|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() €9.37 | ![]() €22.99 | ![]() €23.10 | ![]() €34.99 14 hrs ago
| ![]() €22.99 | ![]() €12.99 | ![]() €26.32 1 day ago
| ![]() €22.99 | ![]() €9.99 1 day ago
| ![]() €27.13 1 hr ago
| ![]() €12.99 | ![]() €34.84 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Next year, German company Alpha-Omega Digital will release Ernst Lubitsch's The Loves of Pharaoh (Das Weib des Pharao, 1922) on Blu-ray.
![]() Additional material:
Languages: German, English, French, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Arabic The film is presented in 10 selectable language versions. The title cards are re-created as full screen intertitles as was common practice for foreign releases in the silent film era. The titles were translated by colleagues and friends who came to the project with a profound subject expertise. For the German, English, French and Italian versions the original type face could be used. The Spanish, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Thai and Arabic versions exhibit a different appearance due to their unique characteristics. Specifications: One BD50 disc Duration: Main Feature: ca. 100min, Additional Material: ca. 144min Frame Rate: 20 f/s Resolution: HD 1920×1080 Aspect Ratio: 4:3 (1,33:1) (main feature) Audio: PCM 2.0 Stereo| DTS-HD 5.1 Source Material: Original Russian and Italian nitrate release prints FSK 0: No age restriction in Germany Price: Blu-ray: €34.90 International shipping: €6.50 Read more about the film, the restoration and the Blu-ray release. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Gorgon (12-06-2019) |
![]() |
#3 | |
Contributor
|
![]() ![]() I shot an e-mail off to Thomas Bakels from the Alpha-Omega web site, and he replied very quickly: Quote:
Last edited by McCrutchy; 12-28-2011 at 03:37 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
It's finally ready!
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
![]() Sep 2009
|
![]()
I'll be placing an order for this soon.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
![]() Sep 2009
|
![]()
Just got mine today. Great film and transfer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Blu-ray reviewer
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Jan 2011
Hungary
-
|
![]()
I'll have to wait and hope that Kino or somebody else is going to release this in the future, using the same source elements, but with less digital tampering. Too much scratch removal and frame stabilization in this edition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I got my copy today!
![]() it's a shame this company didn't use a box with a locking disc hub, as mine was a floater. It can easily get jostled around in the box because the box is actually bigger than it needs to be even with the booklet. Oh well, I only noticed a few light scratches. Hopefully no playback issues. looks like a grand release. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
New Member
Sep 2012
|
![]() Quote:
A distributors have simply turned us down with this project B distributors have only offered to do a SD release, they said BluRay 'no way' ! (btw: 4 out of 5 disks we sold so far are BluRays) C distributors have offered to release it, but with conditions that required 100.000 silent film buyers to ever make the investment back on our end. There aren't that many, considering that some even call themselves 'silent film lovers' but download the 720-Rip for free, in complete ignorance of the far beyond reasonable efforts to go through to bring a lost film back to the screen; it has been years of work. We are working on a release option for NA with a guy who is a true film lover but that's not settled yet. In the meantime please know, that we have sold to 18 countries from Korea to Canada and people have received their disks directly from us. We do the job just like anyone else would, but we are here in person in case of some complaint, no "don't answer to this..."-email acct. -Alpha-Omega digital- Last edited by TBak; 09-15-2012 at 10:46 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
New Member
Sep 2012
|
![]() Quote:
About 'digital tampering' you wouldn't know what it needs to restore a very damaged image sequence except if you actually did this sort of work before. Having been in charge of the 2001 and 2010 Metropolis restoration as well as the restoration of numerous other very difficult tasks over 12 years, I can tell you that nobody would be able to do a more careful and thoughtful restoration on this film as what you can see on the BluRay now. It has been some years since this project began in 2003 (!) and not everything is perfect, I agree, but several scenes I didn't like have even been tried to get better in 2010 and 2011 before the release, but going back to what the raw scan was, the result wouldn't be much different. Also I wish to point out that lots of the 'vertical line' scratches have not been tampered with, since it showed that every attempt to get rid of them was not near perfect, so we left the 'traditional' defects instead of replacing them with 'a digital something'. Frame stabilisation: if a film comes with vast perforation missing (some >100ft) you have image sequences with no stability at all after the raw scans. To get them stable you need to stabilise them perfectly, for you can't tell a computer to stabilise 'a little'. The perfect stabilised sequence would then represent what was going on in front of the camera really, for rooms wouldn't shake or rock or pulse up-down or left-right. Some have made the point that perfect stabilisation is seeming 'unnatural'. But if I give you the option to put a new instability behaviour on the shots, what would you decide to put on them ? A left-right movement ? What speed, what impulse ? Or a light random shake ? .... let me ask you: on what would you base your decision ? There is no 'typical movie print shakyness of a 1920s movie - in 1920 labs could do a perfectly stable copy and some acutally did. I have personally scanned some Hal Roach movies from 1st answer nitrate prints of the late 1920s. Their image stability was striking and didn't call for any digital work right after the scanning. It was possible, and all the bad shaky projection prints that you base your 'knowledge' of stability on, are second-, third-, and fourth-best lab-jobs. Simple as that. This is from someone who actually does this work and knows from experience. No offence, friend, just putting what you wrote in a professional context. ![]() If someone would like to check these images in large resolution, please download from here: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2803731/material_condition.jpg Last edited by TBak; 09-15-2012 at 10:42 PM. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|