Peanuts: Ultimate TV Specials Collection (Blu-ray)
$72.99
1 day ago
A Nightmare on Elm Street Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$96.99
1 day ago
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
1 day ago
Together 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.72
15 hrs ago
Zack Snyder's Justice League Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.49
11 hrs ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-25-2011, 11:14 PM   #1
bone crusher bone crusher is offline
Banned
 
bone crusher's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
canada
259
Default Why aren't all Blu-rays/dvds region free?

Wouldn't it be nice if all our BD players could play any disc from anywhere in the world? What is the reasoning for making particular movies region locked?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 11:20 PM   #2
Dotpattern Dotpattern is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Dotpattern's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Southern California
409
1505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bone crusher View Post
Wouldn't it be nice if all our BD players could play any disc from anywhere in the world? What is the reasoning for making particular movies region locked?
It has to do with different studios owning the distribution rights to a specific country. For instance, (totally hypothetical and simplified) let's say Fox and WB joined to produce a movie. And let's say Fox owned the distribution rights in the US, while WB owned the rights to Europe. The disc would be region locked when WB released the movie in Europe to control sales in Europe, and vice versa. It actually gets more complicated with the more studios, especially independent studios, are involved.

Last edited by Dotpattern; 03-25-2011 at 11:23 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 11:22 PM   #3
Jim Purcell Jim Purcell is offline
Power Member
 
Jim Purcell's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
99
1004
265
Default

Money.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 11:23 PM   #4
Blu-ray Fanatic Blu-ray Fanatic is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Blu-ray Fanatic's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
San Antonio
1
Default

Bottom line: It's all about money and authority.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 11:46 PM   #5
Gremal Gremal is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Gremal's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
Daddyland
49
184
Default

It's more about ROI and honoring business deals and intellectual property.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 11:52 PM   #6
Clark Kent Clark Kent is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Clark Kent's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Metropolis
2
184
Default

Even if a studio owns a movie's rights on a global basis, they want to be able to maximize revenue in each territory depending on market factors and other considerations. What often happens is a movie will be released months, or even years later, in different countries.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 12:25 AM   #7
Todd_Gaines Todd_Gaines is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Todd_Gaines's Avatar
 
Jan 2011
Letterboxd
4
863
96
1
133
Default

So I can't watch La Haine (the UK release) , Elite Squad, and Sin Nombre on my PS3.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 12:27 AM   #8
RBBrittain RBBrittain is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
RBBrittain's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Little Rock, AR
762
1865
93
989
349
56
5
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dotpattern View Post
It has to do with different studios owning the distribution rights to a specific country. For instance, (totally hypothetical and simplified) let's say Fox and WB joined to produce a movie. And let's say Fox owned the distribution rights in the US, while WB owned the rights to Europe. The disc would be region locked when WB released the movie in Europe to control sales in Europe, and vice versa. It actually gets more complicated with the more studios, especially independent studios, are involved.
Fox would likely region-lock the US edition, but WB probably would make most of the European editions region-free. It has a lot to do with the studio; WB, Universal, Sony & MoC won't region-lock unless the underlying rights owner demands it, but Fox region-locks most of its U.S. titles (though a growing number are region-free), as do most indies.

For example, Dances With Wolves was generally region-free wherever WB owned the rights (i.e., UK) as well as in France (Fox Pathé), but region-locked by most other distributors, i.e., U.S. (MGM/Fox) and Germany (Kinowelt). And that was the reverse of the usual situation Clark is referring to--that BD was out in Europe *before* the States.

OTOH, while Fox allowed MoC to make Sunrise region-free as they had no other plans to release it (the underlying transfer was for a DVD only available in the expensive Murnau, Borzage & Fox boxset), the F.W. Murnau Foundation forced MoC to region-lock Metropolis to avoid conflicts with its U.S. licensee, Kino. Likewise, Kino was forced to region-lock Metropolis here; its U.S. release was delayed by a week because Kino's first production run was mistakenly region-free.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 12:28 AM   #9
s2mikey s2mikey is offline
Banned
 
s2mikey's Avatar
 
Nov 2008
Upstate, NY
130
303
40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-ray Fanatic View Post
Bottom line: It's all about money and authority.
Right and lets be honest - this region crap is where HD DVD blew away blu-ray. I hate that nonsense. The problem is that some studios are cool about it but most are not. FOX, Disney, and Sony - all the heaviest blu-ray supporters back during the HD disc wars refused to deal with HD DVD for this reason. Warner and Paramount didnt seem to care too much though.

