|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $31.13 | ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $34.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.52 | ![]() $21.41 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#301 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
But this is the problem with today's society. Instead of being happy it got a remaster and looks fantastic, people would rather complain and dwell on things that didn't happen, or think should've happened. It's a sad state when complaining takes precedence over a positive. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | baheidstu (06-12-2017), Fat Phil (06-13-2017), HD Goofnut (06-12-2017), kingdoxie (07-15-2017), L'armée des ombres (06-13-2017) |
![]() |
#303 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#305 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#306 |
Banned
|
![]()
And the difference is, Blade Runner came out in 1982, not 1992, so the print was older, and the fact that Ridley went back and made a "Final Cut." That's why it was remastered then.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#310 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
Mar 2009
Denver, CO
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#313 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Rottweiler30 (07-14-2017) |
![]() |
#314 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#315 |
Special Member
Apr 2016
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#316 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Aragorn the Elfstone (07-14-2017) |
![]() |
#317 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Bottom line is then you don't want ti that bad and it's not worth it to you. You made the choice, so that's that. I paid $24 and that's hardly "exorbitant" for a full on remaster. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | HD Goofnut (07-14-2017), Jacques Souvenir (07-14-2017) |
![]() |
#320 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | HD Goofnut (07-14-2017) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|