|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $37.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $38.02 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.72 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 36 min ago
| ![]() $36.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 36 min ago
| ![]() $79.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $10.49 36 min ago
| ![]() $31.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $38.02 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.49 36 min ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
|
![]()
I'm wondering if there's a big enough market for them. I just find releases like Blade Runner 2049 so odd. There's all this additional information in the IMAX version, but the studio only gives us a 2.4:1 (or whatever) presentation. I know the studios think people hate black bars on the sides, but aren't the bars on the top and bottom even bigger? If 2.4:1 (or whatever) is the director's preferred aspect ratio, why even shoot it on IMAX? Those cameras are massive and cumbersome, not to mention really expensive.
I don't even much care for the movie, but I'd still watch the IMAX presentation at least once. Some screenshots I found: https://imgur.com/a/lBJGasw Last edited by Bn43; 11-09-2019 at 05:22 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | eLuminX (11-09-2019) |
|
|
![]() |
|
|