|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $142.11 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $38.68 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $17.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $42.84 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $48.55 | ![]() $13.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $10.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $21.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $29.96 |
![]() |
#1281 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1282 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
^
One thing that few know about is that the max. data rate for 2D 24fps imagery has been set at 250 Mb/sec by the DCI (http://www.dcimovies.com/specification/) and many D-Cinema experts believe that a higher data rate should have been spec-ed from the get-go for large format (65mm source) 4K. If that theory is true it means that this lower data rate is softening or making the large format movies more blurry than they should be when you see any 4K DCPs of those films than if a higher data rate had been spec-ed. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1283 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() It may not be shooting in 4K rez like the rest of the films listed in the previous posts in this thread, but at least it’s shooting ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1284 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Now compare that to the fact that a single uncompressed 4K image (at its original maximum resolution and 12 bits per component) requires about 39.8 Mbytes of storage space. This translates to a data rate at 24 FPS of 955.5 Mbyte/s ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1285 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
And so it begins on a larger marketing scale now…….
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2013-...rest-in-4k-tvs |
![]() |
![]() |
#1286 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
ATTENTION Locals,
Registration is now open and FREE...until May 25 - http://www.cinegearexpo.com/category/register At the very least you can get to see a complimentary screening of the 4K DCP of After Earth with an accompanying panel discussion - http://www.cinegearexpo.com/77/ |
![]() |
![]() |
#1287 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
A Place to Call Home, a TV drama…http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2258904/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1288 | ||
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#1289 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1290 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Given the fact that Arsenal qualified for the Champions League today
![]() (now they just have to spend some of that money coming in on some truly world class players), I'll see if I can think of a *shot in 4K commercial* containing at least a tiny reference to the game of football. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1291 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1292 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Then, what came next was even more odd. For instead of simply answering the interviewer’s question as to how close do you have to sit to a 4K tv in order to derive benefit, Joe discusses the situation from a completely different perspective. He addresses the concept (based on his testing) that in order to have a 1080p display which is appropriate to see what’s in the picture, he says it must be at least 6 ft. diagonal….for just a 1080p set….no matter how close you sit to it! So, to all you owners with 1080p tvs smaller than 72”, I’ll have you know that you all have been wasting your money all these years because you didn’t buy the proper-sized set, no matter how close or far you are sitting from it….Don’t even ask what screen size he thinks you need for 4K “to truly see what’s in the picture”. I have a novel idea for Joe, instead approaching the value or benefit of 1080p or 4K in an ass-backwards fashion and basically determining how large a screen one needs to *break the codec* by magnifying the encoding errors so he and his friends can see them….why not do a simple straightforward test which would be more practical to consumers, like, for instance, determining how far away from the screen viewers can sit and still see a measurable difference between 4K and 1080p content. And use the best case scenario….meaning native 4K out of something like an F65 camera, because it will be a given that with the implementation with either AVC or HEVC compression for consumers, there will be at least some loss in PQ from the native uncompressed source. I mean it’s not going to get any better than a native 4K source. I’ll spoon-feed the method for the experiment – run in native 4K into one TV….well, of course first crop the native 4K content to consumer 4K ( e.g. 4K -> 3,840 pixels), without making a big deal out of it and going on a talk show. Make copies of that test footage and down-rez it to 1080p (with the best converters commonly used throughout the post production business) for the sample for the HD portion of the 4K vs HDtv shootout viewing distances….and reveal to people on the next talk show what you found out…..and do it with no less than 50 untrained volunteers (typical consumers, not 'video gurus'). But, alas, some people will already know the answer to that. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1293 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1294 | ||
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() For context, see the last few pages of this thread – https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...212350&page=60 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#1295 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1296 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
A F/U to the News of the Day…no, not a reminiscent look back at the visual history of home media formats….https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...ed#post7581544
but rather, money talks - https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...ox#post7582416 Sony closes up ~ 8.96% Microsoft closes down ~ 0.74% P.S. But with regards to SNE...for a different reason than some expected - http://www.foxbusiness.com/technolog...-spinoff-plan/ Last edited by Penton-Man; 05-22-2013 at 12:47 AM. Reason: added a P.S. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1297 |
Banned
Apr 2013
|
![]()
Saw a 4K demo today at Best Buy for SONY. Not all that blown away, it wasn't all that much better than 1080p. There was a difference, but not much.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1298 |
Blu-ray Ninja
May 2010
Denmark
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1299 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]()
I remember people saying the same thing about bluray demos. The reality was very different. Different people's perceptions play a big part, of course.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1300 |
Banned
Apr 2013
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|