|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() £49.99 | ![]() £9.99 | ![]() £22.99 | ![]() £39.99 | ![]() £30.60 | ![]() £19.99 19 hrs ago
| ![]() £16.99 | ![]() £19.99 20 hrs ago
| ![]() £14.99 | ![]() £19.99 1 day ago
| ![]() £16.99 | ![]() £13.99 |
![]() |
#34 | |
Blu-ray reviewer
|
![]() Quote:
The sad thing is that you come here to act as a man of principles and yet it is painfully obvious that any analysis that does not reflect your view is automatically deemed sad. This, however, is not unexpected. The analysis is very clear: There are poor errors that could have been addressed. They are not. You, apparently, choose the view that what is on the disc is all that could have been done. We very much disagree. I already explained multiple times why. The notion that this is how the film appears on all elements is absolutely flawed. (And I would love to hear where this certainty comes from). It is not how it was shot and it is not how it was intended to be seen. You are free to argue the opposite view, but it is extremely difficult to do so -- at least if you know what you are looking at. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|