|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $124.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $39.95 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.97 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $23.79 42 min ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $70.00 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Feb 2009
|
![]()
I just updated to the new Panasonic PT-AE3000 Projector and am blown away by the quality of Blu-Rays on this 1080P projector. However I get the feeling that my older DVD's don't look as good as they used to on my old Sanyo WXGA 720P projector. This could be just a result of the Blu-Rays looking so good the the DVD's just pail in comparison but I'm having a hard time buying it. Does anyone know of any reason why DVD's would look worse because of the upscaling involved with 1080P? Also, has anyone else updated from another front projector to this one and noticed a difference in their DVD catalog. My old projector is "dead" or I'd just compare the two. I can't imagine having to replace all of my DVD's with Blu-Rays.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I imagine the sharpness of the Panasonic is greater than your previous projector, to the point that you notice flaws that your other projector couldn't project.
If you watch enough dvds, you may want to invest in a dedicated dvd upconverter which may do a better job than your current player. Also, what data from the dvd's are you sending to the player? 480P or 1080P? It could be that the panasonic doesn't do as good a job upconverting the image to 1080P from a lower resolution source than your previous player did upconverting to 720P. If you player is converting to 1080p output on dvds, then this would be moot. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Feb 2009
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Would a dedicated dvd up-converter do a better job then the ones in the player or projector? If so, do you have a ballpark as to cost? I'm wondering if a $1K 720p projector might be warranted for dvd only playback? Or perhaps starting another complete collection is in order. I was planing on duplicating (yet again) my favorite films, but there are a lot I have that are just not worth the upgrade. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
You also may want to look at the scaling options available in the AE3000's menus that may help improve your DVD's. WWW.DVDO.com EDIT: Another option if you do not want to go with an external video scalier, would be a DVD player with better video scaling abilities then your projector. OPPO's DV-983H is considered one of the best DVD players you could buy for under a grand and is $399 as I recall. The DV-983H uses the same scaling chip as the DVDO edge but the OPPO will only scale it's own source unlike the EDGE that will do every source you connect to it (DVD, Cable, Satellite, etc.). The DV-983H has been discontented by OPPO but they can still be found from dealers. The DV-983H is being replaced by OPPO's new Blu-Ray player the BDP-83 which is basically the DV-983H but with Blu-Ray capability's. www.oppo.com Which way to go IMO would be how much 1080 content do you watch on your projector? If over 50% of what you watch is not 1080p content I would consider the EDGE. If you mostly watch 1080p content and some 480/720 here and there, then I would consider an OPPO. But remember any resolution you send to your display that is not 1920X1080 your display will scale up to it's resolution of 1920X1080 and the EDGE will do a better job of it then your display. I also like that the EDGE will let you calibrate each input separately so you can run test patterns on each one of your sources and calibrate each source to your display to get the maximum video quality out of each source component. Last edited by Oddiophile; 03-01-2009 at 01:48 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Feb 2009
|
![]()
I did find a button on the front of my player that sets the output and I do believe that I see a noticeable improvement when set to 480p. I am not convinced that it is as good as it was before, but (with a glass of wine) it is good enough.
I had a gut feeling that good decoding would not come cheap but I also have the gut feeling that any amount of electronic manipulation will never get the DVD's to look anything like the Blu-Rays. I'm thinking the money would be better spent replacing the films I really love. Since I started collecting I have libraries containing reel-to-reel, Betamax, VHS, Laserdisc, and now DVD's which finally looked "good enough". Oh well, I guess technology will force me into yet another collection. The DVD's look good enough for most of the films, but I will replace all the ones I really enjoy with Blu-Rays. I do appreciate all of the input, thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
In general, the more you blow up an image, the more flaws in the source are visible and the more artifacts you introduce. There's an easy, if not entirely relevant way to see what I mean. Open up a digital photo you've taken in the image editor of your choice. Crop an interesting 720x480 section of the photo. Then, change the size of that cropped section to 1280x720. Change the size of the original cropped section again, this time to 1920x1080. Compare both blown-up images and see which one seems more pleasing to the eye. Obviously, these aren't moving images and the "upconversion" algorithm being used probably isn't as sophisticated as what is in most consumer electronics, but you get the idea. The ideal way to watch a standard DVD is on a 480p native display. In my experience, a 720p display is sort of the "sweet spot" between the advantages of added pseudo-detail and the disadvantages of artifacts and flaw visibility that results from upconversion. Watching a DVD on a 1080p display is generally too heavy on the upconverting disadvantages, especially when talking about front projectors. I prefer to watch DVDs on my 37" 720p LCD rather than my 1080p front projector, unless the DVD has an absolutely stellar transfer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Feb 2009
|
![]()
That makes sense.
I have found that the quality of transfers (encoding) on my DVD's stands out much more then before. Bad ones look worse and the best ones look about the same. One thing I have found, if I plan to watch both DVD's and Blu-Rays in the same session, watch the DVD's first. Any DVD after a Blu-Ray just looks bad. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
What DVD player are using?
Is your DVD player outputting 480i/p or is it upscaling? If your DVD player is upscaling to 720p for your old projector, on the AE3000 you will be scaling the image twice. 480i to 720p in the DVD player, and 720p to 1080p in the AE3000. You should try leaving the DVD player on 480i and let the AE3000 scale the image to 1080P and then try switching the player to scale to 1080p and see which one looks better. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Feb 2009
|
![]() Quote:
I'm using a Philips BDP7200 player. As I remember (because of all the stop copy rules) the old projector would only accept a 480i input (no hdmi plug) from the Blu-Ray player and it really upset me at the time as I couldn't gt the full 720p projection output. With the new projector I have the player set to auto as this was the first setting that I was able to get DTS-HD pure audio through the hdmi cable and into the receiver. I just left it there as everything appeared to be working correctly. The player says it will up-convert DVD video to 1080p via hdmi but I really have no idea what is going on when I play a dvd. I'll have to play around with the output of the player and see what I can get. Thanks for the insight. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
You should check out the owner's thread for that player to see how well the dvd upconversion works as well as the proper settings for the player. Once that is done, you should be able to make some minor adjustments, if any, so that your dvd's look better than they did on the other projector.
Phillips BDP7200 Owner's Thread If the upconverter in this player isn't up to snuff, then the oppo is a very good option. I'm not familiar with the upconvert abilities of the projector, but it should be a quick enough check to attach an old dvd player to your receiver and allow the projector to upconvert the signal. Good luck and enjoy your new toy ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Feb 2009
|
![]()
I don't think so. This is a definite sharpness issue. If anything the new projector has better color/contrast, at least when watching Blu-Ray.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Cleaning the Panasonic AE3000 | Projectors | ryoohki | 5 | 12-27-2011 06:33 AM |
Panasonic PT-AE3000 NEW Projector! | Projectors | Schrute Farms | 69 | 03-23-2009 09:37 PM |
Cooling and the Panasonic PT-AE3000 | Projectors | Ron Walker | 5 | 03-21-2009 06:01 PM |
Epson HC1080UB vs. Panasonic PT-AE3000 | Projectors | Schrute Farms | 35 | 01-03-2009 03:43 AM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|