|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $68.47 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.59 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $14.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $54.45 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $80.68 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
This is something that I've been contemplating for a few months now and I haven't been able to come to a conclusion on my own that satisfies my curiosity. By completely balanced I don't mean just XLR connections but a balanced differential signal path. So for instance if you started with a balanced processor such as the Anthem AVM 50 or D2v which have balanced stereo inputs and also used the Emo XPA-1's and the balanced stereo inputs of the Oppo bd 95 would it be a significant improvement over non balanced or single ended gear? This would obviously only for two channel playback and not apply to any HT applications. I know that the main benefit of using balanced components is better noise rejection and a lower noise floor. Most balanced components are significantly more expensive than their single ended non balanced counter parts. So is it really worth the extra cost?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|