Golden Age 3-D Features

[Eric Grayson]

In preservation, we all know him. He's one of the guys who says NO when you want to access UCLA material, something I long ago gave up on.

[Eric Grayson]

It should be clear that Mr. MacQueen is no longer at UCLA and no longer speaks for them. This is not what I consider a bad thing given his attitude.

[Interdimensional]

Originally Posted by Todd3D

Also, hello Mr. Grayson. Good to see you here. I signed up for your restoration of King of the Kongo and I want to tell you that I'm as eager for that as I am the 3DFA releases.

On a non-I, The Jury note, I watched the Warner Archive DVD of The Command tonight. It was the Cinemascope version, of course, but you can tell the movie was shot for 3D. I wish Warner Brothers would release the 3D version, along with all their other 3D movies.

Off topic for the thread, as it's certainly not a 3D title, but on further reading, I just had to join Todd3D in backing Eric Grayson's Kickstarter for King of the Kongo. It sounds like a hell of an involved restoration, just staggering in complexity, and even though it's not a title I had any particular interest in, I really appreciate that someone would go to all that trouble.

[Camps]

Originally Posted by Interdimensional

Off topic for the thread, as it's certainly not a 3D title, but on further reading, I just had to join Todd3D in backing Eric Grayson's Kickstarter for King of the Kongo. It sounds like a hell of an involved restoration, just staggering in complexity, and even though it's not a title I had any particular interest in, I really appreciate that someone would go to all that trouble.

Don't forget Bud Pollard's infamous 1932 curio The Horror (later reissued as "John the Drunkard). I watched it at the Library of Congress several years ago and it is insane. I read that you were efforting some kind of restoration/release on this, Eric, and -- if this is for real -- you can count on my Kickstarter contribution.

After all... I'm happy to do business with ... Kickstarter Boys...

[Eidolon]

I've just discovered Gorilla at Large, albeit in 2d on DVD. A great movie, very different to what I was expecting. Considering that this is 20th Century Fox, and as such now owned by Disney, is there any liklihood of seeing this in 3D? Do Disney permit licensing out of 20CF titles, like 20CF used to?

[Interdimensional]

No they are bastards. Apparently they bought that library so they could shove it in the vault and throw away the key.

But if I'm wrong that'd be brilliant.

[the13thman]

Originally Posted by Interdimensional

No they are bastards. Apparently they bought that library so they could shove it in the vault and throw away the key.

But if I'm wrong that'd be brilliant.

I wish you were wrong but all the evidence suggests you are correct, so unfortunately we have no chance of seeing Gorilla At Large on 3D Blu-ray.

[Camps]

Yep. After we get our paws on Robot Monster, that leaves three Golden Age horror/sci-fi genre 3D titles, at least two of which we're not likely to get on 3D blu ray. Two of them (like Robot Monster) feature a guy in a gorilla suit... the other a bunch of girls in cat suits...

[Interdimensional]

At least we'll get 1 gorilla-suit movie! The other two, sadly not At Large anytime soon. We need someone working on the inside, bust them out.

The girls in catsuits might even stand a better chance of getting a 3D-Bluray release than Avatar 2. Fingers crossed for that one.

[BleedOrange11]

Regarding I, the Jury, the recent accusations made against the 3-D Film Archive (3DFA) and their subsequent fallout with ClassicFlix’s upcoming Blu-ray 3D release sickens me. I believe further examination of the situation is needed to understand the story. Since 2012, Bob Furmanek has been happily and actively engaging with 3D enthusiasts on home theater internet forums. Deleting his I, the Jury announcement thread and going “radio silent” afterward was out of character for him, and I would like to ascertain why this happened.

Firstly, I would like to explore the 3DFA’s past relationship with I, the Jury by creating a timeline of their attachment to the film with links to their source posts. Secondly, I would like to highlight comments and accusations made by the 3DFA’s restoration peers, surrounding the TCM screening and Blu-ray 3D announcement. I believe that these comments have damaged their reputation to the point of forced removal from the project. Thirdly, I would like to offer reasons why collaboration with the 3DFA would benefit I, the Jury’s 3D audience and be in the best financial interest of the rights owners and the Blu-ray 3D distributor.


