Inglourious Basterds 4K UHD (2009) - Page 39 - Blu-ray Forum

Scottishguy · 10-06-2021, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geoff D

War of the Worlds was still finished out to film, but Crystal Skull was Señor Spielbergo's first Digital Intermediate. For the 4K UHD release of the latter it does appear that the non-VFX material was newly transferred from the camera negative and reconformed with upscaled 2K VFX shots, thus blowing a hole in the paragraphs of waffle I've posted above - but that it takes someone of the stature of Spielbergo to insist upon a 4K rebuild of his movie says it all TBH, and it's part of that 00.1% mentioned above.

Still, something, something, giving the enemy a gun to shoot you with. See it can be done! They all should be done!!

Scottishguy · 10-06-2021, 04:12 PM

Also why Nae Changes "recommendation" for IB is stupid. It's a 2K upscale, not native. So you aren't suddenly going to get bags of detail by virtue of size. A more robust image vs the HD Blu, sure.

The main refinements in luminosity and colour from HDR can be seen at any size. I mean they have 32" grading monitors for fook sake. And also there's an argument with these premium end consumer chipsets, that having a smaller screen size to work with yields better performance in HDR processing. Actually it probably isn't even an argument I imagine.

YouTube is full of tubes.

gates70 · 10-06-2021, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesaint2332

For anyone who trusts SpareChange's reviews, he just released his YouTube review and suggests for those who have a 75" or smaller display may want to stick with the BR unless you are fans and just want the "minimal upgrade" the UHD offers.

SpareChange doesn't do reviews, he looks at it and gives his opinion. Does the same with audio and video gear "Yeah, so this looks good" or "Yeah, I don't like the sound". Never understood why anyone follows him.

Member-425016 · 10-06-2021, 05:09 PM

You want depressing? Read the comment section of the FAH review. So many people make decisions just on his word alone. Like I said I don't care that he makes the videos, it is that people blindly follow him.

Scottishguy · 10-06-2021, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Filmfan73

You want depressing? Read the comment section of the FAH review. So many people make decisions just on his word alone. Like I said I don't care that he makes the videos, it is that people blindly follow him.

Oh if only people had supported me in my bid to have Kino cancel their partnership with him, hmmmm?

Such actions as that proving successful might lead to other labels and studios reconsidering their partnerships. Eventually his audience would notice that, and thus start to wake up.

That's alllllright though. We can just go round in circles everytime these threads everytime one of his "reviews" is goes up.

Agent Kay · 10-06-2021, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Filmfan73

You want depressing? Read the comment section of the FAH review. So many people make decisions just on his word alone. Like I said I don't care that he makes the videos, it is that people blindly follow him.

Said it for like 10 years the guy knows film restoration, but my God he is clueless with digital

BijouMan · 10-06-2021, 05:40 PM

Can we all stop making fun of Films At Home please? I wouldn't want Films At Home to be offended if he finds forum posts like these on a new disc's thread on a major media collector forum site.

Scottishguy · 10-06-2021, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BijouMan

Can we all stop making fun of Films At Home please?

Christian Muth · 10-06-2021, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Filmfan73

You want depressing? Read the comment section of the FAH review. So many people make decisions just on his word alone. Like I said I don't care that he makes the videos, it is that people blindly follow him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent Kay

Said it for like 10 years the guy knows film restoration, but my God he is clueless with digital

Films at Home knows film restoration?

Chris

Agent Kay · 10-06-2021, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christian Muth

Films at Home knows film restoration?

Chris

Harris, misread your post as RAH

tama · 10-06-2021, 05:46 PM

FAH not RAH

Christian Muth · 10-06-2021, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent Kay

Harris

That's not what you were responding to.

And calling Robert Harris "clueless about digital" is absurd. He's made mistakes, but so has everybody.

Chris

Agent Kay · 10-06-2021, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christian Muth

That's not what you were responding to.

And calling Robert Harris "clueless about digital" is absurd. He's made mistakes, but so has everybody.

Chris

Yes it was like I said I misread it.
And no he is always wrong about disc reviews,

mckee74 · 10-06-2021, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BijouMan

Can we all stop making fun of Films At Home please? I wouldn't want Films At Home to be offended if he finds forum posts like these on a new disc's thread on a major media collector forum site.

