Predator (1987) (Ultimate Hunter Edition)

[davidjjanderson1981]

Originally Posted by Roy Batty

And again, and again, and again...

Get this into your head: it is NOT our view against yours.

You may care, that may be so, but you are simply WRONG. That's a fact.

he's not wrong you silly billy! get a grip

[persuazion]

Originally Posted by SpotOn

No, its just more of your pro-DNR crusading. This was discussed yesterday, but you probably seem to think we cannot figure out how to look up posting history.

I dont care if you look up my posting history all day and night. Im sure your in every single thread of a DNR movie calling everybody who disagreed with you idiots and uneducated joe 6 packs since your first day here.

[Nielsb90]

My god! 175 pages?? What happened lol

[davidjjanderson1981]

Originally Posted by persuazion

I dont care if you look up my posting history all day and night. Im sure your in every single thread of a DNR movie calling everybody who disagreed with you idiots and uneducated joe 6 packs since your first day here.

Dont worry my friend roy batty sounds like a right know it all! lol

[Roy Batty]

Originally Posted by persuazion

Ok it is a fact that I am wrong because I think it looks alright......that doesnt even make sense.

No, you are wrong because you can not understand that it DOES NOT LOOK ALRIGHT, it does look that way TO YOU, but it is not. It is not a proper, faithful presentation of the source materials. It being to your liking, or my liking, or anybody's liking, has NOTHING TO DO with it being right.

You may say YOU LIKE it, but if you insist in saying it looks fine, you are WRONG.

[persuazion]

Originally Posted by Roy Batty

No, you are wrong because you can not understand that it DOES NOT LOOK ALRIGHT, it does look that way TO YOU, but it is not. It is not a proper, faithful presentation of the source materials. It being to your liking has NOTHING TO DO with it being right.

You may say YOU LIKE it, but if you insist in saying it looks fine, you are WRONG.

Even if it looks fine IN MY EYES!!!!

[wormraper]

Originally Posted by persuazion

Even if it looks fine IN MY EYES!!!!

correct, just because you LIKE something doesn't mean it's PROPER

[davidjjanderson1981]

Originally Posted by Roy Batty

No, you are wrong because you can not understand that it DOES NOT LOOK ALRIGHT, it does look that way TO YOU, but it is not. It is not a proper, faithful presentation of the source materials. It being to your liking has NOTHING TO DO with it being right.

You may say YOU LIKE it, but if you insist in saying it looks fine, you are WRONG.

what a lot of crap! What movie is a total faithful presentation!

[wormraper]

Originally Posted by davidjjanderson1981

what a lot of crap! What movie is a total faithful presentation!

the goal is as close as possible even if total perfection can not be attained

[persuazion]

Originally Posted by wormraper

correct, just because you LIKE something doesn't mean it's PROPER

I dident say it was..... But to me it looks better........it may certainly,technically not be......it may be horrible....the worst transfer in bluray history,it may be despised by everybody in the world and every single copy recalled and burned and never talked about again without a death sentence.....but If I.....meaning me,myself and I think it looks good....THAT my friend,is still called an opinion.And that cant ever be wrong.

[wormraper]

Originally Posted by persuazion

I dident say it was..... But to me it looks better........it may certainly,technically not be......it may be horrible....the worst transfer in bluray history,it may be despised by everybody in the world and every single copy recalled and burned and never talked about again without a death sentence.....but If I.....meaning me,myself and I think it looks good....THAT my friend,is still called an opinion.And that cant ever be wrong.

yeah, that's your opinion. your OPINION on LIKING it may be correct, But not on how it SHOULD be. that's the point.

[persuazion]

Originally Posted by wormraper

the goal is as close as possible even if total perfection can not be attained

so every movie is altered.....but people just put up with it based on the extent of how much its different then the directors intent?

[markbr]

I think it looks good as well. I'm well pleased with the PQ better then the 2008 crappy version, I have both so I can please myself

[persuazion]

Originally Posted by wormraper

yeah, that's your opinion. your OPINION on LIKING it may be correct, But not on how it SHOULD be. that's the point.

Ill agree to that......glad we finally got that settled. I mean people love Twilight and stand in line hours an hours to see it. I dont understand it and think its crazy but I would never tell all those people they are wrong for doing it.

[davidjjanderson1981]

Originally Posted by wormraper

the goal is as close as possible even if total perfection can not be attained

so what about the newlly released star trek boxsets? they look awesome aswell now. does that make it bad? blu-ray makes a difference and it has to he new predator aswell.

[Roy Batty]

Originally Posted by davidjjanderson1981

Dont worry my friend roy batty sounds like a right know it all! lol

Like everybody else in this world, the things I don't know about vastly outnumber the things I do know a little about in millions to one ratio.

The difference here is that I don't try to turn my ignorance into smug arguments to defend my uneducated opinions on that overabundance of subjects, but try to LEARN instead and EDUCATE myself.

[wormraper]

Originally Posted by persuazion

so every movie is altered.....but people just put up with it based on the extent of how much its different then the directors intent?

if we're going into the teensy tiny details everything is altered if ever so slightly. It's a scientific impossibility to get every teensy scrip and scrape just right. BUT there is a range of acceptable change in everything in the universe. The closer to perfection the more acceptable, the wider the swing of change the less acceptable it becomes

[Yautja]

WOW, so many pages don't know what happened but anyway, instead of me reading every page here can I just ask the simple question!

Is it worth buying this version of the film?

Is the AQ & the PQ any good or is it the same as the previous edition?

thanks

[wormraper]

Originally Posted by davidjjanderson1981

so what about the newlly released star trek boxsets? they look awesome aswell now. does that make it bad? blu-ray makes a difference and it has to he new predator aswell.

They look the best they've ever looked however as blu-rays faithful to the source, they're pretty crappy.

[persuazion]

Originally Posted by Yautja

WOW, so many pages don't know what happened but anyway, instead of me reading every page here can I just ask the simple question!

Is it worth buying this version of the film?

Is the AQ & the PQ any good or is it the same as the previous edition?

thanks

oh boy.....