PART 1
I, the Jury/3-D Film Archive Timeline:

July 24, 1953 – I, the Jury premieres in Chicago, IL.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I,_the_Jury_(1953_film)

1991 – Bob Furmanek finds and recombines the only surviving dual 35mm 3D print of I, the Jury.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=980

July 27, 1999 – Bob Furmanek presents the UK’s first 3D play date of I, the Jury at the National Film Theatre in London. (It only played flat in the UK in 1953.) Mickey Spillane, the author of I, the Jury, was in attendance and was so pleased with Bob’s discovery that he took Bob out to one of London’s finest restaurants and treated him like an old friend.

http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/home/hi...of-the-archive

September 20, 2003 – Bob’s 35mm 3D print plays at the World 3-D Film Expo in Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA with Biff Elliot, I, the Jury’s lead actor, in attendance. Elliot was so emotional after the screening that he came up to Bob to give him a hug.

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...8/post-5112634

December 2011 – Bob Furmanek begins contacting rights owners with the idea of procuring a license to restore I, the Jury digitally for Blu-ray 3D.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=980

September 2, 2017 – Having a green light from I, the Jury’s UK copyright holder, Bob Furmanek announces the upcoming restoration of I, the Jury for Blu-ray 3D in his introduction for Those Redheads from Seattle’s screening at NYC’s Museum of Modern Arts’ 3-D Funhouse, a weeklong tribute event to the work of the 3DFA, curated by Dave Kehr, a former New York Times DVD reviewer and Chicago Reader and Chicago Tribune film critic.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=812
https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=974
https://www.moma.org/calendar/film/3872

September 5, 2017 – UCLA contacts Bob, regarding I, the Jury’s 3D restoration, and then everything changes.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=980

February 2018 – The 3DFA is no longer involved in I, the Jury’s 3D restoration but hopes they can be involved in future digital restoration work after UCLA finishes their photo-chemical work.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=980
https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=994

Early 2022 – ClassicFlix privately licenses I, the Jury for Blu-ray 3D release and asks the 3DFA to consult and work on their final 3D master.

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...9/post-5111550

April 22, 2022 – UCLA’s I, the Jury 3D restoration premieres at TCM Classic Film Festival in Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA.

https://filmfestival.tcm.com/program...i-the-jury-3d/

April 25, 2022 – ClassicFlix publicly announces I, the Jury for Blu-ray 3D, based on UCLA’s restoration, with plans to have the 3DFA perform stereoscopic alignment corrections exclusive to their release.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...postcount=3936

April 25, 2022 – 3DFA posts a picture of I, the Jury’s 1953 six-sheet poster with ClassicFlix’s and the 3DFA’s logos and text “Coming soon to Blu-ray 3D” photoshopped on top of it and saying it has taken 10 years to make this Blu-ray 3D happen.

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...8/post-5112659

May 3, 2022 – ClassicFlix edits their announcement post to remove 3DFA involvement. The 3DFA deletes announcement posts and pictures and goes silent regarding I, the Jury.

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...9/post-5110977

May 4, 2022 – ClassicFlix announces that the 3DFA is no longer part of their upcoming release.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...postcount=3997


PART 2: Why Did This Happen?
UCLA’s 3D Restoration, It’s Review from TCM Screening, and Accusations Against 3DFA:

Mid-April 2022 – Scott MacQueen, recently retired Head of Preservation at UCLA Film & Television Archive, takes a dig at BOB “you uncle” Furmanek and “kiss me” JACK Theakston of the 3DFA, while announcing UCLA’s I, the Jury 3D restoration premiere at TCM Classic Film Festival on his LinkedIn profile. He credits Jan-Christopher Horak for bringing the project to UCLA but not Bob Furmanek.



https://www.linkedin.com/posts/scott...90984192-ZmBy/

Aril 24, 2022 – UCLA’s I, the Jury 3D restoration receives a bad technical review from an anonymous 3D professional in attendance at the TCM screening, citing numerous vertical misalignment and vertical rotational errors left uncorrected, which would cause eyestrain for sensitive individuals.

[Show spoiler]

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...postcount=3929

April 25, 2022 – Alan K. Rode, a prominent film scholar and preservationist and charter director and Treasurer of the Film Noir Foundation in attendance at TCM screening, creates a new account at HTF to say that I, the Jury has never looked better, and there must be a hidden agenda behind the review.