Oh well. Its BS and is still a black-eye on the format, IMO.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 12:53 AM   #10
RBBrittain RBBrittain is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
RBBrittain's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Little Rock, AR
762
1865
93
989
349
56
5
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd_Gaines View Post
So I can't watch La Haine (the UK release) , Elite Squad, and Sin Nombre on my PS3.
Correct, unless you have a Region B PS3, preferably with a TV that can handle PAL/50Hz video. (PS3 hackers may crack region coding momentarily, but Sony regularly closes those with mandatory system updates.) The most legal means of bypassing that is a SA player with multi-region capabilities, either thru remote hacks (like my Sherwood--cross your fingers the hack won't be killed by a future firmware update, but so far I haven't needed one though reportedly the kill is out there) or mod chips. It can also be bypassed by certain HTPC software that can't be discussed on this board.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 01:41 AM   #11
unclemat unclemat is offline
Active Member
 
Dec 2010
MA, USA
83
3
Default

Simple answer: Dune player. Region free via a software patch.

Plus combined with AnyDVD you can stream blu-ray rips from a computer/network storage.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 03:05 AM   #12
The Theory The Theory is offline
Senior Member
 
The Theory's Avatar
 
Jun 2010
Lancaster, PA
369
Default

As others have said... money.

But a bit more specifically, it is a tool that the owners of a film use to control distribution.

If US company A makes a movie and licenses it to European company B, then the reasonable expectation is that a US consumer will buy from company A and a European consumer will buy from company B and everyone is happy. If a US consumer imports from company B the effect is two-fold. 1. Company A misses out on a sale and 2. Company B makes a sale that isn't a part of their region. On a small scale this isn't a huge problem, especially for major Hollywood titles. But on a larger scale it can have major implications, especially for niche markets.

Take Japanese animation (anime) as an example of a niche market which can be hurt by importing. Japanese companies produce and own the anime. Their main focus is their market--but because there is demand in the US for anime they Japanese companies will license anime movies and shows to US companies. However, anime in the US is MUCH cheaper than anime in Japan, so the big fear for Japanese companies is that Japanese consumers will import product from the US rather than buy their own releases. Just an example of the figures--a DVD or blu-ray in Japan with 2 or 3 episodes will retail for around the US equivalent of $70. In the US you can (usually) get the entire 12 or 24 episode series for $60 or less. A phenomenal price difference. The Japanese companies wouldn't want to lose their consumer base to importing, so they were a fan of the DVD region difference between Japan and the US--that kept the importing to a minimum.

(They, of course, would not be concerned with US consumers importing anime from Japan... US consumers would be unlikely to import anything already available in the US due to the steep pricing difference. Everyone, on the other hand, is concerned with illegal bootleg "imports" which are way cheaper than either Japanese or US releases, but that is a different topic all together.)

I haven't kept up with anime enough in the past year or so to see how they're handling blu-ray releases, since Japan and the US share the same region in this format. For some releases I've seen Japan has made the US company agree to only include an English language track. In other cases they're making the US company wait to release the product until its been out in Japan long enough to capture the hardcore sales.

