|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $35.00 | ![]() $67.11 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.32 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $32.28 37 min ago
| ![]() $14.37 1 day ago
| ![]() $23.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $22.49 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#9 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
I subscribed to the thread initially to be kept informed of actual problems that merit replacement discs. Now I receive very regular emails, with messages discussing how a dozen or so new titles have been added, all because someone has asserted that these titles are "poor" because you can find some extra macroblocks on a 400% zoomed-in screenshot than a UK or DE release of the film. The list is thus no longer useful and has actually become an annoyance. So when someone says "With all these defects, why do people still give them money?", that prompts my answer of "These are not significant defects, these are nitpicks from pedants." People still give Shout money because they release a ton of interesting titles, most at acceptable or good quality, and they usually fix actually significant problems that truly require a replacement disc. Sometimes they really do drop the ball, like the Billy Jack release, but I don't see how such actual ball-dropping even stands out anymore in a silly list with entry after entry of so-called "poor compression." Last edited by neo_reloaded; 07-12-2019 at 01:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | ashedmaniac (07-13-2019), Brent Reid (01-31-2020), cdhinrichs (07-21-2019), gobad2003 (07-12-2019), GOMEZFAN69 (07-12-2019), kngtmat (07-12-2019), nateynate87 (05-02-2020), rbarb (07-22-2019), RCRochester (07-12-2019), Shemp (09-24-2019), SpazeBlue (03-12-2021), Thomas Veil (10-09-2020), UFAlien (09-24-2019) |
|
|
![]() |
|
|