[Show spoiler]

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...9/post-5110998

April 26, 2022 – Robert A. Harris, film historian, archivist, preservationist, and columnist and forum regular at HomeTheaterForum argues that vertical misalignment is a minor problem perceived only by some viewers and should not be corrected as the film was made that way.

[Show spoiler]

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...9/post-5111499

April 26, 2022 – Robert A. Harris accuses ClassicFlix of suggesting that UCLA’s restoration is not up to professional standards because they wanted the 3DFA to consult on their disc’s 3D master.

[Show spoiler]

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...9/post-5111550

April 26, 2022 – Robert A. Harris proposes that ClassicFlix should not consult the 3DFA but evaluate the stereoscopic alignment by themselves and then discuss their findings with UCLA and then decide whether the alignment should be altered or not.

[Show spoiler]

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...9/post-5111602

April 27, 2022 – Robert A. Harris suggests Bob Furmanek of taking credit for UCLA’s restoration.

[Show spoiler]

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...9/post-5111728

Late-April 2022 – Scott MacQueen accuses the 3DFA “Kickstarter boys” of taking complete credit for UCLA’s restoration on LinkedIn.



https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update...99038185472%29

April 29, 2022 – Robert A. Harris asks Bob Furmanek leading questions about the quality of UCLA’s restoration, including Roundabout Entertainment’s 3D work on the project, as well as his whereabouts on the night of the TCM screening.

[Show spoiler]

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...8/post-5112634

Early-May 2022 – Scott MacQueen comments a meme under his I, the Jury announcement on LinkedIn about the little red hen that eats all the bread for herself and will not share it with the pig, cat, or rat.



Zoom:

[Show spoiler]

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update...66121105408%29

May 2, 2022 – Robert A. Harris suggests that the previous anonymous bad technical review had an agenda.

[Show spoiler]

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...9/post-5113793

May 4, 2022 – Robert A. Harris is confident in the 3D work of Roundabout, citing a “major history with 3D productions”. Despite the anonymous report of uncorrected misalignment, he sees no problem with keeping the 3DFA out of the loop.

[Show spoiler]

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...9/post-5114456

May 7, 2022 – Scott MacQueen comments a copy of ClassicFlix’s post saying that the 3DFA is no longer involved in their release, adding “What more is there to say?”

[Show spoiler]

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update...94701688832%29


PART 3
Why the 3DFA Should Collaborate on I, the Jury’s Current 3D Master:

Bob Furmanek of the 3DFA preserved I, the Jury’s only 35mm 3D print in existence, has promoted and maintained interest in the film over the past 30 years, presented the film in 3D with a large, enthusiastic audience to Mickey Spillane and Biff Elliot before their deaths, and planted the seed with its UK rights holder for its digital restoration. He knows its 3D presentation well, and his archive should be allowed to collaborate on its upcoming release.

Firstly, 3DFA collaboration is good for 3D audience viewing comfort and enjoyment. Part of the 3DFA’s typical restoration process involves correcting 3D alignment, including vertical misalignment and size, rotational, and other geometric 3D distortions, frame-by-frame for the entire film. I would like to refer you to an evaluation by Greg Kintz, the technical director of the 3DFA, of Shout Factory’s 2020 release of Paramount’s 3D master of Friday the 13th Part 3 on Blu-ray 3D, which was later recalled, adjusted, repressed, and replaced at the distributor’s expense due to customer complaints over the alteration of the convergence point of its opening title pop-out. Notice, in particular, the last two linked images where Kintz compares the Shout Factory image, converted to anaglyph for ease of demonstration, to his own version of the same image with his alignment corrections.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=781

Original misaligned:

[Show spoiler]

3DFA alignment corrected:

[Show spoiler]

With glasses off, notice how much more red/cyan displacement is seen in the original image. With glasses on, notice how much easier it is for the eyes to focus on small details in the corrected image. The uncorrected original image is fuse-able, but it is slightly blurry in comparison. Over the course of an entire film, watching images like this causes eyestrain and headache in sensitive individuals. Even for those practiced with stereoscopic imagery, the corrected image just looks sharper and clearer and easier to look at. Performing this sort of alignment work is necessary for a top-quality 3D presentation. Except for those mastered by 3DFA, Warner Bros., and Sony Pictures, most vintage Blu-ray 3D releases do not correct alignment, which leads to common complaints of eyestrain, such as those heard from the discs of Friday the 13th Part 3, Jaws 3-D, Amityville 3-D, Metalstorm: The Destruction of Jared-Syn, and Comin’ at Ya!. An anonymous 3D professional complained of alignment errors in I, the Jury’s current 3D master after its TCM screening. ClassicFlix was right in originally wanting to consult the 3DFA to see if there indeed are any alignment errors to be corrected and should be allowed to do so after paying money for the license.