In any case (getting back to non-anime importing), it'll be interesting to see how the upcoming US releases of anticipated titles like Pulp Fiction do since there has been good region-free releases available for a couple of years now that people have been actively importing. It is probably a popular enough title that the US company will still do well with it, but the number of imports in America right now is fairly significant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 03:31 AM   #13
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is online now
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2371
128
751
1093
598
133
39
Default

One of the many reasons I preferred HD DVD to BD. All HD DVDs were region free and that sure was a nice perk.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 03:33 AM   #14
Blu-ray Fanatic Blu-ray Fanatic is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Blu-ray Fanatic's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
San Antonio
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
One of the many reasons I preferred HD DVD to BD. All HD DVDs were region free and that sure was a nice perk.
Fanboy
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 03:35 AM   #15
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is online now
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2371
128
751
1093
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-ray Fanatic View Post
Fanboy
I have never been a fanboy of anything other than 1080p on a tangible format. Why else would I have nearly six hundred BDs? Name calling is not welcome around here either.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 04:09 AM   #16
Dubstar Dubstar is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Dubstar's Avatar
 
Jun 2008
down at Fraggle Rock
1
201
1953
304
4
33
29
Default

four words: Criterion, British Film Institute ...
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 04:40 AM   #17
ZoetMB ZoetMB is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
May 2009
New York
172
27
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s2mikey View Post
Right and lets be honest - this region crap is where HD DVD blew away blu-ray. I hate that nonsense. The problem is that some studios are cool about it but most are not. FOX, Disney, and Sony - all the heaviest blu-ray supporters back during the HD disc wars refused to deal with HD DVD for this reason. Warner and Paramount didnt seem to care too much though.

Oh well. Its BS and is still a black-eye on the format, IMO.
It's not B.S. It's about protecting the rights of a distributor. Let's say you bought the rights to sell Citizen Kane in Europe. You paid a lot of money for those rights. You'd like a return on your investment, otherwise you might not be able to stay in business and a lot of people would lose their jobs.

But Turner, who owns the rights in the U.S., starts selling against you in Europe. You say, "wait a minute - they didn't pay anything to sell in Europe. I paid a big license fee and now I'm getting totally screwed."

As a consumer, you probably don't give a damn - you just want to buy the movie at the lowest possible price and you don't want to be stopped from buying movies that might not even be available in your country.

Fights like this have been going on forever. Courts have ruled, for example, against the import of parallel editions. So bookstores here can't legitimately sell the British editions of Harry Potter. And generally they didn't, but if someone did import British editions, there was no technology to stop someone from reading the Brit edition. (I used to travel to Europe and I would always seek to buy books that weren't yet published in the U.S.). Same thing in the record industry, which is more like the BR industry. Again, no technology could stop me listening to the British releases of early Beatles records as opposed to the butchered Capital releases.

But since the advent of the DVD, technology has been available to stop people from viewing video not intended for their market. But online viewing is making this moot anyway. So at this point, the region encoding IMO isn't worth the bang for the buck and it should be eliminated in all but the most extreme circumstances. But I understand why the studios still want it in at least some cases. Frankly, I'm amazed that not all releases are region coded.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 05:45 AM   #18
pro-bassoonist pro-bassoonist is offline
Blu-ray reviewer
 
pro-bassoonist's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
X
47
-
-
-
31
23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
One of the many reasons I preferred HD DVD to BD. All HD DVDs were region free and that sure was a nice perk.
What wasn't is that because HDDVD was region-free by default, many, many films simply would have never appeared on the format - which is one of many reasons why HDDVD was not good for the industry, and which is one of many reasons why it was not good for the consumer. Region-Free discs without content are just that...discs, and no one buys and collects discs; people buy the high-quality content that is on the discs.

At the end of the day, when one carefully analyzes the big picture (and specifically how the market has been functioning for years), Blu-ray was the more consumer-friendly option (see above) and the format with the better tech portfolio.

The better format won. The consumers won as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoetMB View Post
It's not B.S. It's about protecting the rights of a distributor.
Bingo!

Pro-B

Last edited by pro-bassoonist; 03-26-2011 at 05:48 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 05:52 AM   #19
One4Deuce One4Deuce is offline
Special Member
 
One4Deuce's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Minnesota, USA
36
1830
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Purcell View Post
Money.
The answer to all of life's questions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2011, 11:11 AM   #20
xxstrataxx xxstrataxx is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
xxstrataxx's Avatar
 
Mar 2010
Upstate, NY
257
327
Default

money money money monnnnney!
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:09 PM.