|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#11 |
Special Member
|
![]()
The hard part about this is that, in filmmaking, style can equate to substance. In other words, being a visual medium, the emphasis is often on colors, tone, atmosphere, images, scenery, cinematography.
While I wouldn't go so far to say that plot is unimportant in film, I do personally think it is a secondary factor. With a book, it is everything. But with films, style indeed is the thing most blatantly on display. In a perfect world, a great story will tie in with a stylistic picture and you will have an all-time type of film. But for me the look of a film or the look of an actress (or both) are the most primary things in movies. That may sound a bit shallow but, as mentioned, we are dealing with a visual medium. I will always choose a stylistic or alluring film with a "weak or nonsensical" plot over a great story with mundane cinematography or characters. If being honest, most favorite directors will favor style or substance. Or, rather, style is their substance - Kubrick, Lynch, Lean, etc. I'm not saying their films don't contain great "stories", just that the imagery, pace, mood or characters is what really stands out. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | BobbyMcGee (07-27-2016) |
|
|
![]() |
|
|