What do Blu manufacturers have against great classic cover art? - Blu-ray Forum

Movies Blu-ray 4K 3D DVD Digital MA iTunes Prime Games People Forum

▼

United States

Login

Join

Home

News

DVD

MA

My Blu‑ray.com

As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!

×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »

Top deals | New deals

Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)

Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)

Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)

The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)

The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)

Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)

Casper 4K (Blu-ray)

Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)

Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)

Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)

House Party 4K (Blu-ray)

		Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
What do Blu manufacturers have against great classic cover art?

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

10-24-2012, 03:45 PM	#1
bluskies Blu-ray Samurai Member since:Oct 2007 4K collection:287 Blu-ray collection:1848 DVD collection:235 Blu-ray reviews: 73	What do Blu manufacturers have against great classic cover art? I have noticed for quite awhile that when some studios issue a Blu of a classic, they give it the blandest cover art ever. Bond films recently reflect this. Some smaller companies do use original poster art, which I am happy about, but major studios...? Last edited by bluskies; 10-24-2012 at 03:49 PM.

Go Back

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23 AM.