|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $44.99 | ![]() $27.13 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $27.57 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 44 min ago
| ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $30.50 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#9 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
If I owned this ![]() I wouldn't want my collection to reflect that I owned this ![]() and vice versa. I don't see why there wouldn't be a need for two separate entries. I bet several people feel the same. Especially if your are looking at your collection in spine view. If you only own the original version and looked at you collection in spine view. You would see the Scanavo case and think, "that is not what I own". I don't have the slipcover digiapak so I can't upload that spine. So I just cropped off the case so it more closely represents that version. If you happen to own both. Your collection can reflect that. ![]() Doesn't matter if Criterion realized they made a mistake. A DigiPak exists and the database should reflect that. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Cephalopod (07-05-2022), jkoffman (07-05-2022) |
|
|
![]() |
Tags |
blu-ray, criterion, digipack, digipak, separation |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|