|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $22.49 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $22.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $28.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $19.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
I am wondering why the reviews for Gladiator and Braveheart were not posted in a timely manner? I can understand that the reviews have to be "worked" in a logical order. In addition, the availability of titles can delay some reviews. However, during the past week the forum has added a number of catalog reviews for which the interest is nill. Not too many catalog releases arrive with the kind of interest that Gladiator and Braveheart bring. I think that the before mentioned titles should have been given top priority, and not have the reviews posted after the movies are available for purchase. I would have appreciated a review of Gladiator without having the reviewer be biased by the negativity surrounding the reviews. The longer until a review is published, the more likely it is to "fit in" with the already published reviews. With all due respect, what is the story here?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Braveheart vs. Gladiator 9/1/09 and Sapphire SE | Blu-ray Movies - North America | aggienader08 | 527 | 08-15-2011 06:25 PM |
gladiator and braveheart locked? | Blu-ray Movies - North America | blu-bren | 7 | 10-16-2009 09:01 PM |
Gladiator and Braveheart???? | Wish Lists | Best666 | 1 | 08-01-2008 01:05 PM |
Braveheart + Gladiator | Blu-ray Movies - North America | WeApOn | 9 | 05-01-2007 11:43 PM |
|
|