The Legend of Bagger Vance (2000)

[BluProofie]

Originally Posted by AmishParadise

I just detailed what I found. And correct me if I'm wrong, but Criterion hasn't released all of those titles on Blu-ray. They're not all re-releases either. Several are being released on Blu-ray for the first time. Let me guess. You're one of those glass is half empty types.

Don’t Look Now, La Dolce Vita, Days of Heaven and Rosemary’s Baby were already released by Criterion. That’s what I was referring to. And I’m not sure why you think I was mad at you for posting this.

[rdodolak]

Thank you Paramount, this has been a long time coming!

[AmishParadise]

Originally Posted by BluProofie

Don’t Look Now, La Dolce Vita, Days of Heaven and Rosemary’s Baby were already released by Criterion. That’s what I was referring to. And I’m not sure why you think I was mad at you for posting this.

I'm not mad at you for posting what you did and nothing in my reply to you should have given you that impression. You said that I love to see it. You said that I love to see Paramount doing re-releases of movies that Criterion already released instead of ones that aren’t on Blu-ray. That statement isn't true. I don't love to see that. In fact, my reply stressed the exact opposite. And by the way, I'm not mad at you now either. As for re-releases, existing releases do go out of print, then becoming very expensive on the used market. Distribution rights can also be lost, so re-releases are never a bad thing. I do agree though. I'd much rather see more in the way of titles brought to Blu-ray for the first time than re-releases.

[BluProofie]

Originally Posted by AmishParadise

I'm not mad at you for posting what you did and nothing in my reply to you should have given you that impression. I was just correcting the record. You said that I love to see it. You said that I love to see Paramount doing re-releases of movies that Criterion already released instead of ones that aren’t on Blu-ray. That statement isn't true. I don't love to see that. Again, I was just correcting the record. And by the way, I'm not mad at you now either. As for re-releases, existing releases do go out of print, then becoming very expensive on the used market. Distribution rights can also be lost, so re-releases are never a bad thing. I do agree though. I'd much rather see more in the way of titles brought to Blu-ray for the first time rather than re-releases.

Oh shoot, my bad. “You love to see it” is an internet expression. I didn’t realize that’s what you were referring to. I didn’t realize you didn’t understand. Sorry!

https://stayhipp.com/glossary/you-love-hate-to-see-it/

[AmishParadise]

Originally Posted by BluProofie

Oh shoot, my bad. “You love to see it” is a meme. I didn’t realize that’s what you were referring to. I didn’t realize you didn’t understand. Sorry!

It's all good.

[Filmmaker]

One of only two titles I ever saw at the theater (the other being THE ENGLISH PATIENT) that I still, to this day, curse myself for not getting up and leaving in the middle. Just the most excruciating awful, turgid film. Not here to thread crap, though—just putting this on the table for anyone considering a blind buy.

[AmishParadise]

Different strokes for different folks.

[infiniteCR]

Would love to see this out soon. I got my money's with out of the dvd for sure.