Secondly, 3DFA collaboration is good for production of the Blu-ray 3D disc. The 3DFA operates as an independent company outside of the Hollywood system, which allows them to charge a lower price to small companies, like ClassicFlix, on small budgets. Having the 3DFA create the digital master for disc replication will likely be significantly cheaper than ClassicFlix can source elsewhere. Additionally, the 3DFA has their own proprietary anaglyph conversion software, employed on their last four releases. Collaboration with the 3DFA will ensure not only a comfortable full HD 3D version to be enjoyed on 3DTVs and projectors, but also the creation of a high-quality anaglyph version for 2D displays, enabling a broader audience to purchase and watch the film in 3D. Note that alignment errors especially wreak havoc on anaglyph presentations, as seen in Kintz’s earlier linked evaluation of Friday the 13th Part 3.

Thirdly, 3DFA collaboration is good for disc sales, which makes more money for everyone involved. Given their prolific output of 25 Blu-ray 3D releases and active social presence on multiple home theater enthusiast forums and social media accounts, the 3DFA has built a fan following over the past 8 years. Through promotion on Facebook, Blu-ray.com, HomeTheaterForum, Nitrateville, DVDBeaver, TheDigitalBits, etc. they reach tens of thousands of home theater enthusiasts. Associating their brand with the disc will bring the disc to the attention of a larger audience, help viewers associate it with quality, and overall, sell more discs.

In conclusion, I, the Jury, John Alton’s film noir 3D cinematographic masterpiece is an important release for 3D and noir enthusiasts. It deserves the best presentation possible on Blu-ray 3D where it will reach a much larger audience than its festival screenings. It has already received a premium photo-chemical restoration from UCLA. There is no reason why the 3D experts at the 3DFA should not be allowed to comb the digital master for any remaining 3D errors and prepare it for its final release to consumers. I am of firm belief that any idea of Bob Furmanek and the 3DFA attempting to claim I, the Jury’s TCM restoration as their own work is a false twisting of words, fabricated by a former member of UCLA Film & TV Archive who selfishly wishes to prevent their collaboration, so he will not have to share his bread with them. The 3DFA has a long history with I, the Jury’s preservation, and there is no one more experienced to stereoscopically prepare its current restoration for Blu-ray 3D release.


PART 4
I, the Jury Blu-ray 3D Post-Release Reviews and Comments:

October 25, 2022 - Matt Hough of HTF reviews I, the Jury's Blu-ray 3D as a "fantastic restoration" with a "hearty recommendation."

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/i-t...d-film-review/

October 26, 2022 - Harris reviews I, the Jury's Blu-ray 3D as the finest 3D he has ever seen with stereo alignment "as good as one might possibly present."

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...4k-uhd.377453/

October 27, 2022 - Jeffrey Kauffman of Blu-ray.com review's I, the Jury's Blu-ray 3D as "largely superb" and "really excellent almost all of the time," linking to this timeline for an overview of it's complicated restoration history.

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/I-the...315680/#Review

October 29, 2022 - Harris jests that he and Scott MacQueen take full credit for the disc's superb quality and share great pride in the project.



https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...3/post-5173704

October 30, 2022 - Harris clarifies that he had nothing to do with the UCLA/Roundabout restoration and offers further argument for why 3D misalignment is a minimal error and that fixing it could be wrong because it removes the film from its original presentation. He also shares his thoughts on Kickstarter projects and film restoration performed outside of the Hollywood studio system.

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...3/post-5173927

October 31, 2022 - Harris defends the restoration's decision to remove I, the Jury's original theatrical intermission card, stating that it is unessential, unnecessary, and interruptive to narrative flow. Note that despite these feelings, intermission cards were included in Harris' high-profile restorations of Lawrence of Arabia and My Fair Lady. Also note that all Golden Age 3D features wrote an intermission into their scripts as an intentional break at a critical plot moment and as an opportunity for the projectionist to change film reels for the second half of the feature.

