|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $36.69 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $37.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $80.68 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 | ![]() $10.49 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $72.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $96.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $30.72 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.49 11 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
It has to do with different studios owning the distribution rights to a specific country. For instance, (totally hypothetical and simplified) let's say Fox and WB joined to produce a movie. And let's say Fox owned the distribution rights in the US, while WB owned the rights to Europe. The disc would be region locked when WB released the movie in Europe to control sales in Europe, and vice versa. It actually gets more complicated with the more studios, especially independent studios, are involved.
Last edited by Dotpattern; 03-25-2011 at 11:23 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
Even if a studio owns a movie's rights on a global basis, they want to be able to maximize revenue in each territory depending on market factors and other considerations. What often happens is a movie will be released months, or even years later, in different countries.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
For example, Dances With Wolves was generally region-free wherever WB owned the rights (i.e., UK) as well as in France (Fox Pathé), but region-locked by most other distributors, i.e., U.S. (MGM/Fox) and Germany (Kinowelt). And that was the reverse of the usual situation Clark is referring to--that BD was out in Europe *before* the States. OTOH, while Fox allowed MoC to make Sunrise region-free as they had no other plans to release it (the underlying transfer was for a DVD only available in the expensive Murnau, Borzage & Fox boxset), the F.W. Murnau Foundation forced MoC to region-lock Metropolis to avoid conflicts with its U.S. licensee, Kino. Likewise, Kino was forced to region-lock Metropolis here; its U.S. release was delayed by a week because Kino's first production run was mistakenly region-free. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Banned
|
![]()
Right and lets be honest - this region crap is where HD DVD blew away blu-ray. I hate that nonsense. The problem is that some studios are cool about it but most are not. FOX, Disney, and Sony - all the heaviest blu-ray supporters back during the HD disc wars refused to deal with HD DVD for this reason. Warner and Paramount didnt seem to care too much though.
Oh well. Its BS and is still a black-eye on the format, IMO. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Correct, unless you have a Region B PS3, preferably with a TV that can handle PAL/50Hz video. (PS3 hackers may crack region coding momentarily, but Sony regularly closes those with mandatory system updates.) The most legal means of bypassing that is a SA player with multi-region capabilities, either thru remote hacks (like my Sherwood--cross your fingers the hack won't be killed by a future firmware update, but so far I haven't needed one though reportedly the kill is out there) or mod chips. It can also be bypassed by certain HTPC software that can't be discussed on this board.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
As others have said... money.
But a bit more specifically, it is a tool that the owners of a film use to control distribution. If US company A makes a movie and licenses it to European company B, then the reasonable expectation is that a US consumer will buy from company A and a European consumer will buy from company B and everyone is happy. If a US consumer imports from company B the effect is two-fold. 1. Company A misses out on a sale and 2. Company B makes a sale that isn't a part of their region. On a small scale this isn't a huge problem, especially for major Hollywood titles. But on a larger scale it can have major implications, especially for niche markets. Take Japanese animation (anime) as an example of a niche market which can be hurt by importing. Japanese companies produce and own the anime. Their main focus is their market--but because there is demand in the US for anime they Japanese companies will license anime movies and shows to US companies. However, anime in the US is MUCH cheaper than anime in Japan, so the big fear for Japanese companies is that Japanese consumers will import product from the US rather than buy their own releases. Just an example of the figures--a DVD or blu-ray in Japan with 2 or 3 episodes will retail for around the US equivalent of $70. In the US you can (usually) get the entire 12 or 24 episode series for $60 or less. A phenomenal price difference. The Japanese companies wouldn't want to lose their consumer base to importing, so they were a fan of the DVD region difference between Japan and the US--that kept the importing to a minimum. (They, of course, would not be concerned with US consumers importing anime from Japan... US consumers would be unlikely to import anything already available in the US due to the steep pricing difference. Everyone, on the other hand, is concerned with illegal bootleg "imports" which are way cheaper than either Japanese or US releases, but that is a different topic all together.) I haven't kept up with anime enough in the past year or so to see how they're handling blu-ray releases, since Japan and the US share the same region in this format. For some releases I've seen Japan has made the US company agree to only include an English language track. In other cases they're making the US company wait to release the product until its been out in Japan long enough to capture the hardcore sales. In any case (getting back to non-anime importing), it'll be interesting to see how the upcoming US releases of anticipated titles like Pulp Fiction do since there has been good region-free releases available for a couple of years now that people have been actively importing. It is probably a popular enough title that the US company will still do well with it, but the number of imports in America right now is fairly significant. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
But Turner, who owns the rights in the U.S., starts selling against you in Europe. You say, "wait a minute - they didn't pay anything to sell in Europe. I paid a big license fee and now I'm getting totally screwed." As a consumer, you probably don't give a damn - you just want to buy the movie at the lowest possible price and you don't want to be stopped from buying movies that might not even be available in your country. Fights like this have been going on forever. Courts have ruled, for example, against the import of parallel editions. So bookstores here can't legitimately sell the British editions of Harry Potter. And generally they didn't, but if someone did import British editions, there was no technology to stop someone from reading the Brit edition. (I used to travel to Europe and I would always seek to buy books that weren't yet published in the U.S.). Same thing in the record industry, which is more like the BR industry. Again, no technology could stop me listening to the British releases of early Beatles records as opposed to the butchered Capital releases. But since the advent of the DVD, technology has been available to stop people from viewing video not intended for their market. But online viewing is making this moot anyway. So at this point, the region encoding IMO isn't worth the bang for the buck and it should be eliminated in all but the most extreme circumstances. But I understand why the studios still want it in at least some cases. Frankly, I'm amazed that not all releases are region coded. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Blu-ray reviewer
|
![]() Quote:
At the end of the day, when one carefully analyzes the big picture (and specifically how the market has been functioning for years), Blu-ray was the more consumer-friendly option (see above) and the format with the better tech portfolio. The better format won. The consumers won as well. Bingo! Pro-B Last edited by pro-bassoonist; 03-26-2011 at 05:48 AM. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|