|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $68.47 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.59 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $14.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $80.68 | ![]() $96.99 |
![]() |
#11 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Finally the most awaited Sicario review is up.
https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Sicar...147731/#Review Why awaited if anyone asking, its DI was in 4K and so 4K UHD ought to deliver something better than others. But unfortunately once again, the differences do not pop up here too. Ofcourse I am aware its still evolving but I have this feeling that UHD format is not suited for movies which have mix of soft and sharp portions, and deliberately color toned/ color filters for mood development as well as today's trend of deliberate grainy look to create that pseudo documentary feel even for the most mainstream of movies. What i mean to say is if something is consistently sharp for the entire frame and is not color tweaked, say for a football match or say a travel documentary which are only aimed at showcasing sharpest details possible in all shots, UHD might score significantly better there. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Hindustani (03-09-2016) |
|
|
![]() |
|
|