[Show spoiler]

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...3/post-5174161

October 31, 2022 - Ronald Epstein, former HTF owner, updates his Top 30 Must-Own 3D Titles list for the first time in three years to include I, the Jury as #1, the best-looking 3D restoration he has ever seen, akin to Warner Bros.' MPI's work (Dial M for Murder, House of Wax, Kiss Me Kate - all of which include original intermission cards) with no alignment issues. Most 3D films of late are not entertaining enough for him to watch more than 10 minutes, but this one is different.

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...3/post-5174223
https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...titles.300565/

October 31, 2022 - Harris agrees that I, the Jury's 3D restoration quality is most similar to MPI's work, taking into account inherent issues with WarnerColor.

https://www.hometheaterforum.com/com...3/post-5174253

November 4, 2022 - MacQueen celebrates successful Blu-ray reviews at HTF by sharing his version of events on LinkedIn, calling 3DFA an "autogenic" archive/film collector who tried to take credit for UCLA's restoration, while simultaneously planting a report of bogus technical problems that could only be solved by them, so they could bill the distributor to fix them. They were forced to abandon this plot by the rights holder.

[Show spoiler]

(edited version)

[Show spoiler]

[Show spoiler]

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/scott...487962112-lz3B

[MercurySeven]

Stellar work, BleedOrange! Given the available facts, I'd say that's as complete a case as can be made at this time. I'd suspected as much, and you've provided even more evidence to back up those suspicions. We, the jury, find in the 3DFA's favour, pending expert stereoscopic scrutiny of the final 3D blu-ray.

If those reported misalignment issues remain uncorrected on the finished release, we can be pretty sure what happened here. If it turns out to be a primo 3D presentation, with no issues, maybe we'll never know what really happened.

Personally, I'd like to know more about that anonymous 3D professional in attendance at the TCM screening. His reported bad review seems to have been the catalyst for this whole flare-up.

[WaverBoy]

I think that the Exhibit A above is quite telling. It’s pretty apparent who has an axe-grinding agenda here, and it sure the hell ain’t the 3DFA. Robert Harris’s comments are pathetically embarrassing and cringe-inducing, especially coming from a professional archivist (or any professional, really), and Scott MacQueen has apparently left himself wide open for a libel charge. If I were the rights holder of this 3D classic, I know who I’d want to align myself with in restoring it and presenting it. That’s right, actual professionals who have decades of actual specialized experience with restoring and presenting 3D films. The incomparable body of work in that field of Bob Furmanek and his team at the 3DFA speaks for itself, as does their professionalism.

[revgen]

I trust Classicflix.

[Todd3D]

Originally Posted by revgen

I trust Classicflix.

While I'm disappointed that the 3DFA got pushed out of working on this, I do trust Classicflix and will be getting it. It wouldn't be the first non-3DFA vintage release I've gotten, after all.

[pixote]

Originally Posted by MercurySeven

If those reported misalignment issues remain uncorrected on the finished release, we can be pretty sure what happened here. If it turns out to be a primo 3D presentation, with no issues, maybe we'll never know what really happened.

If the blu-ray doesn’t have alignment issues then it’ll be pretty obvious what happened. No need to pay for something to be done twice if it’s already done right the first time. No conspiracy, just common sense. Until the movie is released we won’t know.

[frozenhamster]

Originally Posted by WaverBoy

I think that the Exhibit A above is quite telling. It’s pretty apparent who has an axe-grinding agenda here, and it sure the hell ain’t the 3DFA. Robert Harris’s comments are pathetically embarrassing and cringe-inducing, especially coming from a professional archivist (or any professional, really), and Scott MacQueen has apparently left himself wide open for a libel charge. If I were the rights holder of this 3D classic, I know who I’d want to align myself with in restoring it and presenting it. That’s right, actual professionals who have decades of actual specialized experience with restoring and presenting 3D films. The incomparable body of work in that field of Bob Furmanek and his team at the 3DFA speaks for itself, as does their professionalism.

With the libel stuff and all that, I think you're getting a bit to heated on this. That said, Harris's comments do give me a feeling about the guy that I've been feeling for a while now, up to and including his comments on the new Godfather restoration.

