|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $67.11 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.37 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.00 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.32 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $37.99 | ![]() $27.54 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $72.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Didn't really know which subforum to post this in, but I thought it sounded like a newbie question :P.
Is it normal for blu-ray/dvd releases to have a different running time than when it was shown in the theaters, despite not being cut? I've noticed with a few dvds lately that the running time listed on the dvd is often a few min shorter or longer than the time listed on most websites such as imdb and wikipedia. Is it possible that these were originally shown at a different framerate which then had to be sped up or down to fit within the PAL specifications for the dvd/blu-ray release? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|