Unforgiven (1992) (Remastered)

[Bates_Motel]

Originally Posted by allyndrew

Unforgiven was released in Theaters in 1992 and released on Blu-ray in 2007. This should have been Remastered in 2007...

Please. That was the very beginning of the format. Many studios didn't even know HOW to master something properly for blu-ray back then. In addition, studios were also trying to get product out so customers had something to buy, to even see if the format would be successful. Hindsight is 20/20, but don't be ignorant of the technology at the time as well as the studios' mindsets.

But this is the problem with today's society. Instead of being happy it got a remaster and looks fantastic, people would rather complain and dwell on things that didn't happen, or think should've happened. It's a sad state when complaining takes precedence over a positive.

[PuppetMasterBlu]

Well it would be nice if they put that remaster out so everyone could buy it and not just people with 4k players.

[HD Goofnut]

Originally Posted by PuppetMasterBlu

Well it would be nice if they put that remaster out so everyone could buy it and not just people with 4k players.

You don't have to have a 4K player. It has the BD with it.

[Aragorn the Elfstone]

Originally Posted by HD Goofnut

You don't have to have a 4K player. It has the BD with it.

Yeah.....no.

The Blu-ray release will come soon enough.

[joenostalgia23]

Originally Posted by allyndrew

Unforgiven was released in Theaters in 1992 and released on Blu-ray in 2007. This should have been Remastered in 2007...

Blade Runner was released in theaters in 1982 and remastered in 2007... so Unforgiven actually seems to fit the timeline for catalog titles

[Bates_Motel]

Originally Posted by joenostalgia23

Blade Runner was released in theaters in 1982 and remastered in 2007... so Unforgiven actually seems to fit the timeline for catalog titles

And the difference is, Blade Runner came out in 1982, not 1992, so the print was older, and the fact that Ridley went back and made a "Final Cut." That's why it was remastered then.

[geomon]

Originally Posted by Aragorn the Elfstone

Yeah.....no.

The Blu-ray release will come soon enough.

I don't blame you. $40 is a lot to pay for this. Make it $20 and I might be persuaded.

[Bates_Motel]

Originally Posted by geomon

I don't blame you. $40 is a lot to pay for this. Make it $20 and I might be persuaded.

Except it's not $40. I just paid $28 on Amazon.

[geomon]

Originally Posted by Bates_Motel

Except it's not $40. I just paid $28 on Amazon.

Price subject to change. It was like $35 yesterday.

[Chaotic]

Originally Posted by geomon

Price subject to change. It was like $35 yesterday.

Its been $26.99 for a week

[ROSS.T.G.]

Any ETA on the remastered standard BD?

[MassiveMovieBuff]

Originally Posted by ROSS.T.G.

Any ETA on the remastered standard BD?

I think it would've happened initially. I think this is the only way to get it for some reason

[ROSS.T.G.]

Originally Posted by MassiveMovieBuff

I think it would've happened initially. I think this is the only way to get it for some reason

Hmmm. I read that Warner will be releasing a standalone later this year but I haven't heard the street date. I'm not upgrading to 4k so I hope it's soon.

[MassiveMovieBuff]

Originally Posted by ROSS.T.G.

Hmmm. I read that Warner will be releasing a standalone later this year but I haven't heard the street date. I'm not upgrading to 4k so I hope it's soon.

If that's the case then they very well may be releasing a standalone after all.

[Jacques Souvenir]

Originally Posted by HD Goofnut

You don't have to have a 4K player. It has the BD with it.

^^^This

If you really wanted it, then you would've bought the 4k/Blu combo by now. If not, then don't complain about it.

[Cremildo]

Originally Posted by Jacques Souvenir

^^^This

If you really wanted it, then you would've bought the 4k/Blu combo by now. If not, then don't complain about it.

Yeah, no.

Not paying an exorbitant price on a format I have no interest in just to have the Blu-ray disc.

[Bates_Motel]

Originally Posted by Cremildo

Yeah, no.

Not paying an exorbitant price on a format I have no interest in just to have the Blu-ray disc.

LOL "exorbitant"

Bottom line is then you don't want ti that bad and it's not worth it to you. You made the choice, so that's that. I paid $24 and that's hardly "exorbitant" for a full on remaster.

[ROSS.T.G.]

LOL some if the remarks in these threads are so stupid.

[HD Goofnut]

Originally Posted by ROSS.T.G.

LOL some if the remarks in these threads are so stupid.

It's not just this thread.

[ROSS.T.G.]

Originally Posted by HD Goofnut

It's not just this thread.

LOL you got that right buddy.