Maybe you could start a thread about it...

Ricky G · 10-06-2021, 05:53 PM

FAH is the worst. When I first got into 4K I would watch some of his videos ( I didn't know any better) and then I started noticing all the wrong info he was sharing. It was apparent I knew more than he did. Joker shot on film? GTFOOH do your damn research.

Gacivory · 10-06-2021, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BijouMan

Can we all stop making fun of Films At Home please? I wouldn't want Films At Home to be offended if he finds forum posts like these on a new disc's thread on a major media collector forum site.

Won't someone think of the poor YouTuber!

He does actually have a defender. Haven't seen him around here in awhile. Maybe he gave up or got banned or both.

Sky_Captain · 10-06-2021, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BijouMan

Can we all stop making fun of Films At Home please? I wouldn't want Films At Home to be offended if he finds forum posts like these on a new disc's thread on a major media collector forum site.

BijouMan · 10-06-2021, 05:55 PM

Just so you know, when Films At Home was given the 2001: A Space Odyssey UHD by Warner Bros., they also gave him an exclusive packet containing how the disc was made and who all was involved. He goes over it in his review.

Gacivory · 10-06-2021, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BijouMan

Just so you know, when Films At Home was given the 2001: A Space Odyssey UHD by Warner Bros., they also gave him an exclusive packet containing how the disc was made and who all was involved. He goes over it in his review.

WB knew he wouldn't do his own research so they had to make sure he got something right.

tcripe · 10-06-2021, 05:57 PM

Literally had no idea this was releasing. I must of been sleeping under a rock. Day 1 purchase for sure.

10-06-2021, 05:40 PM	#767
BijouMan Blu-ray Samurai Top contributor Member since:Feb 2020 4K collection:- Blu-ray collection:- DVD collection:-	Can we all stop making fun of Films At Home please? I wouldn't want Films At Home to be offended if he finds forum posts like these on a new disc's thread on a major media collector forum site. Last edited by BijouMan; 10-06-2021 at 05:46 PM.

10-06-2021, 04:12 PM	#762
Scottishguy Banned Member since:Apr 2019 4K collection:134 Blu-ray collection:1989 DVD collection:26 Trading Score:1	Also why Nae Changes "recommendation" for IB is stupid. It's a 2K upscale, not native. So you aren't suddenly going to get bags of detail by virtue of size. A more robust image vs the HD Blu, sure. The main refinements in luminosity and colour from HDR can be seen at any size. I mean they have 32" grading monitors for fook sake. And also there's an argument with these premium end consumer chipsets, that having a smaller screen size to work with yields better performance in HDR processing. Actually it probably isn't even an argument I imagine. YouTube is full of tubes.

10-06-2021, 05:09 PM	#764
Member-425016 Special Member Member since:Mar 2017	You want depressing? Read the comment section of the FAH review. So many people make decisions just on his word alone. Like I said I don't care that he makes the videos, it is that people blindly follow him.

10-06-2021, 05:46 PM	#771
tama Blu-ray Ninja Top contributor Member since:Nov 2010 Location:San Jose, CA 4K collection:691 Blu-ray collection:1235	FAH not RAH

10-06-2021, 05:53 PM	#775
Ricky G Special Member Member since:Aug 2019 Location:Texas 4K collection:90 Blu-ray collection:457 DVD collection:3 Digital collection:88 Trading Score:1	FAH is the worst. When I first got into 4K I would watch some of his videos ( I didn't know any better) and then I started noticing all the wrong info he was sharing. It was apparent I knew more than he did. Joker shot on film? GTFOOH do your damn research.

10-06-2021, 05:55 PM	#778
BijouMan Blu-ray Samurai Top contributor Member since:Feb 2020 4K collection:- Blu-ray collection:- DVD collection:-	Just so you know, when Films At Home was given the 2001: A Space Odyssey UHD by Warner Bros., they also gave him an exclusive packet containing how the disc was made and who all was involved. He goes over it in his review.

10-06-2021, 05:57 PM	#780
tcripe Blu-ray Knight Member since:Jul 2018 Location:Seattle	Literally had no idea this was releasing. I must of been sleeping under a rock. Day 1 purchase for sure.

Best 4K Blu-ray Deals