|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best iTunes Music Deals
|
Best iTunes Music Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $44.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $8.99 | ![]() $7.99 | ![]() $19.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $7.99 | ![]() $9.99 |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Sep 2008
Bainbridge Island, WA
|
![]()
jeff92k7 - An interesting post, but I can't agree with your statement that re-encode sounds better than audiophile. That conclusion strikes me as a personal opinion based on the notion that DTS at 1.5 mbps is better than DD 5.1 at 640 kbps just because the bitrate is higher. Dolby encoding is more efficient than DTS. It's hard enough to tell the difference between lossless and lossy when DD and DTS are encoded at the maximum legacy bitrates. I doubt you'd be able to pickout a DTS re-encode in a blind test with the audiophile Dolby output.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Quick Audio Question. | Audio Theory and Discussion | JJ | 12 | 04-11-2008 02:01 PM |
quick audio question | Home Theater General Discussion | richterbon23 | 5 | 02-02-2008 05:11 AM |
Quick Audio Question | Newbie Discussion | SkepticalGuy | 7 | 01-16-2008 01:12 PM |
Quick audio question | Receivers | j_rocca42 | 8 | 01-15-2008 05:02 PM |
Quick Audio Question... | Receivers | JJ | 2 | 10-17-2007 10:22 PM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|