Obviously that 4K presentation is a touchy subject, and there are definitely issues that even I have with the resulting discs, but Harris has basically presented a case that the work he did, which is necessarily interpretive, is the *true* Godfather restoration, while the new one is not a restoration at all. This despite the new one literally restoring more of the film using original or highest quality materials.

Add in the guy's seeming misunderstandings about the possibilities of HDR to better capture the look of a film presentation and I dunno... Maybe, great as he is at the work he does, we shouldn't be going to him as an authority on commentary about projects or discs he wasn't involved with.

Did 3DFA need to be brought in on I, The Jury to fix things? Maybe, maybe not. Would it be a little insulting to the people who actually did the 4K restoration to bring in an outside party to check or fix their work without involving them? Sure, perhaps, if that's what was happening. Are these professionals acting like petty jerks, needlessly denigrating a guy who's done incredible work rescuing the 3D presentations of films that in some cases never even got to screen publicly in the format they were filmed for? Yes, clearly.

[WaverBoy]

Originally Posted by frozenhamster

With the libel stuff and all that, I think you're getting a bit to heated on this.

I don’t think so at all. Those libelous comments appear to have been damaging enough to get the 3DFA kicked off the project, which could have further negative professional repercussions for them.

[infiniteCR]

Originally Posted by Todd3D

While I'm disappointed that the 3DFA got pushed out of working on this, I do trust Classicflix and will be getting it. It wouldn't be the first non-3DFA vintage release I've gotten, after all.

Originally Posted by pixote

If the blu-ray doesn’t have alignment issues then it’ll be pretty obvious what happened. No need to pay for something to be done twice if it’s already done right the first time. No conspiracy, just common sense. Until the movie is released we won’t know.

I don't have any experience with them other than the duplicitous statement they made earlier on assuring us that the 3DFA would be involved. So as far as I'm concerned that remains to be seen. But, yes, if the 3D alignment is flawless then it's much ado about nothing.

[BleedOrange11]

I tend to believe the anonymous reviewer because firstly, he uses very specific technical language. You have to have some experience with 3D to even understand what he is saying. He sounds like he has done this before and knows what to look for, whereas other positive reviews from Rode and Letterboxed are limited to general language like "3D never looked better" or "restoration was gorgeous" or "cinematography was great". We have this from Osmos:

Originally Posted by osmos512

The restoration looked fine. Image was very stable. There was one shot where the focus was soft in the left eye, but that's probably unfixable. I did notice frequent ghosting, but I'm pretty sure that was due to my torturous viewing angle.

Secondly, to my knowledge, there are no other 3D restorations from UCLA or Roundabout, which makes me think that this is their first time doing stereoscopic work from vintage elements. While the individuals involved may be experts at the top of their craft in 2D restoration, they may not know how to assess and correct 3D alignment. This scenario is not uncommon, as seen in some restorations funded by Universal and Paramount and others.

[WaverBoy]

Just for a little reality check, here’s a complete list of 3DFA restorations released or pending on 3D blu-ray since 2014 (with three 2D restorations thrown in for good measure):

1. Dragonfly Squadron
2. The Bubble
3. The Mask
4. Gog
5. It Came from Outer Space
6. September Storm
7. The Stewardesses
8. A*P*E
9. Those Redheads from Seattle
10. Cease Fire
11. The Maze
12. Revenge of the Creature
13. Sangaree
14. Jivaro
15. Parasite
16. The Bellboy and the Playgirls
17. Adam and Six Eves
18. El Corazon y la Espada
19. Taza, Son of Cochise
20. Wings of the Hawk
21. Silent Madness
22. Flesh for Frankenstein
23. Dynasty
24. Revenge of the Shogun Women
25. Treasure of the Four Crowns
26. The Diamond Wizard (announced, pending)
27. Prison Girls (announced, pending)
28. Africa Screams (2D)
29. Abbott and Costello season 1 (2D)
30. Jack and the Beanstalk (2D)
31. Robot Monster (announced, pending)

Plus a few dozen 3D shorts, cartoons and other bonus extras on various releases including 3D Rarities volumes one and two, plus several 3D feature restorations reportedly in the pipeline but not yet announced.

On May 4th, Robert Harris claimed that Roundabout has "a major history with 3D productions." How many vintage 3D features has Roundabout worked on?