As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
16 hrs ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
16 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
44 min ago
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.50
23 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
3 hrs ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray.com > Feedback Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-05-2022, 06:59 AM   #9
TheDean TheDean is offline
Moderator
 
TheDean's Avatar
 
Nov 2009
514
629
3930
1458
2331
2894
3067
104
272
12
247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottie View Post
The original DigiPack + slipcover releases were:

The 400 Blows
Bottle Rocket
Chungking Express
The Last Emperor
The Last Metro
Last Year at Marienbad
The Man Who Fell to Earth
El Norte
The Third Man

It's not like the original packaging was some special limited edition type of release. If I remember correctly, Criterion received criticism for the packaging and they reissued them (with the same UPCs). They even sold replacement cases for each movie through their site for $5 so folks didn't have to repurchase them.

So I don't really see a need for two separate database entries per film. If anything, I'd suggest making a note in the title section saying "Reissued in standard Scanavo case shortly after release."
I can understand that but.

If I owned this



I wouldn't want my collection to reflect that I owned this



and vice versa.


I don't see why there wouldn't be a need for two separate entries. I bet several people feel the same. Especially if your are looking at your collection in spine view.

If you only own the original version and looked at you collection in spine view. You would see the Scanavo case and think, "that is not what I own". I don't have the slipcover digiapak so I can't upload that spine. So I just cropped off the case so it more closely represents that version. If you happen to own both. Your collection can reflect that.


Doesn't matter if Criterion realized they made a mistake. A DigiPak exists and the database should reflect that.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Cephalopod (07-05-2022), jkoffman (07-05-2022)
 
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray.com > Feedback Forum

Tags
blu-ray, criterion, digipack, digipak, separation

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:06 AM.