Annabelle 3

[MileHigh AI]

So a 3rd Annabelle movie that still does not tell the story that the Warren's alluded to in the very first Conjuring. The first Annabelle was complete crap and none of my friends even bothered with the 2nd one because of it (and yes I've heard we should definitely give it a shot now) but I'm just more annoyed by the fact that in the first Conjuring movie they bring up how "Annabelle was their most terrifying case, blah blah blah" or whatever...they briefly mention it in the first Annabelle movie as well teasing us even more only to never tell that story.
I don't even care if the Warren's case directly involving them with Annabelle is good at this point, I just want what was teased back in 2013.

[Steedeel]

Originally Posted by levcore

Yes Universal are region free. The studio name is very apt in this instance.

Thanks mate.

[tiger_qc]

So I guess this isn't ¨based¨ on a true story like the two Conjuring movies. Annabelle was a prequel to the Conjuring, Annabelle 2 was a prequel to a prequel (and actually was quite better than the first prequel), how far can they go with this one?

This being said I'll purchased it for sure as Annabelle Creation was pretty good.

[BigBan]

Can't wait for releasing this awesome horror movie

[rooboy78]

McKenna Grace has now been cast as Judy Warren in the movie. Bizarre since they stated this will take place after the first scene in the Conjuring but before Perron case and before the Conjuring 2. So they cast an actress who is easily 5-6 years older than Judy was in the first movie even though this is supposed to be taking place before the first movie and after they bring Annabelle home.
It’s like they aren’t even bothering to be consistent with the continuity even though they are all about making this one big shared universe.

[mredman]

Originally Posted by rooboy78

McKenna Grace has now been cast as Judy Warren in the movie. Bizarre since they stated this will take place after the first scene in the Conjuring but before Perron case and before the Conjuring 2. So they cast an actress who is easily 5-6 years older than Judy was in the first movie even though this is supposed to be taking place before the first movie and after they bring Annabelle home.
It’s like they aren’t even bothering to be consistent with the continuity even though they are all about making this one big shared universe.

Maybe the actress they had before looked way older now. Nothing weird about that.

[rooboy78]

Originally Posted by mredman

Maybe the actress they had before looked way older now. Nothing weird about that.

Well both actresses are basically the same age, but I’m saying it’s weird because this movie is supposed to take place BEFORE the events of the first Conjuring but yet they cast an actress who is much older than young Judy was in the first movie. So continuity wise we have basically a teenage Judy in Annabelle 3 and then a very young Judy in the Conjuring which follows. Doesn’t make much sense.

[JEDGAR1000]

Originally Posted by rooboy78

Well both actresses are basically the same age, but I’m saying it’s weird because this movie is supposed to take place BEFORE the events of the first Conjuring but yet they cast an actress who is much older than young Judy was in the first movie. So continuity wise we have basically a teenage Judy in Annabelle 3 and then a very young Judy in the Conjuring which follows. Doesn’t make much sense.

According to this article, Annabelle 3 is supposed to be set after the Conjuring 2.

https://comicbook.com/horror/2018/09...-judey-warren/

and according to this article (which seemingly has it correct) its set in-between Conjuring 1 & 2

https://www.cinemablend.com/news/245...uring-timeline

Here's the actress that plays Judy in Conjuring 2



She looks somewhat older than the new actress, so I suppose the recast isn't too bad.

[rooboy78]

Originally Posted by JEDGAR1000

According to this article, Annabelle 3 is supposed to be set after the Conjuring 2.

https://comicbook.com/horror/2018/09...-judey-warren/

and according to this article (which seemingly has it correct) its set in-between Conjuring 1 & 2

https://www.cinemablend.com/news/245...uring-timeline

Here's the actress that plays Judy in Conjuring 2



She looks somewhat older than the new actress, so I suppose the recast isn't too bad.

The easiest thing would have been just to set it directly following the Conjuring 2 and cast the same actress. Now it just throws off the timeline and continuity. But that also makes me wonder if they will still bring back the original actress for the Conjuring 3 or use the younger Annabelle 3 actress.

It’s really not consistent.

[mredman]

Originally Posted by rooboy78

The easiest thing would have been just to set it directly following the Conjuring 2 and cast the same actress. Now it just throws off the timeline and continuity. But that also makes me wonder if they will still bring back the original actress for the Conjuring 3 or use the younger Annabelle 3 actress.

It’s really not consistent.

It doesnt throw off the timeline. Hardly anyone remember their daughter. And look how old she looked already in Conjuring 2 which was filmed 3 years ago. It makes sense they changed the actress.

[Kylo Ren]

Originally Posted by rooboy78

The easiest thing would have been just to set it directly following the Conjuring 2 and cast the same actress. Now it just throws off the timeline and continuity. But that also makes me wonder if they will still bring back the original actress for the Conjuring 3 or use the younger Annabelle 3 actress.

It’s really not consistent.

It's really not that big of a deal.